My inner conscious don’t allow to attend the appeals fixed for hearing on 5-May-2015.

My inner conscious don’t allow to attend the appeals fixed for hearing on 5-May-2015 in the information commissioner Mr. Gajendra Yadav court.

  

Add star  

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

AttachmentSun, May 3, 2015 at 11:18 PM
To: “sec.sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>
Since all the concerned accountable public functionaries remained failed in providing justice against the tyranny and arbitrary decision of Information Commissioner Mr. Gajendra Yadav so your applicant  boycott his court on 5-May-2015 as plea of your applicant Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:43 AM was overlooked by 
C.I.C. Of UPSIC.
Hon’ble Sir-Please take a glance of plea dated Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:43 AM as
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant is too much aggrieved with such cryptic dealing so consequently decided that aforesaid cases fixed for hearing in the court of Mr. Gajendra Yadav on 5-May-2015 be transferred to the court of chief information commissioner of Government of Uttar Pradesh in the interest of justice.
Hon’ble Sir-What was wrong if Hon’ble chief information commissioner may hear my complaints on 5-May-2015 which were languishing in the commission headed by him since several years. Now his companion Hon’ble commissioner will have full freedom to free erring public information officers in the absence of appellant which is usual practice.
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of representation dated Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:43 AM as follows-
Whether a information seeker can be pressurized to seek information in Hindi.
  
Yogi M. P. Singh
Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:43 AM
Whether a information seeker can be pressurized to seek information in Hindi.
08 March 2015
09:29
T0
                            Hon’ble Chief Information Commission ,
                             Government of Uttar Pradesh , Indira Bhawan
                                          Lucknow (U.P.)
Hon’ble Sir-Following cases ,
Yogi M. P. Singh               versus                       C.R.O. /PIO Collectorate       S-11-173/C/2010    Mirzapur
Yogi M. P. Singh               versus                       C.R.O. /PIO Collectorate       S-11-1410/C/2010    Mirzapur
Yogi M. P. Singh               versus                              C.D.O. Mirzapur        S-11-408/C/2011            Mirzapur
Yogi M. P. Singh               versus                                B.S.A. Mirzapur        S-11-856/C/2011           Mirzapur
Were fixed for hearing in the UPSIC  on 27/11/2014 before the court of Mr. Gajendra Yadav in which after detail hearing following order was passed by aforesaid Hon’ble information commissioner………
It is directed to complainant that Hindi version of the RTI communique be made available to all concerned PIOs and next date 5-May-2015 is fixed for hearing.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that subsection (1) section (6). Request for obtaining information.—(/) A person, who desires to obtain any information under this Act, shall make a request in writing or through electronic means inEnglish or Hindi or in the official language of the area in which the application is being made, accompanying such fee as may be prescribed, to—
Whether it is justified to seek Hindi version of R.T.I. Communique from your applicant at this stage of processing of the case. Whether such act is not ultravires to the provisions Right to Information Act 2005.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that during earlier hearing aforesaid information commissioner passed the order that now last chance is given to concerned PIOs , if they will not appear before the commission on fixed date  27/11/2014  to explain its stand then order will be passed to recover the imposed penalties from the salary of concerned PIOs. Most surprising that no PIO appeared in person before commission on 27/11/2014,then how it can justified that teeth -less commission may ask your applicant to made available Hindi version of R.T.I. Cmmunique which is ultravires to R.T.I. Act 2005.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant is too much aggrieved with such cryptic dealing so consequently decided that aforesaid cases fixed for hearing in the court of Mr. Gajendra Yadav on 5-May-2015 be transferred to the court of chief information commissioner of Government of Uttar Pradesh in the interest of justice.
                            
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
Created with Microsoft Office OneNote 2007
One place for all your notes and information
Whether a information seeker can.one
  2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Hon’ble Sir may take a glance of attachment in the PDF form containing 18 pages with this e-mail representation, categorically showing that our state is governed by lawlessness and sheer anarchy. Whether  this is not corruption that erring PIOs who are floating all set up standard norms and violating the provisions of Right to Information are not being subjected to penal action because of tacit understanding between them and accountable public functionaries in the state.
  3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Whether this is not criminal breach of trust that information commissioner once impose the penalty after number of hearings but latter revoke it in the absence of complainants by colluding with the corrupt staff of Government.
 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
When the UPSIC itself doesn’t regard the provisions of Right to Information Act ,then how can it be instrumental in providing sought information  to information seeker? The goal of transparency act is to enhance transparency and accountability in the working of public authority but when there is no transparency and accountability in the working of UPSIC itself ,then how such constitutional institution may be instrumental in ensuring transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities in the state.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                           ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .


causelist.pdf
21K View as HTML Download

4 comments on My inner conscious don’t allow to attend the appeals fixed for hearing on 5-May-2015.

  1. Since all the concerned accountable public functionaries remained failed in providing justice against the tyranny and arbitrary decision of Information Commissioner Mr. Gajendra Yadav so your applicant boycott his court on 5-May-2015 as plea of your applicant Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:43 AM was overlooked by
    C.I.C. Of UPSIC.

  2. It is most surprising that this demand is the right of an information seeker and concerned public functionaries by not accepting such genuine demand only showed their real face. It is true that in the presence of Information seeker they couldn't close the complaint so they were in search of appropriate opportunity so cases could be closed without penalizing erring PIOs.

  3. Hon'ble member you are quite right that since long time they were waiting appropriate opportunity to close the cases and complaint number 169/2009 was closed when I reached late in the commission and when I asked about the case ,then commissioner told me since sought information made available so I disposed the case then I made objection on it ,then he said after completion of all cases I will take up your case. Latter I was told that case is being fixed for hearing along with all your cases.But on next hearing all cases were listed but the file missing was not listed.

  4. Very correct. Mr Gajendra Yadav is not working professionally. He is not doing work to relief general public. in my case I provide 3 PODs of receiving even he refused to order police authority to provide information. very Unfortunate.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: