No action is taken on the representations in judiciary even if matter be concerned with larger public interest

Please direct an independent credible agency to look into the
matter and make the report public.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
20/03/2016
    to pmosb, presidentofind., supremecourt, urgent-action, cmup, hgovup
According to His Excellency ,estimate made
for new building for Lucknowbench of High court of
judicature at Allahabad was Rs. 770 Crore in 2010 and it had to be completed
in  2014 but due to delay of near about one  year in its completion
,it increased to Rs. 1386 Crore i.e. Additional burden of Rs. 616 Crore on
public exchequer. As a citizen of this country under Article 51 (a)of
constitution of India ,seeks enquiry by an independent agency regarding this
huge expenditure.
20 March 2016
13:00
With due respect your appellant wants to draw
the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
please take a glance of published report in leading daily Amar Ujala in regard
to delivered speech of Hon’ble His Excellency-
राज्यपाल राम नाईकPC: amar ujala
राज्यपाल राम नाईक ने कहा कि न्याय प्रणाली के
सामने शीघ्र इंसाफ दिलाने की चुनौती है। तारीख पर तारीख लगने से वादकारियों की
उम्मीदों को झटका लगता है।
राज्य पाल राम नाईक लखनऊ में हाईकोर्ट
के नए भवन के उद्घाटना के अवसर पर बोल रहे थे। उन्होंने कहा
13 मार्च को इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट की 150वीं वर्षगांठ मनाई गई और आज लखनऊ बेंच के नए भवन का उद्घाटन हुआ है। इस
भव्य इमारत से लखनऊ को नई पहचान मिली है।
वर्ष 2010 में
इसकी लागत
 770 करोड़ रुपये आंकी गई थी और इसे 2014 में पूरा होना था। निर्माण में दो साल देर होने से लागत 616 करोड़ बढ़कर 1386 करोड़ रुपये हो गई।
समय से प्रोजेक्ट पूरा न होने को कॉमर्स की भाषा
में टाइम ओवर रन कहा जाता है। न्याय दिलाने में भी ऐसी प्लानिंग के बारे में सोच
सकते हैं कि तय समय में मामलों का निपटारा हो।
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Rs. 616 Crore is not tiny amount in the country where people like us dying of
hunger. There is no two square meal for our family members. There are no means
of livelihood for us and government is facing crunch of resources in providing
us means of livelihood and in this situation public fund is outflowing for
those purposes which are not transparent and accountable.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
in order to win the confidence of common people of this country ,an independent
credible agency may look into the entire episode and may give the clean chit
otherwise only to say that people still have faith in judiciary. Every one
knows that all are innocent unless otherwise is proved but undoubtedly
credibility is under cloud. Honesty is not to say but it must be reflected in
the working style of public authority.
                          
 This is humble request of your appellant to you Hon’ble
Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by
delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is
sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of
loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice.
Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown
anarchy in the system. For this your appellant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
           
           
            
 ‘Yours  sincerely
           
                Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile
number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
Hon’ble Sir whether any action was taken by the concerned on the
representation dated-20/03/2016.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
29/04/2016
    to presidentofind., pmosb, supremecourt, urgent-action, cmup, hgovup, csup
It is unfortunate that representation dated 20/March/2016 of
your applicant was not taken seriously by concerned accountable public
functionaries. Hon’ble Sir Rs.1386 crore is huge amount spent by concerned in
making the new building for Lucknowbench of High court
of judicature at Allahabad.
29 April 2016
16:19
With due respect your applicant/petitioner
wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following
submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
whether any action taken by the concerned accountable public functionaries on
the following submitted grievance .
Please direct an independent credible agency to
look into the matter and make the report public.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Mar 20
to pmosb, presidentofind., supremecourt, urgent-action, cmup, hgovup
According to His Excellency ,estimate made
fornew building for Lucknow bench of High court of
judicature at Allahabad was Rs. 770 Crore in 2010 and it had to be completed
in  2014 but due to delay of near about one  year in its
completion ,it increased to Rs. 1386 Crore i.e. Additional burden of Rs. 616
Crore on public exchequer. As a citizen of this country under Article 51 (a)of
constitution of India ,seeks enquiry by an independent agency regarding this
huge expenditure.
20 March 2016
13:00
With due respect your appellant wants to draw
the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
please take a glance of published report in leading daily Amar Ujala in regard
to delivered speech of Hon’ble His Excellency-
राज्यपाल राम नाईकPC: amar ujala
राज्यपाल राम नाईक ने कहा कि न्याय प्रणाली के सामने शीघ्र
इंसाफ दिलाने की चुनौती है। तारीख पर तारीख लगने से वादकारियों की उम्मीदों को
झटका लगता है।
राज्य पाल राम नाईक लखनऊ में हाईकोर्ट
के नए भवन के उद्घाटना के अवसर पर बोल रहे थे। उन्होंने कहा
13 मार्च को इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट की 150वीं वर्षगांठ मनाई गई और आज लखनऊ बेंच के नए भवन का उद्घाटन हुआ है। इस
भव्य इमारत से लखनऊ को नई पहचान मिली है।
वर्ष 2010 में
इसकी लागत
 770 करोड़ रुपये आंकी गई थी और इसे2014 में पूरा होना था। निर्माण में दो साल देर होने से लागत 616करोड़ बढ़कर 1386 करोड़ रुपये हो गई।
समय से प्रोजेक्ट पूरा न होने को कॉमर्स की भाषा में टाइम
ओवर रन कहा जाता है। न्याय दिलाने में भी ऐसी प्लानिंग के बारे में सोच सकते हैं
कि तय समय में मामलों का निपटारा हो।
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Rs. 616 Crore is not tiny amount in the country where people like us dying of
hunger. There is no two square meal for our family members. There are no means
of livelihood for us and government is facing crunch of resources in providing
us means of livelihood and in this situation public fund is outflowing for
those purposes which are not transparent and accountable.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
in order to win the confidence of common people of this country ,an independent
credible agency may look into the entire episode and may give the clean chit
otherwise only to say that people still have faith in judiciary. Every one
knows that all are innocent unless otherwise is proved but undoubtedly
credibility is under cloud. Honesty is not to say but it must be reflected in
the working style of public authority.
2-It
is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 
Central Government Act, Article 51A in The
Constitution Of India 1949
51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of
India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions,
the national Flag and the National Anthem;
(b) to cherish and follow the noble ideals
which inspired our national struggle for freedom;
(c) to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and
integrity of India;
(d) to defend the country and render national service
when called upon to do so;
(e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common
brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic
and regional or sectional diversities;
 to renounce practices
derogatory to the dignity of women;
(f) to value and preserve the rich heritage of our
composite culture;
(g) to protect and improve the natural
environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have
compassion for living creatures;
(h) to develop the
scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of
individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to
higher levels of endeavour and achievement PART V THE UNION CHAPTER I THE
EXECUTIVE The President and Vice President
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
honesty is the best policy so if finger may be raised ,then transparency and
accountability may be ensured and each act may be subjected to the scrutiny of
people so faith of people may remain intact in the institution. Whether there
are 1386 rooms in the building and cost of construction of each court
room is Rs.1 crore rupees. Whatever is going on can’t be digested easily.
                          
 This is humble request of your appellant to you Hon’ble
Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by
delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is
sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of
loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice.
Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown
anarchy in the system. For this your appellant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                      ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi
M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .

2 comments on No action is taken on the representations in judiciary even if matter be concerned with larger public interest

  1. According to His Excellency ,estimate made for new building for Lucknowbench of High court of judicature at Allahabad was Rs. 770 Crore in 2010 and it had to be completed in 2014 but due to delay of near about one year in its completion ,it increased to Rs. 1386 Crore i.e. Additional burden of Rs. 616 Crore on public exchequer. As a citizen of this country under Article 51 (a)of constitution of India ,seeks enquiry by an independent agency regarding this huge expenditure.

  2. राज्य पाल राम नाईक लखनऊ में हाईकोर्ट के नए भवन के उद्घाटना के अवसर पर बोल रहे थे। उन्होंने कहा, 13 मार्च को इलाहाबाद हाईकोर्ट की 150वीं वर्षगांठ मनाई गई और आज लखनऊ बेंच के नए भवन का उद्घाटन हुआ है। इस भव्य इमारत से लखनऊ को नई पहचान मिली है।

    वर्ष 2010 में इसकी लागत 770 करोड़ रुपये आंकी गई थी और इसे 2014 में पूरा होना था। निर्माण में दो साल देर होने से लागत 616 करोड़ बढ़कर 1386 करोड़ रुपये हो गई।

    समय से प्रोजेक्ट पूरा न होने को कॉमर्स की भाषा में टाइम ओवर रन कहा जाता है। न्याय दिलाने में भी ऐसी प्लानिंग के बारे में सोच सकते हैं कि तय समय में मामलों का निपटारा हो।

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: