If matter was forwarded by DOJ to registrar general High court Alld then why procrastination

Following are the attachments sent by the department of justice, government of India to the applicant and registrar general High court of judicature at Allahabad.

Yogi M. P. Singh 1

Yogi M. P. Singh encl 1

 

 

 

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Grievance of Yogi M. P. Singh
2 messages

Department of Justice <pg-doj@gov.in> 10 January 2020 at 12:09
To: rg allahabad High Court <rg@allahabadhighcourt.in>
Cc: yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Sir/Madam,
                   Please see the attachments on the above subject for action as appropriate, under intimation to the petitioner.
Hemendra Singh
Section Officer (Justice-I) 
Department of Justice

 

2 attachments
Yogi M. P. Singh 1.pdf
60K
Yogi M. P. Singh encl 1.pdf
955K

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 12 January 2020 at 22:33
To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, “rg@allahabadhighcourt.in” <rg@allahabadhighcourt.in>, cj <cj@allahabadhighcourt.in>

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that applicant submitted the grievance on 01/12/2019 before the department of justice, Government of India.

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Department of Justice through its Joint Secretary,   Smt Sushma Taishete forwarded the grievance to registrar general High court of judicature at Allahabad on 04/12/2019 after due processing as the matter was concerned with the working of the public authority High court of judicature at Allahabad.

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that on 09/12/2019, the grievance was considered disposed on the ground that matter has been forwarded to the High court of judicature at Allahabad for the appropriate action as the working of the district judge Lucknow comes under the ambit/purview of the  High court of Judicature.

4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that today is 12/Jan-2020 which means more than one month passed but no action was taken on the part of registrar general, High court of Judicature at Allahabad ipso facto obvious that no intimation was communicated in regard to action taken by the Registrar General High court of Judicature at Allahabad on the representation submitted by the applicant.

5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the grievance submitted by the applicant on behalf of the  aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh whose house and land have been grabbed and belongings have been looted by colluding with the Lucknow police and lodging criminal cases under serious sections not only against aggrieved but his wife and daughter as well, by taking under teeth the direction passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad.

Grievance Status for registration number : DEPOJ/E/2019/04435

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt-01/12/2019

Received By Ministry/Department-Justice

Grievance Description-Presently applicant is living in the Mirzapur district at more than 200 K.M. distance from state capital Lucknow as his house has been grabbed and household articles have been looted made queries which was sent  on 13-10-2019 to additional chief judicial magistrate third through District Judge Lucknow and received in the office of District judge Lucknow on 16-10-2019 quite obvious from the attached registered post tracking. It is most unfortunate that from Mirzapur to Lucknow communication took only three days while from office of District Judge Lucknow to office of additional chief judicial magistrate third, it still not reached. Sir open court means a court or trial to which members of the public are freely admitted but here representations of the defendant is not being freely admitted. If the registered post with entire formalities fulfilled is not being accepted by the concerned authorities for open court hearing, then think about the oral argument.

An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh son of  Angad Prasad Singh living at Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, PIN Code-231001, State-Uttar Pradesh Mobile number-9838919619.Matter of fact is concerned with the court of additional chief judicial magistrate third, District court, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh in regard to crime number-269 of the year 2009 under I.P.C. Section-420,448 and 406 concerned with police station -Ashiyana. Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh ruthlessly expelled from his house by looting belongings of the house holds and other valuables by the opposite party in caucus with the police concerned by making the mockery of the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High Court of judicature at Allahabad and slapping serious charges  under aforementioned sections and many more others not only on the aggrieved applicant but also his wife who expired under trauma and daughter as well.

Grievance Document Current Status-Case closed

Date of Action-09/12/2019

Remarks-The grievance has been forwarded to Registrar General, Allahabad High Court for action, as appropriate.

Rating-Excellent

Rating Remarks-Undoubtedly concerned took swift action in accordance with the law but lackadaisical approach is on the part of High court of judicature at Allahabad. Efficiency and devotion to work of the concerned lady staff of the Department of justice of the Government is applauding. Thanks to concerned for forwarding the matter to concerned public authority accountable for the lawlessness and breakdown is praiseworthy as well.

Officer Concerns To Officer Name-Smt Sushma Taishete

Officer Designation-Joint Secretary

Contact Address-Jaisalmer House, 26 Mansingh Road, New Delhi

Email Address-jsst-doj@gov.in

Contact Number-01123385020

Pasted from <https://pgportal.gov.in/Status/Detail/DD12F7BD649946B29618DAF1469B173EF88EF7DCBCA880FBE360CEF094D524F1>

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

  Date-12-01-2020                           Yours sincerely

                                        Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,   Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

[Quoted text hidden]

 

2 attachments
Yogi M. P. Singh 1.pdf
60K
Yogi M. P. Singh encl 1.pdf
955K

3 comments on If matter was forwarded by DOJ to registrar general High court Alld then why procrastination

  1. Whether police can provide the civil remedy or police is the competent court? Whether the police informed the court in regard to the aforementioned order? Applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble court that the respondent number First is Secretary of home department, civil secretariat, Government of Uttar Pradesh and respondent number second who is senior superintendent of police Lucknow as well as the station house officer police station Ashiyana who is the respondent number 3 in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh.

  2. Whether it is not mockery of the law of land and the reflection of Anarchy that order passed by the high court of judicature at Allahabad by its Lucknow bench was overlooked by the police and did the false FIR against the aggrieved person not only against that person but also his wife and daughter by overlooking the order of the High Court is not reflection of lawlessness Anarchy and mis management in the government machinery? It is most surprising that when the matter was submitted before the court in the form of queries then concerned representation did not reach to the appropriate court from the office of district judge Lucknow.

  3. Whether it is justified if not why wrongdoers are not being put behind the bar?
    Hon’ble Sir, following is the grievance submitted by the applicant on behalf of the aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh whose house and land have been grabbed and belongings have been looted by colluding with the Lucknow police and lodging criminal cases under serious sections not only against aggrieved but his wife and daughter as well, by taking under teeth the direction passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: