In today’s India, only those public functionaries are preferred who may conceal corruption

Whether as deemed appropriate means concerned public functionary may not take any action in the matter as going on in

I got it online

Important mainly because you often read messages with this label.
Click to teach Gmail that this conversation is not important.

Inbox
Sudalai Kumar <ss.kumar1987@gmail.com>
27 Oct 2018, 20:31 (14 hours ago)
to Bala, me

Case Details of File Number: 2294/22/37/2018

Diary Number 176288/CR/2018
Name of the Complainant S KUMAR
Address 166/231 MAIN ROAD PATTARPURAM NANGUNERI TALUK TIRUNELVELI 627108

TIRUNELVELI , TAMIL NADU
Name of the Victim S KUMAR
Address 166/231 MAIN ROAD PATTARPURAM NANGUNERI TALUK TIRUNELVELI 627108

TIRUNELVELI , TAMIL NADU
Place of Incident TIRUNELVELI

TIRUNELVELI , TAMIL NADU
Date of Incident 9/25/2018
Direction issued by the Commission These complaints be transmitted to the concerned authority for such action as deemed appropriate. The authority concerned is directed to take appropriate action within 8 weeks and to inform the complainant of the action taken in the matter.
Action Taken Disposed with Directions (Dated 10/25/2018 )
Status on 10/27/2018 Disposed of.
On Oct 16, 2018 10:14 PM, “Sudalai Kumar” <ss.kumar1987@gmail.com> wrote:

Case Details of File Number: 456/22/2/2018

Diary Number 50035/CR/2018
Name of the Complainant SUDALAI KUMAR S
Address R/O DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINING GUINDY, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE CHENNAI

KANCHEEPURAM , TAMIL NADU
Name of the Victim SUDALAI KUMAR S
Address R/O DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINING GUINDY, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE CHENNAI

KANCHEEPURAM , TAMIL NADU
Place of Incident POLICHALUR KANCHIPURAM

KANCHEEPURAM , TAMIL NADU
Date of Incident 2/4/2018
Direction issued by the Commission These complaints be transmitted to the concerned authority for such action as deemed appropriate. The authority concerned is directed to take appropriate action within 8 weeks and to inform the complainant of the action taken in the matter.
Action Taken Disposed with Directions (Dated 4/11/2018 )
Status on 10/16/2018 Disposed of.
On Sep 26, 2018 5:23 PM, “Sudalai Kumar” <ss.kumar1987@gmail.com> wrote:

Case Details of File Number: 795/22/13/2018

Diary Number 53350/CR/2018
Name of the Complainant SUDALAI KUMAR S
Address R/O – PLOT NO. 40 FLAT NO. F8, VENKETESHWARA NAGAR 5TH STREET POSHICHALUR

CHENNAI , TAMIL NADU
Name of the Victim SUDALAI KUMAR S
Address R/O – PLOT NO. 40 FLAT NO. F8, VENKETESHWARA NAGAR 5TH STREET POSHICHALUR

CHENNAI , TAMIL NADU
Place of Incident CHENNAI

CHENNAI , TAMIL NADU
Date of Incident 2/4/2018
Direction issued by the Commission On perusal of the complaints listed above, it is seen that the allegations made in the complaint do not involve any public servant, hence not entertainable by the commission as per the Regulation 9 (vi) of the National Human Rights Commission (Procedure) Amendment Regulations, 1997 which reads as follows: “9. Complaints not ordinarily entertainable: The Commission may dismiss in limini complaints of the following nature: (vi) Allegation is not against any public servant;” Therefore, the complaints are filed and the cases are closed.
Action Taken Dismissed in Limini (Dated 5/15/2018 )
Status on 9/26/2018 Dismissed.

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 5:22 PM Sudalai Kumar <ss.kumar1987@gmail.com> wrote:
Case Details of File Number: 872/22/13/2018

Diary Number 57824/CR/2018
Name of the Complainant DR. SUDALAI KUMAR
Address GOVT. OF TAMILNADU CHENNAI

CHENNAI , TAMIL NADU
Name of the Victim DR. SUDALAI KUMAR
Address GOVT. OF TAMILNADU CHENNAI

CHENNAI , TAMIL NADU
Place of Incident POLICHALUR

CHENNAI , TAMIL NADU
Date of Incident Not Mentioned
Direction issued by the Commission These complaints be transmitted to the concerned authority for such action as deemed appropriate. The authority concerned is directed to take appropriate action within 8 weeks and to inform the complainant of the action taken in the matter.
Action Taken Disposed with Directions (Dated 5/28/2018 )
Status on 9/26/2018 Disposed of.

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 5:21 PM Sudalai Kumar <ss.kumar1987@gmail.com> wrote:
Case Details of File Number: 798/22/37/2018

Diary Number 49584/CR/2018
Name of the Complainant S. SUDALAI KUMAR, ASSTT PROF CHEMIST AND SOCIAL SCIENTIST
Address DEPT OF SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES FRANCS XAVIER INGINEERING COLLEGE SCAD GROUP OF INSTITUTES

TIRUNELVELI , TAMIL NADU
Name of the Victim S. SUDALAI KUMAR, ASSTT PROF CHEMIST AND SOCIAL SCIENTIST
Address DEPT OF SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES FRANCS XAVIER INGINEERING COLLEGE SCAD GROUP OF INSTITUTES

TIRUNELVELI , TAMIL NADU
Place of Incident TIRUNELVELI

TIRUNELVELI , TAMIL NADU
Date of Incident 2/4/2018
Direction issued by the Commission The grievance raised in the complaints, listed above, relate to the matters, which are subject of the State. Let the complaints be transferred to the concerned State Human Rights Commission u/s 13(6) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, for disposal in accordance with the provision of the Act.
Action Taken

Status on 9/26/2018

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 5:19 PM Sudalai Kumar <ss.kumar1987@gmail.com> wrote:
Case Details of File Number: 1483/22/13/2018

Diary Number 123436/CR/2018
Name of the Complainant S. SUDALAI KUMAR
Address TIRUNELVEL

TIRUNELVELI , TAMIL NADU
Name of the Victim S. SUDALAI KUMAR
Address TIRUNELVEL

TIRUNELVELI , TAMIL NADU
Place of Incident CHENNAI

CHENNAI , TAMIL NADU
Date of Incident 2/4/2018
Direction issued by the Commission On perusal of the complaints listed above, it is seen that the issue raised relates to civil dispute, such as property rights, contractual obligations and the like, hence not entertainable by the commission as per the Regulation 9(vii) of the National Human Rights Commission (Procedure) Amendment Regulations, 1997 which reads as follows: “9. Complaints not ordinarily entertainable: The Commission may dismiss in limine complaints of the following nature: (vii) The issue raised relates to civil dispute, such as property rights, contractual obligations and the like,” Therefore, the complaints are filed and the cases are closed
Action Taken Dismissed in Limine (Dated 8/1/2018 )
Status on 9/26/2018 Dismissed.

Best Regards,
Dr. S. Sudalai Kumar M.Sc.,Ph.D.,
Assistant Professor, Chemist and Social Scientist
Department of Science and Humanities
Francis Xavier Engineering College
Scad Group of Institutions
Tirunelveli Tamil Nadu 627 003 India.
mob. 91 9952885464
http://journalspub.com/journalspub/EditorBiography.aspx?editorid=1383

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dr_Sudalai_Kumar_S/contributions

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

On perusal of the complaints listed above, it is seen that the issue raised relates to civil dispute, such as property rights, contractual obligations and the like, hence not entertainable by the commission as per the Regulation 9(vii) of the National Human Rights Commission (Procedure) Amendment Regulations, 1997 which reads as follows: “9. Complaints not ordinarily entertainable: The Commission may dismiss in limini complaints of the following nature: (vii) The issue raised relates to civil dispute, such as property rights, contractual obligations and the like,”

Preeti Singh
2 years ago

Think about the gravity of situation that repeated complaints are being made by the public spirited people to accountable public functionaries but they are not responding is not reflection of insolence, arbitrariness and tyranny.