Information sought from chief minister office regarding irregularity of commissioner housing and development council

 

Registration Number DOCMO/R/2020/60548
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 17/10/2020
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 17/10/2020
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454411436
Email-ID lscm700@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Chief Minister office
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number DOCMO/R/2020/60548
Date of Filing 17/10/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Post office Sangmohal
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details:-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line? No
((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought Grievance Status for registration number: PMOPG/E/2020/0899333 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt 08/10/2020 Received By Ministry/Department Prime Ministers Office Current Status Under process Date of Action 09/10/2020 Remarks Grievance received by Subordinate Organisation from Web API Officer Concerns To Officer Name Shri Arun Kumar Dube Officer Designation Joint Secretary Contact Address Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow Grievance Status for registration number: PMOPG/E/2020/0899333 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant- Yogi M P Singh

1-Provide time taken by the chief minister office to redress the grievances forwarded by prime minister office.

2-Provide the name and designation of the officer under whose monitoring aforementioned grievance is being processed.

3-Provide the information sought in the grievance aforementioned under R.T.I. Act of 2005.

4-Time prescribed in the citizen charter of this state to process a grievance may be provided by SPIO if he is pursuing it.

5-Provide the current status of the grievance available in the chief minister office. 6-If forwarded to other public authority under subsection 3 of section 6, then the detail of public authority with the status of grievance.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

Grievance Status for registration number: PMOPG/E/2020/0899333

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
08/10/2020
Received By Ministry/Department
Prime Ministers Office
Grievance Description
Matter is concerned with the serious irregularities in Lucknow Development Authorities requires a thorough enquiry. Government of Uttar Pradesh is adopting lackadaisical approach to deal with the matter.
आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण : शिकायत संख्या:-40015719059911आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singh अंतरितऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ11-09-2019 को मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय द्वारा अधीक्षण अभियंतामण्डल -लखनऊ,उ.प्र. आवास एवं विकास परिषद को प्रेषित और जिसका नियत तिथि 26-09-2019 थी श्रेणीकरण पूर्व निक्षेपित अधीक्षण अभियंता उ.प्र. आवास एवं विकास परिषद दिनांक 17-09-2019 को उपाध्यक्ष-लखनऊ,विकास प्राधिकरण को प्रेषित और जिसका नियत तिथि 26-09-2019 थी कृपया प्रकरण में नियमानुसार कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें C-श्रेणीकरण मंडलायुक्त दिनांक 29-09-2020 को उपाध्यक्ष-लखनऊ,विकास प्राधिकरण को प्रेषित और जिसका नियत तिथि 31-08-2020 थी कृपयाकृपया प्रकरण का गंभीरता से पुनः परीक्षण कर नियमानुसार कार्यवाही करते हुए 07 दिवस में आख्या उपलब्ध कराए जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है आख्या प्रेषित, अनुमोदन लंबित
शिकायत संख्या:-40015720057734 आवेदक का नाम- दिनेश प्रताप सिंह According to report of नगर आयुक्त
प्रकरण का सम्बन्ध लखनऊ नगर निगम से नहीं है, कृपया सम्बन्धित विभाग को अग्रसारित करने का कष्ट करें।
शिकायत संख्या:- 40015720057601 आवेदक का नाम-दिनेश प्रताप सिंह
According to report of आयुक्त -उ.प्र. आवास एवं विकास परिषद यह शिकायत उ.प्र.आवास एवं विकास परिषद् से सम्बंधित नहीं है यह शिकायत लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण , जिला लखनऊ से सम्बंधित है कृपया सम्बन्धित विभाग को शिकायत प्रेषित करने का कष्ट करें
शिकायत संख्या:-40015720054268 आवेदक का नाम-Dinesh Pratap Singh
According to report of आयुक्त -उ.प्र. आवास एवं विकास परिषद प्रकरण आवास विकास परिषद् से सम्बंधित नहीं है
शिकायत संख्या:-40015719059911आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singh शिकायत संख्या:-40015720057734 आवेदक का नाम- दिनेश प्रताप सिंह शिकायत संख्या:- 40015720057601 आवेदक का नाम-दिनेश प्रताप सिंह शिकायत संख्या:-40015720054268 आवेदक का नाम-Dinesh Pratap Singh

Public information officer may provide the following information pointwise as sought.
1-In the representation of Yogi M. P. Singh, commissioner housing and development council forwarded the matter to L.D.A. but in the repeated representations of Dinesh Pratap Singh, he constantly denied by taking the recourse of L.D.A.
Provide the reason for biased treatment.
2-Neither Commissioner Housing and development council nor Nagar commissioner forwarded the matter to L.D.A. on the Jansunwai Portal of Uttar Pradesh. Provide information regarding the mechanism of redress of grievances concerned with irregularities in public authority L.D.A.
3-Provide the detail of staff who processed शिकायत संख्या:- 40015720057601and शिकायत संख्या:-40015720054268 as well as the detail of the staff who monitored the processing.

Grievance Document
Current Status
Under process
Date of Action
09/10/2020
Remarks
Grievance received by Subordinate Organisation from Web API
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Arun Kumar Dube
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
sushil7769@gmail.com
Contact Number
0522 2226349

5 comments on Information sought from chief minister office regarding irregularity of commissioner housing and development council

  1. In the representation of Yogi M. P. Singh, commissioner housing and development council forwarded the matter to L.D.A. but in the repeated representations of Dinesh Pratap Singh, he constantly denied by taking the recourse of L.D.A.
    If the Lucknow development authority does not come under the ambit of the commissioner housing and development council, how/ commissioner housing and development council can deny justice to Dinesh Pratap Singh and more surprising forwarded the letter of Yogi M. P. Singh to the L.D.A.?

  2. During the Congress resume Right to information act 2005 what brought up to empower the citizens of this largest democracy in the world but it is unfortunate that the government at the centre and the Yogi government in the state of uttar Pradesh are making conspiracy to dilute its provisions quite obvious from their cryptic working styles.

  3. Since concerned are running away from entertaining the grievance of the aggrieved applicant so it is not confirmed that whether they will provide information under right to information act 2005 or not? Everyone knows that most of the application under right to information act 2005 remain untouched because of the reluctant approach of the concerned public functionaries to provide information.From the order passed by the high court of judicature at Allahabad Lucknow bench, it is quite obvious that first of all title dispute may be resolved thereafter possession may be provided to the title holder of the land but it is unfortunate that because of corruption Anuradha Singh did not take shelter of any competent court but it hatched a conspiracy by taking the corrupt public functionaries under good faith.

  4. Following information sought from public authority chief minister office so its SPIO may provide following information as soon as possible.
    1-Provide time taken by the chief minister office to redress the grievances forwarded by prime minister office.

    2-Provide the name and designation of the officer under whose monitoring aforementioned grievance is being processed.

    3-Provide the information sought in the grievance aforementioned under R.T.I. Act of 2005.

    4-Time prescribed in the citizen charter of this state to process a grievance may be provided by SPIO if he is pursuing it.

    5-Provide the current status of the grievance available in the chief minister office. 6-If forwarded to other public authority under subsection 3 of section 6, then the detail of public authority with the status of grievance.

  5. योगी एम। पी। सिंह के प्रत्यावेदन में, आयुक्त आवास और विकास परिषद ने इस मामले को एल.डी.ए. को अग्रसारित किया है लेकिन दिनेश प्रताप सिंह के बार-बार प्रस्तुत प्रत्यावेदनों को उन्होंने L.D.A का सहारा लेते हुए लगातार इनकार किया की मामला एल डी ए से सम्बंधित और शिकायत को निस्तारित करा दिए ।
    यदि लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण आयुक्त आवास और विकास परिषद के दायरे में नहीं आता है, तो दिनेश प्रताप सिंह को न्याय / आवास और विकास परिषद कैसे इंकार कर सकते हैं और अधिक आश्चर्यजनक रूप से योगी एम। पी। सिंह के पत्र को L.D.A. को अग्रसारित किया गया आयुक्त आवास एवं विकास परिषद् द्वारा

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: