If we have good governance at the centre ,then additional payment taken by public authority will be refunded.

The fault on the part of state bank of India is that it couldn’t secure the transaction and fault on the part of CRPF is that it took the multiple payments against same application numbers.

Gmail – Whether multiple times fee can be charged from an aspirant .pdf
228K View as HTML Scan and download
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original


Add star  

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

AttachmentMon, May 30, 2016 at 8:03 PM
To: jscpg-mha@nic.in, dg@crpf.gov.in
Whether it is justified that additional amount paid still not refunded back into the account of your applicant. 

Grievance Status

Print || Logout
Status as on 30 May 2016

Registration Number : MINHA/E/2016/01980
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 08 May 2016
Received by : Ministry of Home Affairs
Forwarded to : Central Reserve police Force
Officer name : Shri Prakash Mishra
Officer Designation : Director General
Contact Address : CGO Complex
New Delhi
Contact Number : 24360971
Grievance Description : Whether multiple times fee can be charged from an aspirant . Four times from Alok Bhardwaj and two times from Mohammad Akaram.According to state bank of India ,matter is concerned with C.R.P.F. As S.B.I. Paid all amount as transacted to C.R.P.F. So grievance awaits redressal at the end of accountable public functionaries of C.R.P.F. Your applicant is an unemployed youth /citizen ,some how arranges two square meal for family. Please help your applicant. With due respect your applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that C.R.P.F. can charge Rs.100 per application as described in the notification from General/O.B.C. As prescribed in the notification issued in the recruitment C.R.P.F. Head constable ministerial post. It is unfortunate that following amounts were additionally charged from the account of your applicant. When your applicant made payment fourth time in the Alok Bhardwaj case and second time in Mohammad Akaram case ,then print out could be taken , right now earlier paid amount must be refunded back into the account of your applicant. Following transactions are additionally charged fee and in accordance with law ,concerned may return back to paying body. Account Statement for the period 25/04/2016 to 26/04/2016 Account Number 00000034645721675 Branch MIRZAPUR CITY Address S/O RAJENDRA PRATAP Dear sir, As per details the above txns are successful at our bank end. The transaction of the same is pending at CRPF end , the unreconciled entries of these type of txn takes some time for reconciliation. We are also trying with best efforts for solve the problem. Yours faithfully S.P.Gupta Branch Manager SBI Mirzapur city Br. For detail please take a glance of attachments. As per INB Department the undernoted txns are successful and transferred to Beneficiary i.e. CRPF. Kindly arrange to contact them for Refund. Y/F S.P.GUPTA BM MIRZAPUR CITY Br.
Current Status : UNDER PROCESS
Date of Action : 25 May 2016

With due respect your applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken on the following submitted grievance 

Grievance Status

Print || Logout
Status as on 30 May 2016

Registration Number : MINHA/E/2016/02176
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 19 May 2016
Received by : Ministry of Home Affairs
Officer name : Shri V. Shashank Shekhar
Officer Designation : Joint Secretary C &amp PG
Contact Address : Room No. 188,
North Block,
New Delhi110001
Contact Number : 23092392
e-mail : jscpg-mha@nic.in
Grievance Description : Illegally deducted amount from the account of your applicant must be refunded back into the account of your applicant. With due respect your applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that according to staffs of state bank of India , they have paid the amount which was shown by the C.R.P.F. Website failed. Consequently C.R.P.F./Home ministry must be obliged to redress the grievance. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of attached document with this representation. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that state bank of India also can’t escape from the accountability as it remained failed to ensure security of the transaction and get back the additional paid amount to public authority C.R.P.F. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that when C.R.P.F. had to charge Rs.100.00 per candidate aspiring for recruitment of Head constable ministerial post ,then how it charged Rs.400.00 from Alok Bhardwaj and Rs.200.00 from Mohammad Akaram. Which caused the loss of Rs.400.00 +Rs.48.00 as commission to your poor applicant and most surprising is that aforesaid amount was not refunded back into the account of your applicant. What is the motive of these two public authorities is too much cryptic? From the working style of public authorities ,it seems that such malpractices are quite common and they never return and such amounts make their pockets heavy. This is humble request of your appellant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your appellant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.                                       ‘Yours  sincerely                             Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911 Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India
Current Status : RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken on the following submitted griev———- Forwarded message ———-

Status as on 30 May 2016

Registration Number : MINHA/E/2016/01793
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 27 Apr 2016
Received by : Ministry of Home Affairs
Forwarded to : Central Reserve police Force
Officer name : Shri Prakash Mishra
Officer Designation : Director General
Contact Address : CGO Complex
New Delhi
Contact Number : 24360971
Grievance Description : Hon’ble Sir-APPLICATION NO -8004092 name-Alok Bhardwaj ,your applicant submitted Rs,300 as fee in three times while required for application only Rs.100 but still couldn’t print the application.With due respect your applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that When your applicant made efforts to print the application ,then message displayed on the screen as-please make payment. 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Website transaction detail is as follows- Central Reserve Police Force Peace keeper to the Nation Government of India, Thanks Success APPLICATION NO -8004092 SBI TRANSACTION IGOBWMDER4 NUMBER: PAID AMOUNT -100 YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: 1725622 TRANSACTICTION STATUS: Success STATUS DESCRIPTION Completed successfully. 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Here this question arises that when required fee against aforesaid application number is Rs.100 ,then how Rs.200 more could be accepted by the website of public institution and still it is displaying on the screen that please make payment when your applicant making efforts to print the submitted application. Whether this is not open loot by public functionary. 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant has done five such transaction and per transaction Rs.12 deducted from the account of your applicant as commission and most unfortunate is that S.B.I. itself articulates as – Dear Sir/Madam, Thank you for writing to us at State Bank Contact Centre. We regret for the inconvenience caused to you. With reference to your grievance, we would like to inform you that there is no charges for Merchant Transaction through internet banking from State Bank of India.
Current Status : UNDER PROCESS
Date of Action : 17 May 2016
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether any action was taken on the following submitted grievance 

Grievance Status

Print || Logout
Status as on 30 May 2016

Registration Number : MINHA/E/2016/01980
Name Of Complainant : Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt : 08 May 2016
Received by : Ministry of Home Affairs
Forwarded to : Central Reserve police Force
Officer name : Shri Prakash Mishra
Officer Designation : Director General
Contact Address : CGO Complex
New Delhi
Contact Number : 24360971
Grievance Description : Whether multiple times fee can be charged from an aspirant . Four times from Alok Bhardwaj and two times from Mohammad Akaram.According to state bank of India ,matter is concerned with C.R.P.F. As S.B.I. Paid all amount as transacted to C.R.P.F. So grievance awaits redressal at the end of accountable public functionaries of C.R.P.F. Your applicant is an unemployed youth /citizen ,some how arranges two square meal for family. Please help your applicant. With due respect your applicant/petitioner wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that C.R.P.F. can charge Rs.100 per application as described in the notification from General/O.B.C. As prescribed in the notification issued in the recruitment C.R.P.F. Head constable ministerial post. It is unfortunate that following amounts were additionally charged from the account of your applicant. When your applicant made payment fourth time in the Alok Bhardwaj case and second time in Mohammad Akaram case ,then print out could be taken , right now earlier paid amount must be refunded back into the account of your applicant. Following transactions are additionally charged fee and in accordance with law ,concerned may return back to paying body. Account Statement for the period 25/04/2016 to 26/04/2016 Account Number 00000034645721675 Branch MIRZAPUR CITY Address S/O RAJENDRA PRATAP Dear sir, As per details the above txns are successful at our bank end. The transaction of the same is pending at CRPF end , the unreconciled entries of these type of txn takes some time for reconciliation. We are also trying with best efforts for solve the problem. Yours faithfully S.P.Gupta Branch Manager SBI Mirzapur city Br. For detail please take a glance of attachments. As per INB Department the undernoted txns are successful and transferred to Beneficiary i.e. CRPF. Kindly arrange to contact them for Refund. Y/F S.P.GUPTA BM MIRZAPUR CITY Br.
Current Status : UNDER PROCESS
Date of Action : 25 May 2016
From: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:56 PM
Subject: Please additional amount deducted from my account must be refunded back into my account in accordance with the law.
To: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>


Gmail – Whether multiple times fee can be charged from an aspirant .pdf
228K View as HTML Scan and download

2 comments on If we have good governance at the centre ,then additional payment taken by public authority will be refunded.

  1. Whether multiple times fee can be charged from an aspirant . Four times from Alok Bhardwaj and two times from Mohammad Akaram.According to state bank of India ,matter is concerned with C.R.P.F. As S.B.I. Paid all amount as transacted to C.R.P.F. So grievance awaits redressal at the end of accountable public functionaries of C.R.P.F. Your applicant is an unemployed youth /citizen ,some how arranges two square meal for family.

  2. Think about the gravity of situation that government which is indulged in looting its citizenry, how can be sympathizers to its citizenry as both are contradictory. Many schemes and plans are made only to cheat the public.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: