Non uniformity in the fee structure of S.B.I. is the root cause of all evils.This is a form of corruption.

GRIEVANCE REGN No DEABD/E/2017/07377

Personal
x

AGM CUSTOMER agmcustomer.lholuc@sbi.co.in

28 Mar (5 days ago)

to me
Gmail couldn’t verify that sbi.co.in actually sent this message (and not a spammer).  Learn more
Dear Sir,
 
We acknowledge receipt of the abovementioned complaint.
 
in this connection we have to advise that charges on various services are decided by the Bank considering the cost involved on infrastructure ,manpower and other operational expenses ,and after discussion with the concerned Department.
Regards,
 
AGM (CS),
SBI,
LHO, Lucknow.

Grievance Status

Print || Logout
Thank You for Your Valuable Feedback
Status as on 02 Apr 2017

Registration Number : DEABD/E/2017/07377
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 13 Mar 2017
Received by : Department of Financial Services (Banking Division)
Forwarded to : State Bank of India
Contact Address : Corporate Centre, Customer Service Deptt.
State Bank Bhawan, 6th Floor, Madam Cama Road,
Mumbai400021
Contact Number : 02222740460
Grievance Description : Whether it is justified fee structure of state bank of India which is arbitrarily imposed on students/aspirants. State bank of India ,premier banking institution of government of India having blessings of accountable public functionaries of government of India and because of it various departments of government of India mostly takes the services of this bank .. With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that ucanapply.com which collects the fee of Banaras Hindu university levies charges two percent on every transaction ipso facto obvious from the following transactions made. ucanapply.com levied charges Rs.10.00 on collection of fees Rs.500.00 from students as obvious from the first transaction made. ucanapply.com levied charges Rs.5.00 on collection of fees Rs.250.00 from students as obvious from the second transaction made. ucanapply.com levied charges Rs.4.00 on collection of fees Rs.200.00 from students as obvious from the third transaction made. ucanapply.com levied charges Rs.2.00 on collection of fees Rs.100.00 from students as obvious from the fourth transaction made.2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that state bank of India which collects the fee for recruitment cell of central reserve police force levies charges arbitrarily on every transaction ipso facto obvious from the following transactions made and earlier made representations . .State bank of India levied charges Rs.12.00 on collection of fees Rs. 100.00 from students as obvious from the first and second transactions made but subject to note commission charged were levied after 24 hours of transactions whether it is not cryptic dealing .3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that state bank of India which collects the fee joint entrance exam for Uttar Pradesh polytechnics levies charges arbitrarily on every transaction ipso facto obvious from the following transactions made and earlier made representations . .State bank of India levied charges Rs.11.40 on collection of fees Rs. 200.00 from students as obvious from the first and same collection charges levied on the collection of Rs.300.00 as obvious from the second transactions made but subject to note commission charged were levied latter of transactions made whether it is not cryptic dealing . Whether it is uniform fee structure.This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir. Yours sincerely Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Current Status : CASE CLOSED
Your Feedback :
Poor
Date of Action : 28 Mar 2017
Details : : Disposed Details of decision taken : reply send to complainant attach Type of Disposal : Accepted

2 comments on Non uniformity in the fee structure of S.B.I. is the root cause of all evils.This is a form of corruption.

  1. Think about the gravity of situation levy of charges of S.B.I. is decided by BY CONCERNED department. It means some thing is not right.
    AGM CUSTOMER
    28 Mar (5 days ago)

    to me

    Gmail couldn't verify that sbi.co.in actually sent this message (and not a spammer). Learn more
    Dear Sir,

    We acknowledge receipt of the abovementioned complaint.

    in this connection we have to advise that charges on various services are decided by the Bank considering the cost involved on infrastructure ,manpower and other operational expenses ,and after discussion with the concerned Department.
    Regards,

    AGM (CS),
    SBI,

  2. In public interest ,they should provide sought information. As a confidence building measure ,they must come forward with sought information as public faith in the department is must otherwise electorates will teach the lessons to these electorates. To cry on public platform that I am honest and actually to be honest both are different things.Undoubtedly this is real face , now public has to analyse whether they have to choose right or wrong.The treatment must be fair and transparent.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: