It seems that president’s secretariat studying deeply as still didn’t reach on any conclusion.

Request/Grievance Status
LogOut
Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2016/12931
Print/View Grievance
Name : Nagendra Bahadur Singh
Date of Receipt : 01 Oct 2016
Current Status : President’s Secretariat has received the request/grievance
and is under examination
Note : For further action taken on this request/grievance, please check status after 7 days from date of receipt.

Grievance for Registration No: PRSEC/E/2016/12931

Your applicant wants to ask a simple question ,whether tower was the part of agreement if not then why installation was made and before installation approval of landlord was taken on a plane paper by assuring Rs.500 .00 increment in the rent of house . It is unfortunate that concerned bank staffs never kept their promise. 30 September 2016 19:32 With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of action detail of submitted online application registered on public grievance portal as Registration obvious from attached documents with this representation. The matter was take up with CO: Allahabad, they recommended to drop the matter since the complaint is not based on facts. Bank has never admitted to give rent for the RF tower installed at the roof, so Bank has never paid any rent for this and there is no rent due for RF tower. CO has also submitted that the RF tower has been removed from the roof since March 2016. The lease of the branch premises is executed on 01.03.2007 for 5+5 years. There is no rental dues. As such the matter is closed at ours. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that why concerned staffs of government of India is not looking into the facts that if the bank staffs can take rental from those who installed the tower by taking permission additionally from the landlord by assuring Rs. 500.00 increase in the lump some amount as rental per month ,then how the Land lord can be deprived from its share. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether the reply of concerned bank staffs is not cryptic in regard to following submissions under the aforesaid grievance. This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir. Yours sincerely Nagendra Bahadur Singh

3 comments on It seems that president’s secretariat studying deeply as still didn’t reach on any conclusion.

  1. Your applicant wants to ask a simple question ,whether tower was the part of agreement if not then why installation was made and before installation approval of landlord was taken on a plane paper by assuring Rs.500 .00 increment in the rent of house . It is unfortunate that concerned bank staffs never kept their promise

  2. Ipso facto obvious that nothing could be speculated till the stand of concerned be evident . If we take a glance of events taking place in our surroundings then ipso facto obvious that justice available to citizenry in the rarest of the rare cases. Dharma is the sole protector and now this sacred land of gods has been unholy.

  3. Submitted grievance is still under scrutiny by president secretariat .
    Registration Number : PRSEC/E/2016/12931
    Print/View Grievance
    Name : Nagendra Bahadur Singh
    Date of Receipt : 01 Oct 2016
    Current Status : President's Secretariat has received the request/grievance
    and is under examination
    Note : For further action taken on this request/grievance, please check status after 7 days from date of receipt.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: