If feedback of a public authority is not relevant, then whether such information is admissible in any court of law

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
first appeal -rbind/r/2018/54799 dear sir rbi cpio have different information for Public and its(rbi) organisation(Bojaipur and rd jaipur and cepc Jaipur agree with your information)??please check and revert back so i can appeal against your information.
1 message
AJAY SINGH <kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com> 26 November 2018 at 08:57
To: cpiorbi@rbi.org.in, pramod.pradhan@rbi.org.in, cepcmumbai@rbi.org.in, cepcjaipur@rbi.org.in, governor@rbi.org.in, bojaipur@rbi.org.in, bobengaluru@rbi.org.in, secy-cic@gov.in, rdjaipur@rbi.org.in, aaria@rbi.org.in, kl.das@nic.in, yogimpsingh@gmail.com, malasharma@rbi.org.in, 17akbarroad@gmail.com
Maanyawar kuch samjah nahi aaye to call kar lijiyega(my mob no is 9950321327 as per
regional director call record ki jaati hain.)
Respected sir,

As per sebi and rbi officials and income tax department your information is not uniform
and its completely fake.because it is disputed so its not uniform.

matter of public interest.Fraud in Digital banking and Matter of suicide of a icici bank
broker(icici brokerage) broker .

Please accept my appeal against your rti information.i accept your rti information.but
rbi governor and his office is not agrre with the yourinfromation.Even you ex employee
ramalingam(current wtm in sebi) who is posted In rbi.

(1)We are also approaching to rbi as information provided by rbi bank.and finance ministry
official Mr gulab singh also drop so many emails in the same context.

(2)So i am sorry as per Rbi Bo,cepc and regional directors your information is wrong.I
attached the Supported documents.You can read them properly.

(3)mails by pramod pradhan is deleted so how forwarded to departments??Mr pramod pradhan
is itself not agreed to your rti.Please check information about
icicipd dealership,icici brokerage and icici securities.
(4)your rbi governor information about fraud is also seems fake and wrong-your rti and
action of your bo and cepc and Governor office action on icicibank is zero till date.

Maanyawar aapke liye contents attach kar diye hain.

aap kripya icicipdealership ka name change kaise hua icici securities bataye??bina rbi ki
information ke??
and on what ground your cpecjaipur and rd jaipur and bo jaipur saying icici brokerage as
icici securities??

(5) as per your regional director call record ki jaati hain?fir wo data kaha gaya?
(6) 3yrs or more old mail read by aaria in 2018.i can submit proof.
(7)pramod pradhan and cepcjaipur deleting mails-i can submit proof.
(8)your bo jaipur and bobengaluru not provide any chance to complainant i can prove.

(9) we also move to pgportal as you gave infromation in rti but Mr sv patil or cepc
mumbai gave wrong infromation about companies in pgportal.
(10)i also approached your officer mr hari prasad patnain and inform same information he
denied to take any action.

Agar aapke samajh nahi aaya aap call kar lete.pehle bhi cpio ke dwara call kar ke rti ke
baare main poocha gaya hain.
regards,
Ajay Kumar Singh

AjayKumarSingh.
kumarajaysingh@yahoo.com,kumarajaysingh@rediffmail.com
3rd floor,358,Shantinagar,durgapura railway Station,Jaipur,302018
Mob No 9950321327


4 attachments
jpg2pdf.pdf
765K
ICICI_Securities_Primary_Dealership_Limited.pdf
113K
ICICI_Pru_IntervalFund-II-Quarterly-Plan_F_OD.pdf
821K
ReplyDocument_7_.pdf
782K
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

How the inconsistent information can be made available under Right to Information Act 2005 if inconsistent information is not admissible in any court of law as integrity of such information is under cloud.
Please accept my appeal against your rti information.i accept your rti information.but
rbi governor and his office is not agrre with the yourinfromation.Even you ex employee
ramalingam(current wtm in sebi) who is posted In rbi.

Preeti Singh
1 year ago

Undoubtedly such information is not admissible under the law but think about the courts and offices where corruption is rampant. It is quite acceptable practice in this largest democracy in the world is that three organs of the government move in coordination to each other.They cooperate each other in shielding the wrongdoings of each other.

Arun Pratap Singh
1 year ago

I am watching there is ample evidence of wrongdoings but no accountable public functionaries are taking it seriously that is why no one is ordering enquiry in the such serious allegation of corruption.Those are most sinner who are given obligation to serve the people but they are breaching the trust by looting the people.