Matter is subjected to the contract between two companies not consumers .

Matter is subjected to the contract between two companies not consumers so consumers may not be subjected to ill treatment of staffs of either of the parties.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Attachments11:01 PM (7 minutes ago)

to hgovupcmupurgent-action
Franchisee of U.P.P.C.L. in Mirzapur district concerned with Chunar Tahsil didn’t deposit the bill deposited by consumers and collected by staffs of Franchisee in the month of April 2015 amounted to Rs. 1497125.00 .
13 March 2016
21:08
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that U.P.P.C.L. may clarify its stand that whether consumers once paid bill will not be harassed in the name that their bill was not deposited by franchisee . There is no credibility of U.P.P.C.L. Staff as they can say to consumers that their dues is still unpaid so they may deposit the bill with surcharge.
 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that there is too much tyranny in the department of U.P.P.C.L. as your applicant already faced. Clerk will say that I will only follow the ledger book nothing else. Go and take back your paid amount from franchisee .
 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that franchisee A.K. Messers trading company was provided franchise regarding the collection of electricity bill of financial year 2014-2015 of Chunar urban area as well as rural area and bill collected by company was not deposited in the month of April ,then who is faulty/defaulter  ? If the defaulter is the staffs of company ,then company may lodge F.I.R. Against its staff not cashier of U.P.P.C.L. . Here contract is between U.P.P.C.L. And aforesaid company and action against company staff will be taken by company itself. Dues of U.P.P.C.L. Will be paid by company through its infrastructure.
Statutory Liability:
Misleading Prospectus- 
A director is liable to compensate a person who has subscribed shares on the faith of a prospectus, which contained untrue statement. The Director should compensate every such subscriber for any loss or damage he may have sustained by reason of such untrue statement in an action in tort and also under section 62 of the Act to pay compensate. If the Director discovers a mistake in the prospectus, it is his duty to specifically point it out. The Director may also have to face criminal prosecution for untrue statement in the prospectus. He may be imprisoned for two years and fined Rs.5000.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                    ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
Sent from Mail for Windows 10

2 comments on Matter is subjected to the contract between two companies not consumers .

  1. Hon'ble Sir that franchisee A.K. Messers trading company was provided franchise regarding the collection of electricity bill of financial year 2014-2015 of Chunar urban area as well as rural area and bill collected by company was not deposited in the month of April ,then who is faulty/defaulter ? If the defaulter is the staffs of company ,then company may lodge F.I.R. Against its staff not cashier of U.P.P.C.L. . Here contract is between U.P.P.C.L. And aforesaid company and action against company staff will be taken by company itself. Dues of U.P.P.C.L. Will be paid by company through its infrastructure.

  2. Hon'ble Sir that U.P.P.C.L. may clarify its stand that whether consumers once paid bill will not be harassed in the name that their bill was not deposited by franchisee . There is no credibility of U.P.P.C.L. Staff as they can say to consumers that their dues is still unpaid so they may deposit the bill with surcharge.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: