Online second appeal submitted against denial of sought information by CPIO State Bank of India.

Online appeal application submitted
Inbox
x
Central Information Commission (CIC) no-reply@nic.in via nic.in 
22:00 (2 minutes ago)
    to me, feedback-cic
Dear Yogi M P Singh,
Your online appeal is diarised. Details are given below:
1
Diary Number
628773
2
Diary date
15-08-2018
Please logon to : www.cic.gov.in for any further details.
Regards,
Central Information Commission (CIC)

Pasted from <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgxvxBXztXwHRnVHGbCdjrgzCJqkC>

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether it is not mockery of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005 by CPIO State Bank of India?
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 15 August 2018 at 09:34
To: secy-cic@nic.in, agmpne.lholuc@sbi.co.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, “sec. sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>

To
                                         Chief Information Commissioner of India 

Central Information Commission

CIC Bhawan, Baba Gangnath Marg 
Munirka,New Delhi – 110 067

Fax: 26186536
Helpline No.: 011-26767500
Email : fdesk-cic@gov.in
  Subject-CPIO, State Bank of India provided incomplete and cryptic misleading information in the manner against the spirit of Right to Information Act 2005.                    Appellant-Yogi M. P. Singh S/O Rajendra Pratap Singh

Mohalla –Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Mobile number-7379105911

District-Mirzapur, Pincode-231001, Uttar Pradesh, India.    
  Respondents-
1- Central Public Information Officer and regional manager
(R.B.O. II), State Bank of India, Administrative office, in front of Kachahari, Varanasi Uttar Pradesh.

2- First appellate authority and General Manager (Network III)
State Bank of India, Local head office, Moti Mahal Marg,
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh Pincode-226021.
Prayer-CPIO, State Bank of India made available incomplete cryptic misleading information through its communication dated-17/03/2018 in order to provide sought information as sought by the appellant through R.T.I. communique dated-20/02/2018.
As usual first appellate authority blindly supported the illegal stand of central public information who withheld the sought information concerned with the public interest and most surprising is that FAA made the decision dated 09/05/2018 arbitrarily and without taking the perusal of sought information seriously.
Short submissions-
1-Sought information dated 20/02/2018 is as follows.              
With due respect, the applicant invites the following information from concerned central public information officer of the public authority state bank of India under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
1-Please, take a reference of transaction dated-20-Feb-2018 as DEBIT ATM ANNUAL FEE 2017-18 – 5596010032470039.
1-A-Please made available the date and noting’s of the application made by your information seeker in order to seek ATM from state bank of India.
2-B-Please made available the transaction detail ever made by your information seeker from aforementioned hypothetical and fictitious ATM of state bank of India.
2-Please made available the amount of non-performing assets declared in three years in city branch of state bank of India district-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow in the light of guidelines of reserve bank of India.
3- Please made available amount recovered by city branch of state bank of India, district-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow in three years from borrowers through its various schemes like one-time settlement schemes (OTS) and various other measures. 
20-Feb-2018
(20-Feb-2018)
TO TRANSFER INB Bharti Airtel Ltd
107336212410IGACYJEGX6 TRANSFER TO 4
98.00
11,901.68
20-Feb-2018
(20-Feb-2018)
TO TRANSFER INB Commission of IGACYIYVW1-
IGACYIYVW1ICU6166614 TRANSFER TO 319
11.80
11,889.88
20-Feb-2018
(20-Feb-2018)
DEBIT ATM ANNUAL FEE 2017-18 – 5596010032470039
206.50
11,683.38
Please provide access to aforementioned sought information within time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005. For this, your information seeker will always pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-20-02-2018                  Yours sincerely


                                                 Yogi M P Singh  
2-Status of the online application is as follows.

Enter Registration Number SBILW/R/2018/50072
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of filing 20/02/2018
Public Authority SBI Lucknow Circle
Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO CPIO
Date of action 22/02/2018
Details of CPIO :- Telephone Number:- , Email Id:-
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number 05222295363
Email Id agmpne.lholuc@sbi.co.in

3-Reply of CPIO and the cryptic arbitrary decision of the first appellate authority and communications exchanged as well are attached with this representation.
4-Dates and notings were not made available. Transaction details made through master card were not made available. Where is the information sought under point 2 and 3? Information made available by CPIO can be understood by the corrupt public staffs only.
                 This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely

Date-15-08-2018              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, 7237849131, 9336252631 Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.



5 attachments
Online RTI First Appeal Status Form.pdf
605K
Reply of CPIO SBI incomplete and misleading.pdf
432K
Online RTI Status Form.pdf
599K
Reply of FAA SBI.pdf
691K
Sought informaion and documents from SBI.pdf
424K
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

3-Reply of CPIO and the cryptic arbitrary decision of the first appellate authority and communications exchanged as well are attached with this representation.
4-Dates and notings were not made available. Transaction details made through master card were not made available. Where is the information sought under point 2 and 3? Information made available by CPIO can be understood by the corrupt public staffs only.

Preeti Singh
2 years ago

As usual first appellate authority blindly supported the illegal stand of central public information who withheld the sought information concerned with the public interest and most surprising is that FAA made the decision dated 09/05/2018 arbitrarily and without taking the perusal of sought information seriously.