In two financial years only two PIOs were penalized by UPSIC but not a single penny was recovered

 

 

In two financial years only two PIOs were penalized by UPSIC but not a single penny was recovered from their salary. Whether this is not anarchy.


Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Attachments8:24 PM (4 minutes ago)

to sec.sic, supremecourt, pmosb, hgovup, cmup, urgent-action, csup
 With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may take a glance of attachment in the PDF form containing 18 pages with this e-mail representation, categorically showing that our state is governed by lawlessness and sheer anarchy. Whether  this is not corruption that erring PIOs who are floating all set up standard norms and violating the provisions of Right to Information are not being subjected to penal action because of tacit understanding between them and accountable public functionaries in the state.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may take a glance of following e-mail representation submitted before various public authorities but no accountable public functionary desires to curb this jungle raj. It seems that all have put their hands in the globe of corruption.
At least penalty must also be recovered from B.D.O. but commissioner rural development overlooked
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Mar 15
to urgent-action, pmosb, supremecourt, hgovup, cmup, csup, secypg, ddpg2-arpg, sec.sic
Hon’ble Sir-Whether any action will be taken to direct concerned to recover penalty from B.D.O. Bhola Nath Kannaujia as requested by your applicant under point 2-2- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.M. Mirzapur requested to commissioner ,Rural development ,Uttar Pradesh , Lucknow through letter 947 dated 13.01.2014 that imposed penalty may be deducted from the salary of aforesaid B.D.O. and may be deposited to treasury and be apprised to section officer PMO, under secretary CMO and personal secretary to chief secretary. Hon’ble Sir This is reminder e-mail. I have sent you so many reminders then D.M. Mirzapur told me that in two financial years only two PIOs are punished but their penalties have to recovered from their salary. The progress is before you Hon’ble Sir. At least letters should be sent if penalty couldn’t be recovered so that they may not make travesty of justice/provisions of Transparency act. Your applicant expects that at least his representation may be endorsed to concern with stern advice note. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir. 
Director of basic education Uttar Pradesh Lucknow directed PIO /District B.S.A. Mirzapur to made available information.
The content of the letter is as follows.
Sender-Director, Basic education ,Uttar Pradesh , Lucknow
To
              Public Information Officer /District Basic Shiksha Adhikari (B.S.A.) ,Mirzapur
Letter No. Educationa Directorate /Basic /R.T.I./2013/14  Dated-4.2.2014
Subject-In regard to made available information under Right to Information Act 2005 .
Gentle man,
                        Aforesaid subject is addressed to Director ,Basic Education ,Uttar Pradesh ,Lucknow as well as endorsed to others of letter of public information officer /additional district magistrate  F/R collectorate Mirzapur dated 13.1.2014 , take the perusal of this letter . This letter has been received from personal secretary /public information officer ,Chief secretary ,Government of Uttar Pradesh in order to dispose it.
In respect of this letter ,I was directed that please take necessary steps in the concerned matter and made available the sought information to complainant within time under Right to Information Act 2005 and ensure to  apprise the concerned.
Annexure as aforesaid              With regard
                                 Mahendra Pratap Singh
Assistant public information officer
 For director ,basic education ,Uttar Pradesh ,Lucknow
   Endorsed to. Letter No. E.D. B./General education ,R.T.I./27612-16 /2013-14 same date
1-copy to PIO /Additional Director basic education. Uttar Pradesh ,Allahabad
2-copy to PIO/Divisional assistant director basic education Varanasi .
3-copy to concerned assistant, camp office Right to Information ,Lucknow
4-copy to Yogi M. P. Singh Resident-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road , Mirzapur.
                                     Initial of APIO 3.2.14  
                              Mahendra Pratap Singh
Assistant public information officer
 For director ,basic education ,Uttar Pradesh ,Lucknow 
In two financial years ,only three imposed penalties on two erring PIOs but unfortunately still to be recovered.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
8:08 PM (3 minutes ago)
to pmosb, hgovup, urgent-action, cmup, supremecourt, cj, csup, secypg, ddpg2-arpg, sec.sic, lokayukta, uphrclko
Hon’ble Sir. With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under section 4 (1)(d)
Every public authority shall—
provide reasons for its administrative or quasi-judicial decisions to affected persons.
Hon’ble Sir B.D.O. Chhanbey Bhola Nath Kannaujia and B.S.A. Mirzapur Dinesh Kumar Yadav didn’t deposit the imposed penalty as imposed under section 20 of Right to Information Act 2005 by U.P.S.I.C. . Whether wrongdoer B.D.O. will deposit Rs. 25 thousand rupees with interest and B.S.A. will deposit Rs. 50 thousand with interest as required by law to the treasury. Hon’ble Sir please take a glance of attached PDF.
2- It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.M. Mirzapur requested to commissioner ,Rural development ,Uttar Pradesh , Lucknow through letter 947 dated 13.01.2014 that imposed penalty may be deducted from the salary of aforesaid B.D.O. and may be deposited to treasury and be apprised to section officer PMO, under secretary CMO and personal secretary to chief secretary. Likewise D.M. Mirzapur  requested to Director , Basic Education , Uttar Pradesh , Lucknow through letter 948 dated 13.01.2014 that imposed penalty may be deducted from the salary of aforesaid B.S.A. and may be deposited to treasury and be apprised to section officer PMO, under secretary CMO and personal secretary to chief secretary . Please take a glance of attached PDF. Whether complainant will not be made available sought information. In two financial years ,only three penalties have been made by UPSIC and not a coin was recovered by government functionaries still and now indirectly D.M. Mirzapur is overlooking the complainant to whom he has to furnish access to information.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 (3)
Where an application is made to a public authority requesting for an information,—
(i)
   which is held by another public             authority; or
(ii)
the subject matter of which is more closely connected with the functions of another public authority,
the public authority, to which such application is made, shall transfer the application or such part of it as may be appropriate to that other public authority and inform the applicant immediately about such transfer:
Provided that the transfer of an application pursuant to this sub-section shall be made as soon as practicable but in no case later than five days from the date of receipt of the application.
Whether D.M. Mirzapur don’t want to make available information to your applicant if yes then why? Here it is obvious that sought information is held by Commissioner ,rural development and Director ,basic education so concerned may be directed by the competent authority in order to make available the information as sought by information seeker. Please take a glance of following link-http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.com/2013/12/it-is-unfortunate-that-no-pio-is_22.html
  This is humble request of your applicant to direct concerned authority to make available sought information.  For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                              Yours sincerely
                           Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur (U.P.) India.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that there is concrete evidence but no wrongdoer is being punished whether such act of government itself not promoting wrongdoings/anarchy in the public institutions. Here this question arises that whether personnel appointed in the transparency panel deliberately avoiding the non-compliance of its orders or incompetent to get compliance of their orders. Whether such anarchy is not making our transparency panel teeth-less.
                                               This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that please take appropriate steps so that lawlessness being created because of non compliance of orders of UPSIC causing piling up of complaints in the office of ombudsman must be taken into account and such bad practice must be curbed. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                                                                                             Yours sincerely
                                                                                                            Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road , Dist-Mirzapur (U.P.),India  
04 December 2014

3 comments on In two financial years only two PIOs were penalized by UPSIC but not a single penny was recovered

  1. जब कोई शिकायतकर्ता सूचना न उपलब्ध होने पर इस बात से संतोष करता हैं की चलिए जिस जनसूचना अधिकारी की लापरवाही से उसे सूचना नहीं मिली उसे आयोग ने दण्डित तो किया किन्तु जब उसे यह मालुम होगा की आयोग ने उसे दण्डित नहीं किया बल्कि उसे अधेरे में रखा तो उसे कितना कष्ट होगा इसका अंदाजा सहज नहीं लगाया जा सकता हैं |यहा पर प्रश्न यह उठता हैं की उसे न्याय प्रदान किया गया या धोखा दिया गया |कितना गलत इस देश में हो रहा हैं और जिम्मेदार लोग अपने आख व कान दोनों बंद कर रखे हैं

  2. Really this is signal of anarchy that provisions of transparency act are being overlooked. There is no fear of penal action in the mind of erring PIOs because of lackadaisical approach of members of transparency panel towards redressing the grievances of information seekers. Either members are incompetent enough to get their orders complied or there is sheer corruption in the system and office of ombudsman is not untouched to it.

  3. पाच वर्ष से ज्यादा बीत गया एक सूचना आयुक्त के बाद दूसरा सूचना आयुक्त आ गए किन्तु शिकायत में सिर्फ इतना प्रोग्रेस हुआ की शिकायत की फाइल ही सूचना आयोगसे गायब हो गयी क्या यह की अराजकता से कम हैं अनेकों फाइल पञ्च वर्षों से ज्यादा लंबित हैं और सूचना प्राप्त करने के लिए शिकायत कर्ताअनेकों चक्कर लखनऊ का लगा रहा हैं अपने जेब से हजारों रुपये खर्च कर दिया किन्तु सूचना अभी तक नसीब हुई |

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: