Online tracking of the speed post is showing item delivered but ACPIO, item not delivered to High court

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Mockery of R.T.I. Act 2005 by CPIO/Registrar and FAA/Registrar General High court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 12 October 2018 at 15:18

To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>
Cc: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, registrar-cic@nic.in
Bcc: cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup@up.nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in

An application under article 32 of the constitution of India.
To
                   Hon’ble chief justice of India/Companion Judges
                                Supreme court, New Delhi, India
Subject-Our fundamental/Human Rights are no more safe if the CPIO High court of Judicature at Allahabad and its first appellate authority Registrar General itself are violators of our rights. Here protectors are predators and there is no expectation of justice from any quarter.
With due respect and regard to Hon’ble Sir, the appellant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
An enquiry under article 51 A of the constitution of India as a step towards the
betterment of the Society. 
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties 
It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the 
Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag 
and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism 
and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective 
activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour 
and achievement
 .
2 -It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 by the public authority High court of Judicature at Allahabad. Registrar General didn’t entertain the first appeal because he didn’t receive the first appeal as told by the assistant central public information officer Pankaj Shrivastava to the central information commission but there is ample evidence that office of  
                                Registrar general/ First appellate authority
                                   High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
                                   Allahabad Pin Code:- 211017 Uttar Pradesh

received the despatch 30/01/2017 on 01/02/2017 ipso fact obvious from this online tracking-Delivered On
Allahabad High Court S.O 01/02/2017
Event Details For EU738301755IN Current Status: Item delivered at Allahabad High Court S.O
Date Time Office Event
01/02/2017 12:49:00 Allahabad High Court S.O Item delivered

 3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that   CPIO made available the denial of sought information dated 27/11/2016 through his communication dated 22-March-2018 and made available to the applicant on 24-March-2018 after the hearing dated-23-March-2018 took place in the central information commission where assistant CPIO claimed to provide the sought information ipso facto obvious from his own communication Judgment of the central information commission. At the place of 30 days, CPIO High court of Judicature at Allahabad took 1 year 3 months 25 days in denying a sought information. Moreover, First Appellate Authority/ Registrar general High court of Judicature at Allahabad didn’t deem it fit to consider the appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005. The hearing took place before CIC on 23-March-2018 and aforementioned lacunae on the part of public authority High court of Judicature at Allahabad was brought up by the applicant before chief information commissioner of India but the outcome remained null ipso facto obvious from the attached scanned copy of the judgment of chief information commissioner of India.

4-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
To
                                Registrar general/ First appellate authority
                                   High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
                                   Allahabad Pin Code:- 211017 Uttar Pradesh
Subject- Regarding non-compliance of subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005.
When the applicant fully confirmed that communication received in the office of Registrar general and he didn’t take any action on the appeal then filed the second appeal quite obvious if Hon’ble Sir may visit on the following link-
With this representation also the respective documentary evidence are attached proving the receive of appeal by the office of the registrar general High court of Judicature at Allahabad.
5-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that sought information denied but in compilation and collation of information CPIOtook 1 year 3 months and 25 days in denying the sought information. Whether it is a reflection of a healthy democracy?
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is the need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                  Yours sincerely

Date-12-10-2018              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001



4 attachments
Dispatch record of Appeal submitted to Registrar General High court.pdf
1055K
Public authority High court of judicature CPIO made mockery of RTI.pdf
1072K
Undue deliberate delay by CPIO Highcourt condoned by CIC.pdf
950K
Mockery of Right to Information Act and tyranny in Highcourt.pdf
1827K

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

CPIO made available the denial of sought information dated 27/11/2016 through his communication dated 22-March-2018 and made available to the applicant on 24-March-2018 after the hearing dated-23-March-2018 took place in the central information commission where assistant CPIO claimed to provide the sought information ipso facto obvious from his own communication Judgment of the central information commission. At the place of 30 days, CPIO High court of Judicature at Allahabad took 1 year 3 months 25 days in denying a sought information. Moreover, First Appellate Authority/ Registrar general High court of Judicature at Allahabad didn’t deem it fit to consider the appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005.

Arun Pratap Singh
2 years ago

Registrar general/ First appellate authority
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Allahabad Pin Code:- 211017 Uttar Pradesh
received the despatch 30/01/2017 on 01/02/2017 ipso fact obvious from this online tracking-Delivered On
Allahabad High Court S.O 01/02/2017
Event Details For EU738301755IN Current Status: Item delivered at Allahabad High Court S.O
Date Time Office Event
01/02/2017 12:49:00 Allahabad High Court S.O Item delivered