It seems that Uttar Pradesh police has been created to break the law of land and it is champion in this largest democracy

Registration Number PROLW/A/2020/60005
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 09-08-2020
Request filed with POLICE RANGE OFFICE LUCKNOW
 Contact Details  
Telephone Number 9415757521
Email-ID ojha1166@gmail.com
Registration Number PROLW/A/2020/60005
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 09/08/2020
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 09/08/2020
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9415757521
Email-ID ojha1166@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority POLICE RANGE OFFICE LUCKNOW
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number PROLW/R/2020/60002
Request Registration Date 04/06/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
* PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought RTI Communique had been submitted on 04 Jun 2020 and today is 09 Aug 2020. Which shows that concerned SPIO took under teeth subsection 1 of section 7 of RTI Act 2005.I

t seems that State Public Information Officer and Nodal officer both have promised to non-entertaining the online applications.

As well as other applications obtained through post under R.T.I. Act of 2005 are facing same treatment.

Even processing of the communiqués is not being done.

At least they may be afraid of God as no one will be spared from ultimate penal action.

God is almighty. Now it has been a trend that State Public Information Officer in the Government of Uttar Pradesh is not providing any information under Right to Information act 2005.

Everyone knows that under subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information act 2005 State Public Information Officer had to provide information within 30 days from the date of receipt of the RTI communique in its office.

Whatever applications are being submitted by the information seeker online on the portal of government of Uttar Pradesh. These applications are not entertained by the concerned State Public Information Officers. Such practice is is quite rampant on the portal.

As well. as those communications which are being sent physically through the post. This anarchy is created because of the non-recovery of imposed penalty by the state Information Commission on the Public Information Officers.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
Registration Number PROLW/R/2020/60002
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 04/06/2020
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 04/06/2020
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9415757521
Email-ID ojha1166@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority POLICE RANGE OFFICE LUCKNOW
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number PROLW/R/2020/60002
Date of Filing 04/06/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought Order of High court attached to communiqué and quote is as-

It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase.

So that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house.

She may take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court.

 After that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere.

Sought Information-

1-Provide the order of the competent court as ordered aforementioned.

2-C.O. Cantt may provide information about, how Ashiyana police station is equipped with powers of a civil court.

3-High court categorically stated in its order to seek civil remedy.

But subsequent proceedings are criminal and Dr Beenu Singh instigating illegally to participate in it. Provide reason.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Beerbhadra Singh
3 months ago

Whether it is not the mockery of the law of land? Procrastination of concerned public functionaries implies it is quite obvious that there is rampant corruption in the department of police and such corruption must be curbed at any cost. Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad has explicitly stated in its order that aggrieved lady Anuradha Singh may seek civil remedy from the appropriate Court but Lucknow police provided this lady criminal remedy which is the mockery of the law of land.

Pratima Parihar
Pratima Parihar
3 months ago

आरटीआई प्रार्थनापत्र 04 जून 2020 को प्रस्तुत की गई थी और आज 09 अगस्त 2020 है, जो दर्शाता है कि संबंधित एसपीआईओ ने आरटीआई अधिनियम 2005 की धारा 7 के उपधारा 1 का उल्लंघन किया है । ऐसा प्रत्यक्ष है कि राज्य लोक सूचना अधिकारी और नोडल अधिकारी दोनों ने जनसूचना आवेदन को छुआ ही नही है ऑनलाइन आवेदन के साथ-साथ 2005 के आरटीआई अधिनियम के तहत पोस्ट के माध्यम से प्राप्त अन्य आवेदन। का प्रसंस्करण भी नहीं किया जा रहा है। कम से कम भगवान से डरो क्योंकि किसी को भी उनके दंडात्मक कार्रवाई से बख्शा नहीं जाएगा।

Bhoomika Singh
3 months ago

Think about the gravity of situation that Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad is stating in its order that aggrieved lady Anuradha Singh alias Aradhana Singh alias Guddi may seek the the Civil remedy from the appropriate Court which confirms that matter is concerned with civil procedure not criminal procedure but the Lucknow police as well as home secretary government of Uttar Pradesh made the mockery of this order and lodged the FIR against the Dinesh Pratap Singh and his wife and daughter as well and the entire family terrorized such a manner that they left the house and entire house was grabbed by cheaters by colluding with police.

Arun Pratap Singh
3 months ago

It seems that Uttar Pradesh police has been created to break the law of land and it is champion in this largest democracy.
जब माननीय उच्च न्यायालय की लखनऊ बेंच की एकल पीठ ने अपने निर्णय में अनुराधा सिंह / आराधना सिंह / गुड्डी को निर्देशित किया की दरवाजे की कुंडी खोल दिया जाय जिससे उपरोक्त बहु नाम वाली महिला किसी सक्षम न्यायालय से सिविल रेमेडी हासिल करे और उसके बाद वह सिविल रेमेडी लखनऊ पुलिस की आशियाना थाने ने गंभीर धाराओं में केस रजिस्टर कर दिया और दिनेश प्रताप सिंह का परिवार मकान छोड़ कर भाग खडा हुआ और खुद दिनेश प्रताप सिंह को जेल में बंद कर दिया | सीधे तौर पर गृह सचिव , वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधीक्षक लखनऊ और थाना अध्यक्ष आशियाना ने न्यायालय अवमानना किया किन्तु ऐसा प्रतीत होता है की न्यायालय की व्यवस्था हाथी के दात के समान है |