In the D.G.P. office, Home secretary office and other police offices, R.T.I. Communiques are not touched

In the D.G.P. office, Home secretary office and other police offices, R.T.I. Communiques are not touched.

19 July 2020

20:01

Subject

In the D.G.P. office, Home secretary office and other police offices, R.T.I. Communiques are not touched.

From

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

To

rti.dgphq-up@gov.in; pmosb; supremecourt; presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; urgent-action; cmup; csup@up.nic.in; hgovup@up.nic.in; sec.sic@up.nic.in

Sent

19 July 2020 19:44

Attachments

DGP.pdf

श्री मान जी माननीय राष्ट्रपति महोदय के कार्यालय द्वारा अग्रसारित प्रार्थी का पत्र मुख्य मंत्री उत्तर प्रदेश कार्यालय द्वारा पुलिस महानिदेशक लखनऊ को पृष्ठांकित किया गया और सूचनार्थ प्रार्थी को भी प्रतिलिपि प्रेषित की गयी सत्य है | पत्र संलग्न है जिसके अनुसार प्रार्थी को कृत कार्यवाही से अवगत कराया जाना था |

उत्तर प्रदेश पुलिस की आराजकता से कौन नही परिचित है और प्रार्थी जो खुद भ्रष्टाचार विरोधी के रूप में सक्रिय है तो वह पूर्व में ही परिचित है पुलिस की कार्यशैली से | मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय के कहने से पुलिस महानिदेशक लखनऊ कार्यालय प्रार्थी को सूचना उपलब्ध कराएगा असम्भव |

इसलिए प्रार्थी द्वारा जन सूचना अधिकार २००५ का सहारा लिया गया | किन्तु प्रार्थी इस बात से भी भली भाति परिचित है की किस तरह से प्रदेश का गृह सचिव कार्यालय जनसूचना अधिकार २००५ को धूल चटा चूका है | कुछ साथी हमारे प्रत्यावेदन को समझना चाहते है इसलिए आंग्ल भाषा के स्थान पर मात्रि भाषा पर भी जोर दे रहा हूँ |

The matter is concerned with the president secretariat reference number-P2-A/0908190127/2019 dated-09/08/2019 which was forwarded by Sunil Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Secretary, Chief Minister Office, Government of Uttar Pradesh through a communication dated-13/12/2019 addressed to D.G.P. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh attached as the first page to document. Please provide the information as sought,

1-Notings and minutes of proceedings.

2-Cause of delay in providing action taken report.

3-Name and designation of the staffs processing the matter.

4-If more time will be taken, then provide duration.

श्री मान जी शिकायत का निस्तारण तो उसी समय हो जाता है जब मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय जब मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय राष्ट्रपति कार्यालय को पत्र भेज देता है क्योकि उसके पश्चात तो कोई कार्यवाही होती नही अन्यथा सूचना नही उपलब्ध नही करा देते |

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Honble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.

2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the status of the R.T.I. Communique submitted by the information seeker on the online portal of government of Uttar Pradesh.

Registration Number

DGPOF/R/2020/60215

Name

Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing

07/06/2020

Status

REQUEST UNDER PROCESS as on 22/06/2020

Details of PIO:- Telephone Number:-, Email Id:- rti.dgphq-up@gov.in

Note:- You are advised to contact the above-mentioned officer for further details.

  Nodal Officer Details

Telephone Number

9454401951

Email-ID

rti.dgphq-up@gov.in

3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the application submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 concerned with the working of D.G.P. Lucknow.

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details:-

* Public Authority

Director-General of Police Office

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number

DGPOF/R/2020/60215

Date of Filing

07/06/2020

* Name

Yogi M P Singh

Gender

Male

* Address

Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Pincode

231001

Country

India

State

Uttar Pradesh

Status

Details not provided

Pincode

Literate

Above Graduate

Phone Number

Details not provided

Mobile Number

+91-7379105911

Email-ID

yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details:-

Citizenship

Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line?

No

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought

The matter is concerned with the president secretariat reference number-P2-A/0908190127/2019 dated-09/08/2019 which was forwarded by Sunil Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Secretary, Chief Minister Office, Government of Uttar Pradesh through a communication dated-13/12/2019 addressed to D.G.P. Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh attached as the first page to document. Please provide the information as sought,

1-Notings and minutes of proceedings.

2-Cause of delay in providing action taken report.

3-Name and designation of the staffs processing the matter.

4-If more time will be taken, then provide duration.

* Concerned PIO

MANOJ KUMAR AWASTHI

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

1 October 2019 at 01:56

4-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that

To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement

.

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the following submissions.

Most respected Superintendent of police, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number-135 H/C Year 2006 as follows-

It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take an appropriate remedy. Dated-07/03/2006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justices of Division bench of Lucknow. It would be better to take perusal by Sir itself.

Respondent-1-State of U.P. through Secretary of home.

2-S.S.P. Lucknow 3-S.H.O. Ashiyana Police station.

Whether competent court means police as defined by the aforementioned respondents?

To open the lock of the door and open the door for seeking appropriate remedy means to open the door for always and hatching a conspiracy against the applicant and his family.

Consequently, a fabricated First Information Report by colluding with the police was lodged in the police station Ashiyana on 11 July 2009 after 3 years 4 months 4 days of Judgement Dated-07/03/2006 -under sections of I.P.C. as case number-269/2009 Indian Penal Code- sections 448,406,420,467,468,471,394 of India Penal Code.

All these documents were submitted by the police before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the court took the cognizance and passed the order per the law but later on police found the records forged and aforementioned fabricated charges not only framed on the applicant but his wife and daughter as well. Thus terrorised entire family so they fled by putting locks in the rooms latter locks were broken and the entire house was grabbed even valuables were looted. Which means Lucknow police had submitted forged records before the High court along with the affidavit.

Thus a competent and appropriate court delivered the Judgement in the matter in compliance of the High court order Dated-07/03/2006.

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |

             इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

                     This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-19/07/2020           Yours sincerely

                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Preeti Singh
Preeti Singh
4 months ago

Whether competent court means police as defined by the aforementioned respondents?

To open the lock of the door and open the door for seeking appropriate remedy means to open the door for always and hatching a conspiracy against the applicant and his family.
Whether it is not anarchy as done by the police of the state capital Lucknow? Whether such act of state police is not proving the jungle rule in the state?

Pratima Parihar
Pratima Parihar
4 months ago

2-एसएसपी लखनऊ 3-एसएचओ आशियाना थाना।

क्या सक्षम न्यायालय पुलिस है देश के किस कानून द्वारा परिभाषित है ?

दरवाजे का ताला खोलने के लिए इसलिए कहा गया की नियम सम्मत हल की तलाश के लिए वादिनी कई नाम धारण करने वाली अनुराधा /आराधना सिंह या गुड्डी को कोई परेशानी न हो और न कि हमेशा के लिए दरवाजा खोलना और आवेदक दिनेश प्रताप सिंह व उसके परिवार के खिलाफ साजिश रचना। पुलिस के साथ क्या यह अराजकता नहीं है }

Arun Pratap Singh
4 months ago

श्री मान जी शिकायत का निस्तारण तो उसी समय हो जाता है जब मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय जब मुख्य मंत्री कार्यालय राष्ट्रपति कार्यालय को पत्र भेज देता है क्योकि उसके पश्चात तो कोई कार्यवाही होती नही अन्यथा सूचना नही उपलब्ध नही करा देते |
Whether it is the reflection of good governance as claimed by our political masters? Whether police of the state capital Lucknow can provide the civil remedy to multi named lady Anuradha Singh as order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad?

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
4 months ago

Here it is quite obvious that Incompetence of the Information Commissioner is responsible for the dilapidated state of the provisions of Right to Information act 2005 as they are not in position to handle the the deteriorating system of this August act which is because of corruption in the government machinery. Both the corruption and transparency are contrary to each other so both cannot Run simultaneously.