Mockery of R.T.I. Act 2005 by the CPIO in Prime Minister’s Office in order to conceal lacunae

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Online appeal application submitted

1 message

Central Information Commission (CIC) <no-reply@nic.in>
13 October 2018 at 01:27
To: yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Cc: feedback-cic@gov.in
Dear Yogi M P Singh,
Your online appeal is diarised. Details are given below:
1
Diary Number
633469
2
Diary date
13-10-2018
Please logon to : www.cic.gov.in for any further details.
Regards,
Central Information Commission (CIC)

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Mockery of R.T.I. Act 2005 by the CPIO Prime Minister’s Office in order to conceal lacunae.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 12 October 2018 at 23:14

To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, registrar-cic@nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in

An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 against the denial of sought information by Praveen Kumar Undersecretary and CPIO in the Prime Minister’s Office.
To
                               Hon’ble Chief Information Commissioner of India
                                             Central Information Commission
                                               Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                                                New Delhi Pin code-110067
Appellant-Yogi M. P. Singh S/O Rajendra Pratap Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, PIN code-231001.
Versus
Respondent-1- Praveen Kumar Under Secretary
and CPIO in the Prime Minister’s Office,
South Block, New Delhi-110011.
2- Director and Appellate Authority
 in the Prime Minister’s Office,
South Block, New Delhi-110011.
Subject-CPIO through its communication dated 17/05/2018 addressed to appellant, denied the sought information on the flimsy and cryptic grounds and in a mischievous way. He must be subjected to scrutiny under section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005 of India.
First appellate authority instead of applying own rational mind, only copied the irrational decision of CPIO so disciplinary proceedings may be initiated against him so that such practice of non-providing sought information to information seekers may be curbed.
With due respect and regard to Hon’ble Sir, the appellant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your appellant sought the following information from the CPIO.
1-CPIO may provide the noting in regard to attached representation dated 11/03/2016 and 17/09/2014 and name and designation of public staffs processed them.
2-Please provide the action taken report on the aforementioned submitted complaints and if forwarded somewhere else, then under subsection 3 of section 6 for information.
2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that CPIO Praveen Kumar through its reply dated-17/05/2018 addressed to appellant denied the sought information on the ground that aforementioned sought information is not clear.
3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that as aforementioned CPIO had sought the resend of the application specifying the information so the appellant submitted following e-mail representation
Regarding the R.T.I. Application registered on the portal as PMOIN/R/2018/52012 and subsequent communication dated 17/05/2018 of under secretary & CPIO. 1 message Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 29 May 2018 at 10:15 To: rti-pmo.applications@gov.in, rti.appeal@gov.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action urgent-action@ohchr.org
4-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that when the information was not made available by the CPIO then appellant submitted the first appeal before aforementioned first appellate authority and aforementioned e-mail representation as supportive document.
5-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that First appellate authority instead of applying own rational mind, only copied the irrational decision of CPIO so disciplinary proceedings may be initiated against him so that such practice of non-providing sought information to information seekers may be curbed.
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                             Yours sincerely
Date-12-10-2018              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.


6 attachments
Online RTI Appeal Form Details and its status.pdf
401K
Online RTI Request Form Details and its status.pdf
408K
Reply of FAA PMO.pdf
250K
Reply of CPIO PMO.pdf
122K
Supporting documents with First appeal.pdf
201K
Supporting documents with RTI request.pdf
704K

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

CPIO through its communication dated 17/05/2018 addressed to appellant, denied the sought information on the flimsy and cryptic grounds and in a mischievous way. He must be subjected to scrutiny under section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005 of India.
First appellate authority instead of applying own rational mind, only copied the irrational decision of CPIO so disciplinary proceedings may be initiated against him so that such practice of non-providing sought information to information seekers may be curbed.

Arun Pratap Singh
1 year ago

Undoubtedly the matter is serious because concerned with the non compliance of provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 by the prime minister office.