If Govt can’t redress the grievance of its citizens, then it must return back to forwarding body

If Govt of Uttar Pradesh can’t redress the grievance of its citizens, then it must return back to forwarding body

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

6:54 PM

Subject

If Govt of Uttar Pradesh can’t redress the grievance of its citizens, then it must return back to forwarding body

From

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M. P. Singh

To

pmosb; cmup; supremecourt; presidentofindia@rb.nic.in; urgent-action@ohchr.org; hgovup@up.nic.in; csup@up.nic.in; uphrclko@yahoo.co.in

Sent

Tuesday, January 21, 2020 6:53 PM

Attachments

President Sir matter is concerned with judiciary but sent to Govt of U.P. – Yogi as anti-corruption crusader.pdf

President Sir matter is concerned with judiciary but sent to Govt of U.P. – Yogi as anti-corruption crusader

From the perusal of the contents of the grievance, it is quite explicit that matter is concerned with the administration of Justice so it is confirmed that matter is concerned with the high court of judicature at Allahabad and government of Uttar Pradesh.  President Secretariat forwarded the matter to the Government of Uttar Pradesh then concerned public functionaries had to forward the matter to High Court of judicature at Allahabad but instead of forwarding to the appropriate public authority they provided the matter to the District Inspector of school which is the lowermost post in the administrative hierarchy and the person who cannot understand the contents of the letter cum grievance and without checking its purview and Ambit redressed the grievance which was not concerned with the purview of district Inspector of school Mirzapur whether such practice is Constitutional and not mockery of law of land.  In the interest of Justice government of Uttar Pradesh must forward the matter to the high court of judicature at Allahabad through its department of law or chief minister office or return back to President of India by expressing inability to redress it.

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that How the case is dismissed if it is not disposed on the merit which is quite obvious from the status of the case and most relevant question is that if the matter is not concerned with the district Inspector of school Mirzapur, how can he redress the grievance arbitrarily instead of providing its viewpoint only that matter does not come under the purview of D.I.O.S. Respected Sir where is the rule of law if we are opening the gate of lawlessness and Anarchy through such arbitrary decisions and arbitrary disposal of the grievances which cannot be allowed in this largest democracy in the world as a reflection of jungle rule. If the government functionaries in the Government of Uttar Pradesh are feeling uncomfortable in redressing my grievance then they must return my grievance to the President Secretariat in the interest of justice as I have already requested you nothing else. Sir injustice cannot be tolerated by an honest person and I am doing the same whether it may be anyone irrespective of rank and status.

Undoubtedly matter is not concerned with the DIOS Mirzapur-

If the grievance is not concerned with DIOS Mirzapur how has he disposed it and blocked the path to seek the justice of aggrieved applicant

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the prayer forwarded by the office of Hon’ble President of India. Its attachment is attached to the grievance.

संदर्भ संख्या: 60000190180605, दिनांक – 21 Jan 2020 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-60000190180605

आवेदक का नामYogi M P Singh

विषय

Please direct the concerned public authority to entertain my grievance and ensure Right to Justice. The matter is serious and needs utmost attention in order to establish the faith of common people in the administration of justice in the government of India.

विभाग शिकायत श्रेणी नियोजित तारीख15-01-2020

शिकायत की स्थिति

स्तर जनपद स्तर पद जिलाधिकारी

प्राप्त रिमाइंडरप्राप्त फीडबैक

फीडबैक की स्थिति

संलग्नक देखें

Click here

नोट– अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :

क्र..

सन्दर्भ का प्रकार

आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी

आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक

आदेश/आपत्ति

आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी

आख्या दिनांक

आख्या

स्थिति

संलगनक

1

अंतरित

लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय )

16-12-2019

कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है।

जिलाधिकारीमिर्ज़ापुर,

29-12-2019

जांच आख्या अपलोड है ।

निस्तारित

2

आख्या

जिलाधिकारी ( )

17-12-2019

नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें

जिला विद्यालय निरीक्षकमिर्ज़ापुर,माध्‍यमिक शिक्षा विभाग

29-12-2019

letter no.5831 33 dated 28 12 2019 dwara nistarit

निस्तारित

Posted from <http://www.jansunwai.up.nic.in/fullCompDetailsOfUser.html?complanitcode=60000190180605&iemail=&mob=7379105911&randomkey=998247&captcha=3694&comtype=0>

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the status when the application for the restoration of appeal has been submitted in the month of July.

Case Status: Search by Case Number

Case Status – WRIT – A ( WRIA ) – [ 20121/2006 ]

Filing No.

WRIA/20121/2006

Filing Date: 10-04-2006

CNR

UPHC011291832006

Date of Registration : 10-04-2006

Case Status

First Hearing Date

08th January 2018

Date of Decision

17th April 2019

Case Status

Case Disposed

Nature of Disposal

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non-Prosec./Abated)

Stage of Case

For Admission

Coram ( Hon’ble Mr./Ms./Dr. Justice )

SUNEET KUMAR ( 5038 )

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

WRITS Civil

Cause list Type

State

UTTAR PRADESH

District

MIRZAPUR

Petitioner/Respondent and their Advocate(s)

Petitioner

Respondent

RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH

Advocate – P.C. CHAUHAN, P.S.CHAUHAN, S.P. SINGH

STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

Advocate – C.S.C.

Category Details

Category

WRIT PETITIONS RELATING TO SECONDARY EDUCATION (NON TEACHING STAFF) (SINGLE BENCH) ( 15900 )

Sub Category

Salary and allowances ( 5 )

IA Details

Application(s) Number

Party

Date of Filing

Next / Disposal Date

IA Status

IA/2/2006 ( 76919/2006 ) Classification: Stay Application Bench: 1007

RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

10-04-2006

Pending

IA/3/2006 ( 222357/2006 ) Classification: Listing Application Bench: 5127

RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

17-10-2006

19-10-2006

Disposed

IA/1/2006 ( 265508/2007 ) Classification: Listing Application Bench: 1007

RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

06-11-2007

Pending

IA/4/2018 Classification: Suppl. Counter Affidavit Bench: 4783

RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

03-11-2018

13-11-2018

Pending

Last Listing Detail

Cause List Type

Hon’ble Mr./Ms./Dr. Justice

Last Listing Date

Stage of Listing

Last Short Order

Daily Cause List

SUNEET KUMAR ( Bench: 5038 )

17-04-2019

For Admission

PREMPTORILY

Disclaimer: This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding the status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD(Judicial)(Computer).

Posted from <http://allahabadhighcourt.in/apps/status/index.php/case-number>

                  This is a humble request of your appellant to you Honble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your appellant shall ever pray you, Honble Sir.                                                                             

  Date-21-01-2020                           Yours sincerely

                                        Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,   Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

3 comments on If Govt can’t redress the grievance of its citizens, then it must return back to forwarding body

  1. How the case is dismissed if it is not disposed on the merit which is quite obvious from the status of the case and most relevant question is that if the matter is not concerned with the district Inspector of school Mirzapur, how can he redress the grievance arbitrarily instead of providing its viewpoint only that matter does not come under the purview of D.I.O.S.

  2. If the applicant is seeking permission in order to argue in the case then how can DIOS that is district Inspector of school may be instrumental in those things not concerned with him and how the lacuna on the part of High Court of judicature will be overcome by the district Inspector of school Mirzapur. Undoubtedly accountable public functionaries of the Government of Uttar Pradesh are playing game with aggrieved applicant such practice cannot be justified and cannot be fair and such governance cannot be a good governance so action must be taken against the wrongdoers and there must be a fair proceeding in the matter and apex court of India must take action in this matter show that travesty of justice may be avoided.

  3. Undoubtedly true That our grievances are not being are redressed by the concerned public functionaries in correct style. Why not concerned following the setup norms and procrastinating on the submitted grievances? Which is not justified in accordance with the law of land. Grievance redressal is the one of the excellent characteristics of the good governance but it seems that our public functionaries have forgotten their duties thanks

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: