Information sought from D.G.P. regarding action on communication of president secretariat

Registration Number DGPOF/R/2020/60215
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 07-06-2020
RTI Fee Received    10
Online Reference Number IK0AODFKG2
Transaction Status Success
Request filed with Director General of Police Office
 Contact Details of Nodal Officer  
Telephone Number 9454401951
Email-ID rti.dgphq-up@gov.in
Registration Number DGPOF/R/2020/60215
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 07/06/2020
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 07/06/2020
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454401951
Email-ID rti.dgphq-up@gov.in

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Director General of Police Office
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number DGPOF/R/2020/60215
Date of Filing 07/06/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought The matter is concerned with the president secretariat reference number-P2-A/0908190127/2019 dated-09/08/2019 which was forwarded by Sunil Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Secretary, Chief Minister Office, Government of Uttar Pradesh through a communication dated-13/12/2019 addressed to D.G.P. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh attached as the first page to document. Please provide the information as sought,

1-Notings and minutes of proceedings.

2-Cause of delay in providing action taken report.

3-Name and designation of the staffs processing the matter.

4-If more time will be taken, then provide duration.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 1 October 2019 at 01:56
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement

.

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the following submissions.

Most respected Superintendent of police, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number-135 H/C Year 2006 as follows-

It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the stair case so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at  her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that  the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take appropriate remedy. Dated-07/03/2006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justices of Division bench of Lucknow. It would be better to take perusal by Sir itself.

Respondent-1-State of U.P. through Secretary of home.

2-S.S.P. Lucknow 3-S.H.O. Ashiyana Police station.

Whether competent court means police as defined by the aforementioned respondents?

To open the lock of the door and open the door for seeking appropriate remedy means to open the door for always and hatching a conspiracy against the applicant and his family.

Consequently, a fabricated First Information Report by colluding with the police was lodged in the police station Ashiyana on 11 July 2009 after 3 years 4 months 4 days of Judgement Dated-07/03/2006 -under sections of I.P.C. as case number-269/2009 Indian Penal Code- sections 448,406,420,467,468,471,394 of India Penal Code.

All these documents were submitted by the police before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the court took the cognizance and passed the order in accordance with the law but later on police found the records forged and aforementioned fabricated charges not only framed on the applicant but on his wife and daughter as well. Thus terrorised entire family so they fled by putting locks in the rooms latter locks were broken and the entire house was grabbed even valuables were looted. Which means Lucknow police had submitted forged records before the High court along with the affidavit.

Thus a competent and appropriate court delivered the Judgement in the matter in compliance of the High court order Dated-07/03/2006.

How the faith of common man will be ensured in the government machinery if such anarchy will prevail in the system?

Sunday, June 7, 2020

3:26 PM

Subject

Re: How the faith of common man will be ensured in the government machinery if such anarchy will prevail in the system?

From

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

To

pmosb; supremecourt; presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; urgent-action; cmup; hgovup@up.nic.in; csup@up.nic.in; uphrclko; lokayukta@hotmail.com

Sent

Friday, August 2, 2019 2:36 PM

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement

.

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the report of the Circle officer Cant as follows.

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that ipso facto obvious as earlier Lucknow police colluded with the land Mafia in grabbing the land and houses of the aggrieved applicant Dinesh Pratap Singh and now acting like a biased judge who is dictating his judgement in the matter. First important thing is that Lucknow police which is acting like tyrant and termed purchased house and land of the applicant as belongings of the land grabbers despite the all requisite documents required in support of the claim of the applicant were made available to the Lucknow police.

4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that aforementioned report was submitted by the circle officer cant in order to redress to following complaint cum application against Lucknow police

आवेदन का विवरण

शिकायत संख्या

40015719037726

आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:

Dinesh Pratap Singh

आवेदक कर्ता का मोबाइल न०:

9838919619,9838919619

विषय:

प्रकरण शिकायत संख्या 40015719035344 आवेदक कर्ता का नाम: Dinesh Pratap Singh आवेदक कर्ता का मोबाइल न०: 9838919619, के गैर जिम्मेदारानापूर्ण निस्तारण से सम्बंधित है | माननीय वरिष्ठ पुलिस अधीक्षक महोदय जिस प्रकार उपनिरीक्षक मनोज कुमार ने आख्या प्रस्तुत की है उससे यह स्पष्ट है की उन्होंने ने प्रकरण को समझा ही नहीं | और प्रकरण की विषय वस्तु ही नहीं समझ में रही है वह उपनिरीक्षक जांच क्या करेगा | श्री मान जी जिस मकान और जमीन को ये महोदय मृतका की पत्नी का बता रहे है उसका विक्रय प्रार्थी को किया जा चूका है जिसके आधार पर प्रार्थी सन १९९८ से २००९ तक रहा है और इनके अत्याचारों से पीड़ित हो कर तथा पुलिस के पक्षपातपूर्ण रवैया के वजह से हमे ताला लगा कर हटना पड़ा | किन्तु इनके रिपोर्ट से स्पष्ट है हमारी गृहस्थी का सम्पूर्ण सामान आभूषण इत्यादि जो भी उस समय छोड़ा गया था वह सभी टाला तोड़ कर लूट लिया गया और जमीन मकान सभी पर कब्ज़ा कर लिया गया | प्रार्थी द्वारा समस्त कागजात प्रस्तुत किये गए है किन्तु उपनिरीक्षक महोदय को कुछ समझ में ही नहीं आता है | प्रकरण की जांच उस पुलिस अधिकारी से कराया जाय जिसकी आंग्ल भाषा पे अच्छी पकड़ हो |

नियत तिथि:

31 – Jul – 2019

शिकायत की स्थिति:

निस्तारित

रिमाइंडर :

फीडबैक :

फीडबैक की स्थिति:

आवेदन का संलग्नक

संलग्नक देखें

अग्रसारित विवरण

क्र..

सन्दर्भ का प्रकार

आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी

आदेश दिनांक

अधिकारी को प्रेषित

आदेश

आख्या दिनांक

आख्या

स्थिति

1

अंतरित

ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ

01 – Jul – 2019

क्षेत्राधिकारीक्षेत्राधिकारी कैंट

31/07/2019

प्रस्तुत प्रकरण की जांच की गयी |जांच आख्या संलग्न है |

निस्तारित

Pasted from <http://www.jansunwai.up.nic.in/TrackGraviancePopup.aspx?complainno=40015719037726&Emaild=arunpratapsingh904@gmail.com&IsOldNew=N&Type=2>

 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that undoubtedly matter is not only 15 years old but it is 20 years old as the agreement and power of attorney of the land and house was given to the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh in 1998 and power attorney was made available through the office of Registrar and Deputy registrar is itself approved. Moreover in the disputed Land and house applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh was living since 1998 to 2010 thereafter because of conspiracy of the grabber with the police and planned quarrels pressurised the family of the applicant lock the rooms and left place for peace and took rooms on rent but without justice against the atrocity of the police. Now time has come to trace the truth. Entire records are attached to grievance so please take the perusal.

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 15:27, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

An application under article 32 of the constitution of India to get a reprieve for a retired correspondent who was deprived of his dwelling place arbitrarily and land Mafia carrying out commercial activities in that house and posed a great danger to Right to Life with dignity.

On behalf of aggrieved individual Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd. Singh Mobile number9838919619 -Address-LD/84B Sleeper Ground, Railway Colony, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh but presently new address-C/O K. P. Singh Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh.

To

                           The Hon’ble chief justice of India /companion judges

                                 Supreme court of India, New Delhi, India

Petitioner-Yogi M. P. Singh. 

Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road

District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Pincode-231001

                                        Versus

Respondent-1-Principal Secretary, Home,

Department of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.

2-Director General of police,

The government of Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.

3-Superintendent of police,

District-Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh

Prayer-Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd. Singh Mobile number9838919619 seeks justice from the court as appropriate direction be issued to the aforementioned respondents to be instrumental in vacating the house and lodge F.I.R. against Land Mafias cum grabbers who are carrying out commercial activities in the house of the applicant or take action against the Land Maffia cum cheater Babu Singh S/O R. P. Singh Address-1914-18 Kanpur Road scheme, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh who breached the terms of the agreement made on 12-Jun-1998.

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement

.

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the agreement made on 12-Jun-1998 between the aggrieved person Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd. Singh Mobile number9838919619 and Babu Singh S/O R. P. Singh as follows.

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that on 11-July-1998 a receipt was made available by the Babu Singh S/O R. P. Singh which explicitly proves that total Rs.300000.00 was paid to the seller Babu Singh S/O R. P. Singh and rest amount was promised to be paid before the sub-registrar Lucknow at the time of execution of the registration of the sale deed. Ipso facto obvious from the following JPG image of the receipt.

4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of electricity bill made available to the aggrieved individual Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd. Singh

5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Sir it is obligatory duty of the police and judiciary to safeguard the property and life of the citizens of this country but I have lost entire money earned throughout the life. Now I, aggrieved individual is living at the house of his daughter and wife expired because of the trauma of this tragic incidence. Where is the justice in this largest democracy in the world? Sir Police has compromised with the land mafias and I was thrown away by the Mafias and no one is paying heed to the representation of the aggrieved individual such is the scenario of this largest democracy in the world.

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely

Date-31-03-2019              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arun Pratap Singh
5 months ago

Here rules are broken frequently because no accountability is fixed of the wrongdoers. Here corruption is so rampant in the government offices that no one pursues truth but touch only those files in which palms are greased. No files move in the government offices without taking by the government staffs. Here three organs of the government acts in caucus with each other and do not interfere in the corrupt working styles of each other. Here independence of judiciary means if public seeks remedy against the misdeeds of judicial members, then he will not be granted any reprieve in the name of independence of judiciary. There is tacit understanding between the wrongdoers .

Preeti Singh
5 months ago

Why not this order of the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad was complied by the police when the home secretary, government of Uttar Pradesh was the respondent number 1 ? It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the stair case so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take appropriate remedy. Dated-07/03/2006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justices of Division bench of Lucknow. It would be better to take perusal by Sir itself.

Beerbhadra Singh
Beerbhadra Singh
5 months ago

Undoubtedly matter is concerned with the deep rooted corruption and this corruption is concerned with the police department of state of Uttar Pradesh and most surprising, it is concerned with the police of the state capital so it is obligation of the Director General of Police to made available the information to the information seeker at the earliest if there is still remained some ethical values on moral values in the police personnel. Concerned matter is not only concerned with the contempt of court of the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad but also mockery of the law of land.

Bhoomika Singh
5 months ago

Undoubtedly matter is concerned with the deep rooted corruption of the police department as the police is overlooking the direction passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad quite obvious from the attached documents with this post. Here most unfortunate thing is that if the Lucknow bench is saying that Anuradha Singh may seek civil remedy from appropriate Court then how Aashiyana police can provide the criminal remedy in the matter as high court directed Anuradha Singh to seek civil remedy to appropriate Court undoubtedly it is mockery of the law of land and concerned police staff committed The Contempt of court but who will bell the cat?