Matter was forwarded to principal secretary/secretary Information ,Government of Uttar Pradesh.

आवेदन का विवरण
शिकायत संख्या
40015716002608
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
Yogi M P Singh
विषय:
Registrar Uttar
Pradesh State Information Commission again made the mockery of Right to
Information Act 2005According to Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information
Commission ,on scrutiny of appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19
on date 28032016 by your applicant following defect were traced-There is no
time span of 30 days between date when first appeal filed and the date when
second appeal submitted But the actual fact is that if the date of sending
first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 4 days and if the
date of delivery of first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1
month 3 days Consequently the second appeal submitted by your applicant was
returned back by him on this flimsy ground With due respect your applicantpetitioner
wants to draw the kind attention of the Honble Sir to the following
submissions as follows 1-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that generally
in the courts time barred appealwrits are not accepted unless the delay is
not condoned by the courts This is first time in the history, an accountable
officer of quasi judicial court rejected the appeal that it is premature
before the commission The role of the commission is to be instrumental to
information seeker in seeking information instead of creating a blockade in
the path of information seeker 2-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that
first page of PDF attachment is the letter of registrar of Uttar Pradesh
State Information Commission accepting that my second appeal was submitted before
the commission on 28032016 Second and third page of the PDF attachment are
showing that my speed registered post was sent on 24022016 and delivered on
25022016 in the office of superintendent of police Fourth and fifth page of
this PDF attachment with this representation are showing that appeal under
subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 is dated 24022016
3-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that now
नियत तिथि:
22 – May – 2016
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ का प्रकार
आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश दिनांक
अधिकारी को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
नियत दिनांक
स्थिति
आख्या रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन
सन्दर्भ
07
– May – 2016
प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव सूचना
22
– May – 2016
लंबित

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Initially your applicant was surprised to know that registrar is zero in regard to knowledge of laws but now confirm that he is zero in the knowledge of elementary arithmetic
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:12 PM
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>, “sec.sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, secy-cic <secy-cic@nic.in>, dhirendra.k@nic.in

Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission again made the mockery of Right to Information Act 2005.
06 May 2016
18:20
According to Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission ,on scrutiny of appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 on date 28/03/2016 by your applicant following defect were traced-There is no time span of 30 days between date when first appeal filed and the date when second appeal submitted.Consequently the second appeal submitted by your applicant was returned back by him on this flimsy ground .
With due respect your applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that generally in the courts time barred appeal/writs are not accepted unless the delay is not condoned by the courts. This is first time in the history, an accountable officer of quasi judicial court rejected  the appeal that it is premature before the commission. The role of the commission is to be instrumental to information seeker in seeking information instead of creating a blockade in the path of information seeker.
 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  first page of PDF attachment is the letter of registrar of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission accepting that my second appeal was submitted before the commission on 28/03/2016 .
Second and third page of the PDF attachment are showing that my speed registered post was sent on 24/02/2016 and delivered on 25/02/2016 in the office of superintendent of police .
Fourth and fifth page of this PDF attachment with this representation are showing that appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 is dated 24/02/2016.
 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that now your applicant wants to do elementary calculation which couldn’t be done by Registrar ,Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission-
Date
Month
Year   
28
03
2016
24
02
2016
04
01
0000
Date
Month
Year
28
03
2016
25
02
2016
03
01
0000
Initially your applicant was surprised to know that  registrar is zero in regard to knowledge of laws but now confirm that  he is zero in the knowledge  of elementary arithmetic  .
                 
This is humble request of your appellant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your appellant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                      ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India 


Mockery of Right to Information Act 2005 by Registrar UPSIC..pdf
447K

EU468028609IN  
Booked at
Booked On
Destination 
Pincode
Tariff
Article 
Category
Delivered at
Delivered on
Not Available
Not Available
Not Availa
Not availa
Not Available
MIRZAPUR H.O (231001)
25/02/2016
Detailed Track Events For EU468028609IN  
Date
Time
Office
Event
24/02/2016
19:09:23
ICH MIRZAPUR
Item Received
25/02/2016
01:53:05
ICH MIRZAPUR
Item bagged for MIRZAPUR H.O
25/02/2016
03:37:30
ICH MIRZAPUR
Bag Despatched to MIRZAPUR
H.O
25/02/2016
08:11:10
MIRZAPUR H.O
Bag Received
25/02/2016
08:20:10
MIRZAPUR H.O
Bag Opened
25/02/2016
08:20:11
MIRZAPUR H.O
Item Received
25/02/2016
15:59:00
MIRZAPUR H.O
Item Delivered

2 comments on Matter was forwarded to principal secretary/secretary Information ,Government of Uttar Pradesh.

  1. Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission again made the mockery of Right to Information Act 2005According to Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission ,on scrutiny of appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 on date 28032016 by your applicant following defect were traced-There is no time span of 30 days between date when first appeal filed and the date when second appeal submitted But the actual fact is that if the date of sending first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 4 days and if the date of delivery of first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 3 days Consequently the second appeal submitted by your applicant was returned back by him on this flimsy ground

  2. आवेदन का विवरण
    शिकायत संख्या 40015716002608
    आवेदक कर्ता का नाम: Yogi M P Singh
    विषय: Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission again made the mockery of Right to Information Act 2005According to Registrar Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission ,on scrutiny of appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 on date 28032016 by your applicant following defect were traced-There is no time span of 30 days between date when first appeal filed and the date when second appeal submitted But the actual fact is that if the date of sending first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 4 days and if the date of delivery of first appeal be considered ,then this time span is 1 month 3 days Consequently the second appeal submitted by your applicant was returned back by him on this flimsy ground With due respect your applicantpetitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Honble Sir to the following submissions as follows 1-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that generally in the courts time barred appealwrits are not accepted unless the delay is not condoned by the courts This is first time in the history, an accountable officer of quasi judicial court rejected the appeal that it is premature before the commission The role of the commission is to be instrumental to information seeker in seeking information instead of creating a blockade in the path of information seeker 2-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that first page of PDF attachment is the letter of registrar of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission accepting that my second appeal was submitted before the commission on 28032016 Second and third page of the PDF attachment are showing that my speed registered post was sent on 24022016 and delivered on 25022016 in the office of superintendent of police Fourth and fifth page of this PDF attachment with this representation are showing that appeal under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 is dated 24022016 3-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that now
    नियत तिथि: 22 – May – 2016
    शिकायत की स्थिति: लम्बित
    अग्रसारित विवरण-
    क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश आख्या नियत दिनांक स्थिति आख्या रिपोर्ट
    1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 07 – May – 2016 प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव -सूचना — 22 – May – 2016 लंबित

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: