Information sought with CPIO Vijaya bank on 28-08-2017, he denied four hours ago i.e.approx 3 months

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Illegal deduction from the account of Shakuntala Devi.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 22 January 2017 at 17:11
To: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, “csup@up.nic.in” <csup@up.nic.in>, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>

The matter is concerned with an illegal deduction from the account of your applicant Shakuntala Devi.
Account number -5021971866, Account holder-Shakuntala Devi, Allahabad Bank
Branch-Shivala Mahanth, District-Mirzapur. For details, please take a glance of the attached document with this representation.
Subject –Regarding the transaction dated 21-12-2016 which caused the deduction of Rs.2000.00 from the account of your applicant was actually a failed transaction.
With due respect, your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that aforesaid transaction was made by the son of your applicant through ATM HDFC Bank Dankeen Ganj, MIRZAPUR, WHEN demonetization wave was in full swing and long queues were quite common before the windows of Bank and bank ATMs. In those days, processing in ATMs was very slow and banks were facing the crunch of currencies.  
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that R.B.I. had directed to all the concerned banks in this country to protect the footage of C.C. T.V. consequently C.C. T.V. footage of aforesaid specific date can easily reveal the fact that whether the Son of your applicant drew the money or transaction remained failed.  
  3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that dealing of the branch manager of the bank concerned is quite cryptic ipso facto obvious from his dealings. Hon’ble Sir, we are poor and Rs.2000.00 is too much value to our family so there is need to take swift action in the matter concerned so your aggrieved applicant may get a reprieve.  How can it be justified that without paying the said amount to your applicant and by taking the recourse of failed transaction concerned banks may deduct the impugned amount? 
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of the citizenry by delivering services in an arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap the benefit of loopholes in the system and depriving poor citizens of the right to justice. Therefore it is need of the hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                 Yours  sincerely
                                                     Shakuntala Devi  Mobile number-8738895762

Mohalla-Shivala Mahanth, Post-Putalighar, District-Mirzapur, Pin Code-231001 Uttar Pradesh ,India 


Illegal deduction from the account of Shakuntala Devi.pdf
195K
Friday, November 24, 2017
11:06 PM
Enter Registration Number
VIJBK/A/2017/60045
Name
Shakuntala Devi
Date of filing
01/10/2017
Public Authority
Vijaya Bank
Status
RTI APPEAL RECEIVED
Date of action
01/10/2017
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number
8879704597
Email Id
ajoysenchakma@vijayabank.co.in

From <https://rtionline.gov.in/request/status.php>

Enter Registration Number
VIJBK/R/2017/50211
Name
Shakuntala Devi
Date of filing
28/08/2017
Public Authority
Vijaya Bank
Status
RTI REQUEST RECEIVED
Date of action
28/08/2017
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number
8879704597
Email Id
ajoysenchakma@vijayabank.co.in

From <https://rtionline.gov.in/request/status.php>

Online RTI Request Form Details 
RTI Request Details :-
RTI Request Registration number
VIJBK/R/2017/50211
Public Authority
Vijaya Bank
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Name
Shakuntala Devi
Gender
Female
Address
Shivala Mahanth Hathiya fatak , Post Putalighar, District Mirzapur
Pincode
231001
Country
India
State
Uttar Pradesh
Status
Urban
Educational Status
Illiterate
Phone Number
Details not provided
Mobile Number
+91-8738895762
Email-ID
yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship
Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ?
No
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
Description of Information Sought
Please provide the Video footage of transaction as sought by your applicant through the grievance but concerned staffs denied on flimsy ground. Grievance is attached with this communique.
Please provide the duration till then you preserve your documents in order to provide information seekers under R.T.I. Act 2005.
Please provide the process how you provide video clip of transaction free of cost in the case of failure of transaction and consumer suffered loss.
Concerned CPIO
Nodal Officer
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)

From <https://rtionline.gov.in/request/regdetails.php?regId=kZwHw2dgIwkEgDudx2hnX5guR4ZEGjkcZqXUNUa1oDs%3D>

Online RTI Appeal Form Details 
RTI Appeal Details :-
RTI Appeal Registration number
VIJBK/A/2017/60045
Public Authority
Vijaya Bank
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number
VIJBK/R/2017/50211
Request Registration Date
28/08/2017
Name
Shakuntala Devi
Gender
Female
Address
Shivala Mahanth Hathiya fatak , Post Putalighar, District Mirzapur
Pincode
231001
Country
India
State
Uttar Pradesh
Status
Urban
Educational Status
Illiterate
Phone Number
Details not provided
Mobile Number
+91-8738895762
Email-ID
yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship
Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ?
No
Ground For Appeal
No Response Within the Time Limit
CPIO of Public Authority approached
Details not provided
CPIO’s Order/Decision Number
Details not provided
CPIO’s Order/Decision Date
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
Prayer or Relief Sought
CPIO violated subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005 and still, there is no signal that he will provide the sought information.
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)
Supporting document not provided

From <https://rtionline.gov.in/request/regdetails.php?regId=RD375xH6lyIxsKj1L1I7mYribcjbKvLl5CFB9OvMCiQ%3D

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

Hon'ble Sir that dealing of the branch manager of the bank concerned is quite cryptic ipso facto obvious from his dealings. Hon’ble Sir, we are poor and Rs.2000.00 is too much value to our family so there is need to take swift action in the matter concerned so your aggrieved applicant may get a reprieve. How can it be justified that without paying the said amount to your applicant and by taking the recourse of failed transaction concerned banks may deduct the impugned amount?

Preeti Singh
2 years ago

Hon'ble Sir that R.B.I. had directed to all the concerned banks in this country to protect the footage of C.C. T.V. consequently C.C. T.V. footage of aforesaid specific date can easily reveal the fact that whether the Son of your applicant drew the money or transaction remained failed.
3-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that dealing of the branch manager of the bank concerned is quite cryptic ipso facto obvious from his dealings. Hon’ble Sir, we are poor and Rs.2000.00 is too much value to our family so there is need to take swift action in the matter concerned so your aggrieved applicant may get a reprieve. How can it be justified that without paying the said amount to your applicant and by taking the recourse of failed transaction concerned banks may deduct the impugned amount?