My grievance submitted on 08/09/2015 being processed by administrative judge,MZP as complaint number-X-39/24E/16

Grievance Status
Registration Number
:
DEPOJ/E/2015/01353
Name Of Complainant
:
Yogi
M P Singh
Date of Receipt
:
08
Sep 2015
Received by
:
Department
of Justice
Officer name
:
Shri
Atul Kaushik
Officer Designation
:
Joint
Secretary,
Contact Address
:
Jaisalmer
House,
Mansingh
Road,
New
Delhi110011
Contact Number
:
23385020
Grievance Description
:
Persecution
by the court of A.C.J.M. First Mirzapur of your applicant is sheer illegal
and unconstitutional . Whether it is justified that on the each fixed date ,
Judge may overlook the case of your applicant in the morning session and hear
when entire business of court may be over. Consequently your applicant has to
spend entire day in the premises of the court. As a formality in order to
request of your applicant , call is made by the court attendant repeatedly
but matter is taken up when no business of court remains. Whether such
arbitrary act of A.C.J.M. First Mirzapur is not violating the human rights of
your applicant. Matter is concerned with the court of Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate first Mirzapur i.e. A.C.J.M. (First) Court District-Mirzapur
. State-Uttar Pradesh, India . Criminal Complaint NO. -2315/07 Complainant-
Santish Dhar Dubey S/O -Mr. Shiva Nath Dubey Vill+P.O.-Nibee Gaharwar Police
station-Vindhyachal Dist-Mirzapur ,Uttar Pradesh Defendant – Yogi M. P. Singh
S/O -Shree Rajendra Pratap Singh Moh-Surekapuram ,Jabalpur Road Police
station-Katra Kotwali Dist-Mirzapur ,Uttar Pradesh Prayer-Plea of your
applicant dated Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:58 AM which was sent to D.J./A.C.J.M.
First Mirzapur on 07/03/2015 by your applicant by duly signing each page of
application along with annexures may not be overlooked by A.C.J.M. Mirzapur
on flimsy ground. Prayer of aforesaid application is as follows – Whether a
summon case can be processed under section 244 of Cr.P.C. And plea of defendant
can be overlooked by taking the recourse of aforesaid section under which
warrant cases instituted otherwise than on a police report are processed.
Please take a glance of attached scanned copy of aforesaid application. With
due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble
Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the
Hon’ble Sir that Whether in the name of independence of judiciary tyranny can
be allowed. Whether it is justified to process a summon case under section
244 of criminal penal code. On 6-March-2015 your applicant submitted
grievance for redressal before various accountable public functionaries
including Additional chief judicial magistrate first Mirzapur. On
17-April-2015 he partly heard the matter and asked me what is the difference
if complaint is processed under section 244 and onward instead of chapter 20
of criminal procedure code. I replied that since my plea is not being
considered by the Hon’ble court so in the interest of justice ,please pursue
the chapter xx of Cr. P. C. . He called on counsel for complainants but his
junior told him that he is busy in the another court. Counsel for complainant
with half a dozen juniors entered into court at 3 PM . But A.C.J.M. First
Mirzapur had joined at that day so seniors were inviting in their chambers
and juniors were coming to his chamber. As he made the mood to hear case ,he
was invited by C.J.M. Mirzapur. He returned back at 4:15 and told us that
after taking a glance of the file , hearing will take place on next fixed
date as fixed by him 22-May-2015. On 22-May-2015 ,junior was asked to inform
his senior to argue in the case. Senior counsel Mr. Kripa
Current Status
:
RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE
Status as on 08 Sep 2015

4 comments on My grievance submitted on 08/09/2015 being processed by administrative judge,MZP as complaint number-X-39/24E/16

  1. Persecution by the court of A.C.J.M. First Mirzapur of your applicant is sheer illegal and unconstitutional . Whether it is justified that on the each fixed date , Judge may overlook the case of your applicant in the morning session and hear when entire business of court may be over. Consequently your applicant has to spend entire day in the premises of the court.

  2. On 17-April-2015 he partly heard the matter and asked me what is the difference if complaint is processed under section 244 and onward instead of chapter 20 of criminal procedure code. It is most unfortunate that first class magistrate of government of India don't know the difference between section 244 of criminal procedure code under which warrant cases are processed and chapter 20 of Criminal procedure code from section 251 to on-wards under which summon cases are processed.

  3. Difference if complaint is processed under section 244 and onward instead of chapter 20 of criminal procedure code. It is most unfortunate that first class magistrate of government of India don’t know the difference between section 244 of criminal procedure code under which warrant cases are processed and chapter 20 of Criminal procedure code from section 251 to on-wards under which summon cases are processed.

  4. Behaviour of the court which means behaviour of the presiding officer at the court is quite unsatisfactory because he does not know the difference between criminal panel code 244 and chapter 20 of the criminal panel code former for warrant cases and later for summon cases. it is most unfortunate nothing was done by them.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: