Information seeker sought information from public information officer, secretary home, Uttar Pradesh

 

Booked At
Booked On
Destination Pincode
Tariff
Article Type
Delivery Location
Delivery Confirmed On
Mirzapur
RMS POS Counter
06/10/2019
19:34:22
226004
47.20
Speed
Post
Rajendranagar
SO Lucknow
10/10/2019
17:56:38
Event Details For : EU787012644IN
Current Status : Item Delivery Confirmed
Date
Time
Office
Event
10/10/2019
17:56:38
Lucknow
GPO
Item
Delivery Confirmed
10/10/2019
12:17:41
Lucknow
GPO
Out
for Delivery
09/10/2019
09:26:43
Lucknow
GPO
Item
Received
08/10/2019
03:54:06
Lucknow
NSH
Item
Dispatched
08/10/2019
00:53:01
Lucknow
NSH
Item
Bagged
07/10/2019
23:32:58
Lucknow
NSH
Item
Received
07/10/2019
05:51:53
MA
Mirzapur TMO
Item
Dispatched
07/10/2019
05:44:19
MA
Mirzapur TMO
Received
at TMO
07/10/2019
01:03:57
Mirzapur
ICH
Item
Dispatched
07/10/2019
00:56:13
Mirzapur
ICH
Item
Bagged
06/10/2019
20:28:06
Mirzapur
ICH
Item
Received
06/10/2019
20:13:53
Mirzapur
RMS POS Counter
Item
Dispatched
06/10/2019
20:12:54
Mirzapur
RMS POS Counter
Item
Bagged
06/10/2019
19:34:22
Mirzapur
RMS POS Counter
Item
Booked

 

Yogi M.
P. Singh is the authorized representative of the applicant to pursue the matter
before the competent authorities.

 

The matter is urgent so pay due care to the R.T.I. Communique. 

An application under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act
2005 seeking information from
public information officer of the following public
authority.                
 

To                                     

                                          Public information officer

 

          Name and designation-Jh fo|kdqekj or whoever may be]

 

                               vuqHkkx vf/kdkjh

 

              Department-  x`g foHkkx tulwpuk vf/kdkjh Mobile No-9454413858        District-Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh PIN
Code-
226004

 

Subject-You
are invited to provide the following pointwise information within time as
stipulated under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005.

 

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention
of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

 

Hon’ble
Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the संदर्भ संख्या: 40015719066963, दिनांक
– 06 Oct 2019 तक की स्थिति  आवेदनकर्ता का
विवरण : शिकायत संख्या:- 40015719066963 आवेदक का नाम- Dinesh Pratap Singh and

 

जनसुनवाई
समन्वित शिकायत निवारण प्रणाली, उत्तर प्रदेश

 

सन्दर्भ संख्या:-  40015719067227

 

सस्तुतीकर्ता
की जानकारी

 

नाम
संस्तुतिकर्ता
की जानकारी
मोबइल नंबर(१)
मोबइल नंबर(२)
राज्य
ई-मेल

 

लाभार्थी का विवरण

 

नाम
Dinesh Pratap Singh
पिता/पति का नाम
Angad Prasad Singh
मोबइल नंबर(१)
9838919619

 

Aforementioned
grievances cum complaints were submitted by the applicant on the august portal
Jansunwai of Government of Uttar Pradesh.

 

 

The
First, second and third, fourth, fifth page of the annexure is the grievances
as aforementioned and order passed
by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at
Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006.

 

 

CPIO may be directed to provide the following information
pointwise as sought.

 

Most respected Superintendent
of police, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh
Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order
passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the
Writ Petition Number135 HC Year 2006 as follows It is simply ordered that the
respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt
Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and
appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the
liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal
detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce
the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since she
can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court,
therefore it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh
shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open
the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out
and take appropriate remedy. Dated07032006 Signed by the concerned Honourable
Justices of Division bench of Lucknow.

 

1-Please provide the
G.O./Circular/Legislation which empowers the Lucknow police as the competent
court having the power to grant the civil remedies or if any constitutional
functionary delegated any such power as aforementioned must be revealed to
information seeker in detail.

 

2-Please, provide access to information regarding the reasoned
decision taken by the S.S.P. Lucknow in the grievances aforementioned and which
detail is available as page 1 and page 2 of the annexure. Right to reason is an
indispensable part of the sound administrative system.

 

Applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the respondent
number First who is Secretary of home department, civil secretariat, Government
of Uttar Pradesh and respondent number second who is senior superintendent of
police Lucknow as well as the station house officer police station Ashiyana who
is the respondent number 3 in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed
in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by
Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother
Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh.
Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get
public aid by changing the name is not illegal? This lady took the land of LDA
by bearing the name of Guddi daughter of Brijraj Singh and in order to seek
remedy from High court of Judicature at Allahabad, she took the new name
Anuradha Singh and now she has been Aradhna Singh whether it is not a mockery
of the law of land? Sir, please take a glance of the affidavit submitted by the
sub-inspector Satyesh Prakash Dwivedi in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year
2006. This affidavit is on behalf of the respondent number-1, 2 and 3 so it is
the responsibility of concerned to maintain the sanctity of the affidavit. Sir
order of the High court of judicature was for respondent number 1.2 and 3. Sir
how can it be justified that Aradhna changed name of Guddi and Anuradha could
manage the support of respondent number 1, 2 and 3 to get illegal possession of
the land and house of the applicant by robbing the household articles of the
applicant and fabricating the false charges not only on the applicant but also
on his wife and daughter? Whether this step of the aforementioned respondents
had not undermined the authority of High court of judicature and against the
spirit of the affidavit submitted by them through the aforementioned
sub-inspector as the spirit of the affidavit was crushed by them? Whether High
court of judicature had ordered to slap false and fabricated charges on the
applicant and his wife and daughter as a conspiracy to provide illegal
possession to Anuradha Singh now Aradhana Singh and loot the valuables of the
applicant by breaking the Locks of rooms? Whether it was the motive of the High
court in passing the order that police may play the role of a competent court
and competent administrative body as ordered in the writ of multi named
personality Anuradha Singh to seek a civil remedy before the competent court?
Whether the civil remedy is provided by the police in this largest democracy in
the world and the police is the competent court?

 

 

3-Please provide the detail of the privileges granted to
Lucknow police specially Ashiyana police station which not only overlooked the
direction of the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad but
also persecuted not only the applicant but also slapped serious charges on the
wife and daughter of the information seeker.

 

4-Please, provide access to information which caused the
police to submit forged documents before the Lucknow bench of the High court of
Judicature at Allahabad on behalf of respondent number -1,2 and 3 as later all
those documents were declare forged when police acted to provide civil remedy
as competent court in order to comply the order passed by High court.

 

5-Please provide the
detail of name and designation of the staffs of the Lucknow police who remained
instrumental in declaring the impugned land and house of the applicant as the
property of Aradhana Singh and robbing the household valuables by breaking the
locks of rooms when family fled from the terror of police, third name of the
multi named Lady.

 

     Please provide the aforementioned sought
information pointwise as sought by the information seeker. For this applicant
shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

 

 

 

 

Date-06/10/2019                                          

 

    

 


 Yours sincerely

 

 

                                          

 

                                      Dinesh
Pratap Singh S/O Mr Angad Prasad Singh

 

C/O Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram,
Jabalpur Road, Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir District-Mirzapur, Uttar
Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

 

 

Note-Indian postal orders of Rs.20 as R.T.I.
Fee i.e. Rs.10 bearing serial number-51F 033036and second Indian postal order
of Rs.10 bearing serial number-51F 033037.

 

3 comments on Information seeker sought information from public information officer, secretary home, Uttar Pradesh

  1. The order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number135 HC Year 2006 as follows It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere.

  2. Undoubtedly Lucknow police must tell the people that who have delegated it to the power of Civil Court and it decided the cases which was amenable before the Civil Court and it may also tell under which notification government of Uttar Pradesh or Government of India provided it the power of Civil Court is quite obvious that after the judgement delivered by the high court of judicature Lucknow bench of the High Court of Allahabad it registered various cases against the aggrieved applicant and his wife and daughter in order to grab the house and land through such wrong practice so that family members maybe terrorized and they themselves may escape from the the house and finally they succeeded and in that order they looted the belongings of the house and grab the room by breaking the lock of the room which was quite unconstitutional and mockery of the provisions of the law of land which was performed by taking the police under good faith.

  3. Home secretary is the respondent number-1.and mute spectators of the mockery of the law of land.
    प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-प्राप्त फीडबैक –
    दिनांक05-11-2019 को फीडबैक:-श्री मान जी कुंडी खोल कर दरवाजा खोलने का आदेश लखनऊ पीठ माननीय उच्च न्यायालय इलाहाबाद ने इसलिए दिया की अनुराधा सिंह उर्फ आराधना सिंह उर्फ गुड्डी सक्षम न्यायालय के समक्ष वाद प्रस्तुत कर सिविल उपचार हासिल करे | उपरोक्त ने क्या उपचार हासिल किया है | श्री मान जी किस अधिसूचना के माध्यम से लखनऊ पुलिस को सिविल कोर्ट को दर्जा प्राप्त है या किसी सक्षम अधिकरण या न्यायालय ने लखनऊ पुलिस को अपना अधिकार डेलिगेट कर दिया है जिससे की लखनऊ पुलिस ने उपरोक्त महिला को जमीन और मकान का मालिकाना हक प्रदान कर दिया और न सिर्फ प्रार्थी बल्कि औरत बेटी के खिलाफ संगीन धाराओं में मुक़दमा कर दिया और उनके हटते ही मकान का ताला तोड़ कर मकान पर कब्ज़ा कर लिया गया समस्त गृहस्थी और दुसरे कीमती सामानों को लूट लिया गया इस तरह से लखनऊ पुलिस माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के आदेशो का अक्षरशः पालन किया है | श्री मान जी दश भिन्न भिन्न शिकायतों में एक ही रिपोर्ट लगा कर लखनऊ पुलिस अपने दायित्वों से इति श्री कर लेती है या तो पुलिस विभाग को शिकायतों का निवेदन समझ में नही आता या जान बूझ कर समझने का प्रयास नही करते | मामले में सम्बंधित पुलिस कर्मियों के विरुद्ध नियमानुसार कार्यवाही होनी चाहिए और उच्च न्यायालय आदेश की यथा स्थिति बहाल होनी चाहिए | पुलिस का रिपोर्ट सिर्फ भ्रामक है किसी भी तरह से स्वीकार किया जाता तो उच्च न्यायालय के द्वारा पारित आदेश का उल्लंघन होगा |

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: