If this is not anarchy ,then what is anarchy?

To
                 Chief Justice of India /Companion Judges
                       Supreme court of India , New Delhi ,India
Petitioner-Mahesh Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh)
Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh),Mobile number-7379105911
                 Versus
Respondents- 1-Pricipal secretary
Urban Development Ministry , Government of Uttar Pradesh ,Lucknow
2-District Magistrate
District-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)
3-Executive officer ,Municipality Mirzapur city
District-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)
Index and pages of the petition is as follows.
1-Original petition in 46 pages i.e. from page 1 to 46 .
2-Verdict delivered in Civil appeal No.4916 of 2015 arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.662 of 2014 from page 47 to 58 .
3-Copy of petition for respondent -1.
4-Copy of petition for respondent -2
5-Copy of petition for respondent -3.
6-Ration card of petitioner as identity proof.
To
                 Chief Justice of India /Companion Judges
                       Supreme court of India , New Delhi ,India
Petitioner-Mahesh Pratap Singh (Yogi M. P. Singh)
Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)
                 Versus
Respondents- 1-Pricipal secretary
Urban Development Ministry , Government of Uttar Pradesh ,Lucknow
2-District Magistrate
District-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)
3-Executive officer ,Municipality Mirzapur city
District-Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh)
Prayer-Non-payment of minimum wages to workers and exploitation of casual
workers and complaints of violation of Labour Laws (except in individual
cases).Matter is concerned with weaker section /under privileged class whose fundamental rights/constitutional rights  crushed by state functionaries. Their condition is so deplorable that they can’t hire lawyers in order to safeguard their fundamental rights guaranteed to them under constitution.
Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to pass an order in order to provide the justice to Lakhs of families whose dream was snatched by arbitrary action of the state functionaries.   
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Article 51A in The Constitution Of India 1949

51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the national Flag and the National Anthem;
(b) to cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom;
(c) to uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India;
(d) to defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so;
(e) to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women;
(f) to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture;
(g) to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have compassion for living creatures;
(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement PART V THE UNION CHAPTER I THE EXECUTIVE The President and Vice President
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Article 32 in The Constitution Of India 1949

32. Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part
(1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed
(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part
(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clause ( 1 ) and ( 2 ), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause ( 2 )
(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of the representations made by the staffs of municipality  Mirzapur city  times and again in order to seek justice from the public functionaries of government of Uttar Pradesh. It  is most unfortunate that those recommended for regularization on the direction of government itself were made on paper staffs of Satyam construction company and Municipality still taking their services since year 1997 ipsofacto obvious from the communications of municipality Mirzapur city. Whether such ruthless approach of state functionaries are justified with such vulnerable staffs of municipality Mirzapur city who are illiterate and so poor that not competent to defend their interests in the court of law or any where .  

Emoluments of salary paid to these vulnerable staffs of municipality is Rs.170 .00 per days which is less than minimum wages decided by the government of Uttar Pradesh itself.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether this is rule of law where rights of poor and downtrodden section are no more safe.
3 messages

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:43 PM
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>
Cc: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>
Bcc: cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, csup <csup@up.nic.in>
Whether in the name of work charge establishment and regular establishment , citizenry belonging to weaker and downtrodden section can be allowed to subject of exploitation by crushing their fundamental/human rights.
27 March 2016
10:20
To
                         Chief Justice of India /Companion Judges
                         Supreme court of India ,New Delhi
Prayer-Whether in the name of work charge establishment and regular establishment , citizenry belonging to weaker and downtrodden section can be allowed to subject of exploitation by crushing their fundamental/human rights. Please take a glance of attachments with this representation.
With due respect your appellant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether the article 14 of constitution of India does not imply equal pay for equal services. How the court can allow discrimination on the ground of work charge establishment and regular establishment. If the government is taking services of citizenry ,whether he may be employed in the work charge establishment or regular establishment may be provided same remuneration for same services . How the service charge can differ from one individual to other individual. Your applicant even have regard for the temple of justice but not such practice which cause adversary to rights of citizens guaranteed under part 3 of constitution of India.
Central Government Act
Article 14 in The Constitution Of India 1949
14. Equality before law The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that but service charge must be same whatever may be their special  rights as a regular staffs of government . Whether illiterate poor and downtrodden section can be subjected to exploitation in the name of non regularized in services. Hon’ble Sir in the municipality Mirzapur city ,most of the employees are working on contract basis one and half dozen  since 19 years and few retired without being permanent and now since 2013 ,all the staffs made the staffs of Satyam construction company on paper and providing meagre wages far more less than minimum pay scale as prescribed by government itself. Whether this is not anarchy going on in our system and public functionaries are mute spectators of it.
14. The ratio of the abovementioned judgments is that work-charged employees constitute a distinct class and they cannot be equated with any other category or class of employees much less regular employees and further that the work-charged employees are not entitled to the service benefits which are admissible to regular employees under the relevant rules or policy framed by the employer.”(emphasis supplied) 
Subsequently a Full Bench of this Court in Pawan Kumar Yadav Vs. State of U.P.8 ruled on the issue by holding that a work-charged employee does not work against any temporary or permanent post or even on a tenure post. Ruling upon the status of work-charged employees, the Full Bench held that these employees do not hold any post and are merely employed by the State for implementation of various projects and schemes and that their services are co-terminus to the work or the scheme in which they are engaged. The Full Bench, it may be noted, was dealing with the right of a dependant of a daily-wage or work-charged employee to obtain compassionate appointment under the U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servant (Dying in Harness) Rules, 1974. The issue itself was answered in the following terms: 
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether it is Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment where a contract worker retires/dies by performing services of government on meagre emolument of salary. Whether this is not reflection of cruel private contractor in our government.
PART III  
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 
Right to Equility 
16. Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment.– 
(1) There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State. 
(2) No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, residence or any of them, be ineligible for, or discriminated against in respect of, any employment or office under the State. 
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that how the public resources can be left on the discretion of those who think that they are not manager but master and issue arbitrary circulars in order to gratify individual interest. Where is democracy if tyranny and arbitrariness in the public system may be predominant .
“26. On the aforesaid discussion, and in view of the law laid down in General Manager, Uttaranchal Jal Sansthan Vs. Laxmi Devi (Supra), we answer the questions posed as follows: – 
1. A daily wager and workcharge employee employed in connection with the affairs of the Uttar Pradesh, who is not holding any post, whether substantive or temporary, and is not appointed in any regular vacancy, even if he was working for more than 3 years, is not a ‘Government servant’ within the meaning of Rule 2 (a) of U.P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servant (Dying in Harness) Rules, 1974, and thus his dependants on his death in harness are not entitled to compassionate appointment under these Rules.” 
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether state functionaries are not exploiting the poor and downtrodden section financially ,physically and mentally by providing meagre salary too much less than the salary /minimum wages prescribed by them itself . Most surprising is that this poor labour class is not provided single day leave even on Sunday. Whether rest and leisure is not human right of an individual.  Even on gazetted holiday ,festivals ,if they don’t attend services ,then their salary is deducted. In the name regular establishment ,salary of day of strikes is not deducted whether it is fair.
·         PART III
·         FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
·         Right to Equility
·         15. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth.-(1) The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.
(2) No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them, be subject to any disability, liability, restriction or condition with regard to-
6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of judgement delivered by larger bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad headed by chief justice itself.
We accordingly answer the reference by holding that the period of service spent by a person in a work charged establishment is not liable to be counted for the purposes of computing qualifying service. Regulation 370 of the Civil Service Regulations continues to govern and hold the field. The factual backdrop in which Narata Singh came to be rendered escaped the attention of the various Division Benches which followed it despite the existence of the unambiguous command of Regulation 370. Jai Prakash and the subsequent pronouncements following it and referred to above represent the correct position in law. The matter shall now be placed before the learned Single Judge for a decision on the writ petition in the light of what has been held above. 
Order Date: February 18, 2016 
Arun K. Singh 
(Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, C.J.) 
(M.K. Gupta, J.) 
(Yashwant Varma, J.) 
7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that High court is protector of constitution and citizens  from the arbitrariness of the state functionaries but it seems that God is sole protector of us .
PART III
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
General
·         13. Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights.-
·         (1) All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void. 
·         (2) The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void.
                          
This is humble request of your appellant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your appellant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                               Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .

3 attachments
Contract workers of municipality are really its staff obvious from documents..pdf
1116K
Shivram Yadav sought information from PIO ,Principal secretatry, urban development.pdf
858K
Shivram Yadav was made available incomplete misleading information..pdf
2172K

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:00 PM
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>
Cc: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>
Respondent number -1 still not complied the order of court completely but why contempt of court proceedings is not being initiated. Every one is alike before law and have equal protection of law but where?
Today your applicant will draw the kind attention on the judgement which  snatched the dream of thousands and grave injustice to poor and downtrodden section.
02 April 2016
22:03
Every coin has two sides like wise each decision /act consists of two aspects i.e. Positive and negative aspect and which aspect accepted depends on the mentality of actor . An actor who accepts positive aspect inculcate good virtues and becomes great that is why it is rightly said that man is great by his deeds and character nothing else.
 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD  A.F.R.  Reserved on: 6.5.2014  Delivered on : 26.5.2014  Court No. 58  Case :­ WRIT ­ A No. ­ 40236 of 2012  Petitioner :­Asifuddin & Another  Respondent :­ State Of U.P.& Others  Counsel for Petitioner 
In view of the above noted facts and circumstances, a direction is issued to the respondent no. 1 to ensure strict compliance of the Government order dated 6.12.1991 and 24.4.2013 and submit compliance report before this Court within three months, giving details of total payments made by the Local Bodies in Uttar Pradesh to illegally appointed dailywagers/contract employees, action taken for realization of the amount so paid in contravention of the Government order dated 6.12.1991 and Government order dated 24.4.2013. Respondent no. 1 shall also ensure strict compliance of the Government orders dated 6.12.1991 and 23.7.2012 by all local bodies in Uttar Pradesh. Action taken report be submitted before this Court by respondent no. 1 by filing his personal affidavit on 01.09.2014.  39. In view of the above discussions, all the writ petitions fail and are hereby dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to cost. Compliance report as directed above be submitted by the respondent no. 1 on or before 01.09.2014.  Order Date:­ 26.5.2014  Dhirendra
Whether amount paid illegally was realized by the government of Uttar Pradesh if not then reflection of impotency of the court in regard to get compliance of its own order. After all no justice is available to poor and downtrodden section in this country. Since ages they remained the subject of exploitation by the aristocrats.
Here matter is bipolar and poles are 1-employee and 2-employer and if employer illegally employed the employee ,then for this illegal act employer is not accountable alone. Why only poor working class was subjected to penal action by terminating their services by overlooking the longer period of their services on meagre emolument of salary too much less than minimum wages as prescribed by government from time to time . Verdict was delivered on 26/05/2014 thus near about two years passed but it is my challenged that still this order of the court was not complied in full length by respondent number 1. Respondent number 1 only targeted the poor and downtrodden section. 
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                      ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
[Quoted text hidden]

JUDGMENT_ORDER IN – WRIT – A No. 40236 of 2012 at Allahabad Dated-26.5.2014 CASE TITLE – Asifuddin & Another Vs. State Of U.P.pdf
413K

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:13 PM
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>
Cc: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>
Whether the judgement delivered on 26/05/2014 by the Hon’ble High court of judicature at Allahabad was complied by the concerned staffs of the government of Uttar Pradesh. If not complied by the concerned ,then contempt of court proceedings may be initiated against those who disobeyed the court order. 
04 April 2016
08:47
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of the latest status of the case –
Case Status – Allahabad
Pending
Writ – A / 63834 / 2012 [Farrukhabad]
Petitioner:
SUBODH KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERS
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P.THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ORS.
Counsel (Pet.):
AVANISH MISHRA
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Local Bodies Staff (single Bench)-Miscellaneous
Date of Filing:
05/12/2012
Last Listed on:
17/03/2016 in Court No. 1
Next Listing Date:
To be listed on 19/01/2017
Connected Case(s):
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following order was passed in the aforesaid case-
eLegalix  AUahabad High Court Judgment Information System
   (Judgment/Order In Text Formal)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No.  1
Case :-WRIT-A No. -63834 at 2012
And 63835
Petitioner Subodh Kumar Gupta And Others
Respondent – Stale Of U.P. through PrinciaI Secratry & Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Avanish Mishra. AK.Malviya, Anoop Trivedi ,Atul Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. .Pradeep Verma
Honbie Surya Prakash Kesarwani ,J.
Heard learned counsel for the patties
Sri Ashok Kumar Pandey. learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State respondents has filed today anaffidavit of compliance of Dr. Anil Kumar Slngh, Special Secretary. Urban Development, Government of U.P., L.ucknow, which is taken on record.
In paragraph Nos. 8,9,10,11,12 and 13 of the said affidavit It has been stated as under:
• 8. That the Directorate, Local Bodies, U.P. vide Its letter dated 5.11.2015 provided the information with regard to total 613 Local Bode out of 630 Local Bodies ( 14 municipaI Corporation. 193-Nagar PaIika Parishads and 406- Nagar Panchayats ). The information regarding 17 Nagar Panchayats are still awaited. A true copy of the letter dated5.11.2015 along with report at 613 Local Bodies, are being filed herewith and marked as Annexure-5 to this Personal affidavit,
• ,9. That it Is stated that this Honbie Coral vide its order dated 26.5.2014 passed in Writ Petition No 40236 at 2012, was pleased  to direct the following steps to be taken.
I   ,  to give details of total payments made by the Local Bodies in Uttar Pradesh to illegally appointed daily wagers/contract employees.
L  , action taken for realization of the amount so paid in contravention of the Government Order dated 06.12.1991 andGovernment  Order dated 24.4.2013.
10. Thai so far as the first part of the order dated 26.5.2O14 is concerned, the Director of the Local Bodies hassubmitted as report on 5.11.2015 on prescribed format disclosing therein the total number of daily wagers/contract employees engaged in various Local Bodies.
11. That so for as the total payment of illegally appointees is concerned, it is to be worked out at Directorate level and the same may be worked out soon.
12. That so for as the action taken for realization of amount,  another part of the order is concerned, it requires some time as I involves 630 Municipal Bodies and that too the payments was made during the period they worked.
13. That in view of the mailer to ensure compliance of this Honbie Court in letter and spirit, it Is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant appropriate time to enable the State respondents to comply with the order of this Hon’ble Court.
Perusal at the aforesaid affidavit filed on behalf of the State Government, shows that the exercise of identifying illegal and unconstitutional appointments made by the authorities/ office bearers of Local Bodies have almost been completed.The exercise has been done in respect of 613 Local Bodies out of 630 Local Bodies. Learned Additional Advocate General states that the information with regard to I7 Nagar Panchayats shall be obtained within a week.
In paragraph-11  of the said affidavit it is stated that the total payments made to Illegal appointees shal be worked out soon at Directorate level and thereafter In paragraph 12 It is stated that action shall be taken for realization of the amount from the concerned persons.
As prayed by the learned Additional Advocate General, put up on 26.11.2015 on which date an affidavit of compliance containing complete details with respect to the statement made in paragraph no.11 of the aforequoted affidavit shall be filed by the Principal Secretay, Urban Development, Government of U.P.. Lucknow. OrderDate-6.11.2015
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that on 10-November-2015 Director ,Urban body ,Uttar Pradesh ,eighth floor Lucknow directed all Nagar Aayukta ,Nagar Nigams  ,Uttar Pradesh and Executive Officers , Nagar Palika Parishads /Nagar Panchaayats ,Uttar Pradesh (by D.M. Mirzapur ) ,all payments made  to illegal appointee (as declared by High court of judicature at Allahabad in verdict delivered on 26/05/2014)  from the government fund must be realised from  the appointers . This information in regard to recovery of illegal payments must be made available within one week as directed by government. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD  A.F.R. 
Reserved on: 6.5.2014  Delivered on : 26.5.2014  Court No. 58 
Case :­ WRIT ­ A     No. ­ 40236 of 2012 
Petitioner :­ Asifuddin & Another  Respondent :­ State Of U.P.& Others
In view of the above noted facts and circumstances, a direction is issued to the respondent no. 1 to ensure
strict compliance of the Government order dated 6.12.1991 and 24.4.2013 and submit compliance report before this Court within three months, giving details of total payments made by the Local Bodies in Uttar Pradesh to illegally appointed dailywagers/contract employees, action taken for realization of the amount so paid in contravention of the Government order dated 6.12.1991 and Government order dated 24.4.2013. Respondent no. 1 shall also ensure strict compliance of the Government orders dated 6.12.1991 and 23.7.2012 by all local bodies in Uttar Pradesh. Action taken report be submitted before this Court by respondent no. 1 by filing his personal affidavit on 01.09.2014.  39. In view of the above discussions, all the writ petitions fail and are hereby dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to cost. Compliance report as directed above be submitted by the respondent no. 1 on or before 01.09.2014.  Order Date:­ 26.5.2014  Dhirendra 
 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that thousands of daily wagers/contract staffs were terminated from the service as consequent of aforesaid verdict of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the dreams their family members shattered in one stroke of judiciary of government of India.
 6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that here this question arises that whether it is the job unemployed youth the ascertain that whether he is being appointed by the public functionary (appointer)by pursuing all standard set up norms or not. Whether lacunae on the part of appointer may cause penal action against poor contract staffs of government . Whether the act of employer is subjected to the scrutiny of employee. Here defaulters are those who are appointers and those who are accountable monitor the acts of appointer.
7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that most surprising is that those providing services on meagre amount were terminated from the service of government by making them staffs of contractors although government is taking their services in different form even at this time but those wrongdoers played entire drama are still spared by the court. Whether such verdict cryptic in nature will not promote anarchy in the system. If the appointment is illegal ,then who are accountable for such appointments? If the payment is illegal ,then who have done this illegal payment must be recovered from them ?
8-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that every one is alike before the law and every one has equal protection of law. On one side of screen thousands of contract workers belonging to weaker section were terminated from services but on other side influential bureaucrats accountable for this wrongdoings were spared by making mockery of the court order. Whether appointers can’t be terminated from the service even after reaping the benefit of entire episode.
                                  
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                      ‘Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:
[Quoted text hidden]

2 attachments
JUDGMENT_ORDER IN – WRIT – A No. 40236 of 2012 at Allahabad Dated-26.5.2014 CASE TITLE – Asifuddin & Another Vs. State Of U.P.pdf
413K
Whether direction of High court of judicature complied in letter and spirit.pdf
267K

2 comments on If this is not anarchy ,then what is anarchy?

  1. Undoubtedly corruption is our main foe and it can be curbed only when honest may be provided due respect. Here in this largest democracy in the world, honesty is speculated by public functionaries on public fora only but behind the screen their real faces are exposed. This is bitter truth but one has to accept it. Now a days, public interest litigation meant to provide justice to weaker section is misused to achieve ulterior designs.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: