No other is more qualified than I.A.S. then why others make the approach.

422 vied for 5 info commissioner posts

Over 422 people applied for five posts of Information Commissioners in the Central Information Commission last year. 

The shortlist of 15 people submitted to the prime minister-led panel included Law Secretary B A Agarwal, who did not make the cut, according to information obtained under the Right To Information (RTI) Act.

The Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) has now made public the list of applicants and the shortlist prepared by a search committee headed by Cabinet Secretary Ajit Seth.

The shortlist of 15 had gone to a committee consisting of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Law Minister Kapil Sibal and Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj. 

The panel had selected five candidates during a meeting on November 10. The five candidates were, IAS officer Yashvardhan Azad, former diplomat Sharat Sabharwal, former IAS officer Manjula Prasher, former IAS officer M A Khan Yusufi and Madabhushi Sridhar Acharyulu, a professor.

Other than Agrawal, the shortlist included Tribal Affairs Secretary Vibha Puri, former petroleum secretary Girish Chandra Chaturvedi, DoPT Secretary P K Mishra and former IAS officer Sanjeev Kumar Tripathi, according to the reply provided in the RTI query raised by activist S C Agrawal, who himself was an applicant.

The minutes of the meeting chaired by the prime minister said the names suggested by the search committee headed by Seth were evaluated on the “basis of the width, diversity, relevance and length of experience of the applicant, with some preference for legal background and strategic exposure. 
Here all the appointed information commissioners have come from the system. At this time ,credibility of the system has reached on its nadir. Whether the person as public functionary itself withheld the  information whether such person will be instrumental in providing information to information seekers. Whether this is outcome of the judgement of Apex court on the appointment of information commissioners. We want transparent and accountable government. Please take a glance of following link to know the truth of regime of Right to Information.It is unfortunate that no P.I.O. is punished under section 20

1 comment on No other is more qualified than I.A.S. then why others make the approach.

  1. Right to Information Act 2005 was brought up in order to enhance transparency and accountability in the system. But appointment of Babudom at the vacant post of information commissioners has made the edge of this weapon blunt and like other institutions information commissions have been also centre of wrongdoings. On one side of screen ,parties want to demand vote in the name of good governance but on other side they itself don't want to appoint the information commissioners . Only transparent and accountable government can be accepted as good governance but common public is desperate as having no option.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: