Matter concerned with highhandedness of minister with police in Uttar Pradesh diarised in Apex court

Diary
No.
63222/SCI/PIL(E)/2019
Application
Date
17-11-2019
Received
On
06-12-2019
Applicant
Name
MAHESH
PRATAP SINGH YOGI MP0 SINGH
Address
SUREKAPURAM
JABALPUR ROAD DISTRICT MIRZAPUR
State
UTTAR
PRADESH
Action
Taken
UNDER
PROCESS

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Apex court of India must curb the political interference in the working of the police.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 17 November 2019 at 12:04
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com, nch-ca@gov.in

swati-singh-1573964513.jpg
मोदी सर की इमेज को गहरा धक्का लगा समाजवादी पार्टी को नजराना और शुकराना जैसे चुने हुए शब्दों के भाषण से सत्ता से हटाने वाले प्रधान मंत्री सर को जब यह मालुम होगा की उनकी भी सरकार के नुमाइंदे वही कार्यशैली पसंद करते है तो उन्हें कितना झटका लगेगा |
Troubles for Uttar Pradesh Minister, Swati Singh, are far from over. The minister was pulled up by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath after an audio clip, in which she is heard threatening a police officer and demanding that the case against a builder be expunged, went viral.
The builder, in whose favour the minister was pressuring the circle officer of Cantt police station, Beenu Singh, to withdraw the cases, is the Ansal group which is already involved in a fraud case.
On September 29, real estate group Ansal API’s vice-chairman Pranav Ansal was detained at Delhi airport while he was about to fly to London, in connection with cases pertaining to criminal breach of trust, cheating, and forgery. Ansal was later brought to Lucknow and sent to jail.
Even though Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, on Saturday, initially chided her and then ordered an inquiry into the audio clip. He is believed to have conveyed his displeasure over Swati’s behaviour to the party high command and is awaiting their decision.
Opposition parties in Uttar Pradesh have seized this opportunity to hit out at the Yogi Adityanath government.
The Samajwadi Party issued a statement saying that the incident showcased the corruption rampant in the Yogi government where a minister is heard openly talking in favour of a tainted builder.
The Congress went a step ahead and demanded the dismissal of Swati Singh from the ministry. Uttar Pradesh Congress Committee president Ajay Kumar Lallu said: “Uttar Pradesh minister is threatening Lucknow Cantt Circle Officer to favour a scamsters. She is even heard saying that the chief minister is apprised of the matter and the orders are coming from the top. This explains the kind of government we have in the state. If Yogi Adityanath is genuinely committed to checking corruption, he should dismiss this minister.”
A former BJP leader I. P. Singh, who has now joined the Samajwadi Party, said that such elements were demolishing the BJP’s claim of being a party with a difference. “If police officials are being asked by ministers to work against the law, one can imagine the state of affairs.
Swati Singh, meanwhile, has refused to comment on the episode and even rebuked journalists who approached her for a reaction.
 A representation under article 32 of the constitution of India to seek interference of court to curb the political interference in the working of the police causing great damage to constitutional and human rights of the citizens in the state of Uttar Pradesh.
To                           
                                             Hon’ble Chief Justice of India/ companion judges
                                                     Apex court of Judicature in India.
                                                                New Delhi, India
An application under Article 51 A of the constitution to enquire into the matter concerned with the state minister Swati Singh who is under the scrutiny of media of this largest democracy in the world and media is considered as the fourth pillar of this democracy.
With due respect, your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1- Media alleged that Swati Singh made/created undue pressure on the circle officer Cantt Lucknow police in order to pressurise her to get undue favour.
2- Prima facie it was found that tape is not manipulated, the tape which was provided to the media and primary enquiry is genuine quite obvious from the videos available on various social networking sites.
3- Swati Singh blatantly abused its post by pressurizing the police not to lodge FIR against the erring Builder who was already jailed because of its illegal activities even when police had reached its conclusion after thorough investigation quite obvious from the conversation of the alleged tape. Undoubtedly a Minister can reprimand subordinate police officer for just and fair work if being overlooked.
4- Whether to take police under pressure in order to to provide a reprieve to wrongdoer real estate company can never be justified even when police had already lodged First Information Report and the alleged minister was pressurizing the police to cancel the first information report against the wrongdoer builder company which integrity is already under a cloud.
5- it is most unfortunate that circle officer Cantt was taken under influence by the alleged minister by taking the name of chief minister of the state whether it is justified? As far as my knowledge is concerned department of police comes under the purview of Chief Minister of the state as this portfolio is not provided to any minister by the Chief Minister of the Government of Uttar Pradesh which shows that alleged Minister was interfering in the work of chief minister of government of Uttar Pradesh and impeding the process of Investigation going on against the alleged builder can never be in accordance with the rule of law consequently action is must in order to maintain the dignity and win the confidence of the people.
This is a humble request of the applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is the need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                         
                                                                              Yours sincerely
Date-17-11-2019              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

4 comments on Matter concerned with highhandedness of minister with police in Uttar Pradesh diarised in Apex court

  1. What action was taken by Yogi Adityanath government in the state against his minister who indulged in highhandedness with the police in order to get matter concerned with a builder expunge ipso facto obvious.
    मोदी सर की इमेज को गहरा धक्का लगा समाजवादी पार्टी को नजराना और शुकराना जैसे चुने हुए शब्दों के भाषण से सत्ता से हटाने वाले प्रधान मंत्री सर को जब यह मालुम होगा की उनकी भी सरकार के नुमाइंदे वही कार्यशैली पसंद करते है तो उन्हें कितना झटका लगेगा |
    Troubles for Uttar Pradesh Minister, Swati Singh, are far from over. The minister was pulled up by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath after an audio clip, in which she is heard threatening a police officer and demanding that the case against a builder be expunged, went viral.

  2. Undoubtedly corruption is deep rooted in this country and even apex court of India is not spared of it. Think about the gravity of situation that lady minister of the Yogi Adityanath cabinet is pressurizing circle officer Cantt not too large the FIR against a builder such patronage by a Minister of Yogi Adityanath cabinet to a builder in order to make the cases against the Builder sponge is justified? Here this question arises that why our chief minister is mute spectator of this incidence why legitimate action is not being taken against the lady minister.

  3. Swati Singh blatantly abused its post by pressurizing the police not to lodge FIR against the erring Builder who was already jailed because of its illegal activities even when police had reached its conclusion after thorough investigation quite obvious from the conversation of the alleged tape. Undoubtedly a Minister can reprimand subordinate police officer for just and fair work if being overlooked.
    If it is not anarchy, then it is not less than anarchy.

  4. It is most unfortunate that circle officer Cantt was taken under influence by the alleged minister by taking the name of chief minister of the state whether it is justified?
    Why matter was put under carpet and judiciary of the country remained mute spectator? Where is judicial activism which is glorified by the cryptic people to conceal the inert face of judiciary as judiciary of this country is failed one which crippled one and people of the country trembles in the name of judiciary. It seems that judiciary is not for the poor but entire corrupt people have good faith in the judiciary because they are set free in judiciary.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: