If everyone is alike before law, then D.M. Mirzapur is also wrongdoer as supported wrongdeeds of BDO

आवेदन का विवरण
शिकायत संख्या
60000180108592
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
Yogi M P Singh
आवेदक कर्ता का मोबाइल न०:
7379105911,
विषय:
Whether D. M. Mirzapur can tell the mechanism to cancel the report made under the Panchayat Raj Act. Whether the mechanism followed by him if not, why not he be subjected to penal proceedings under the law of land as no one can take the law of land under teeth as done by him. Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2018/05077 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 29/05/2018 Received By Ministry/Department Uttar Pradesh D.P.R.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C. Whether it is not a mockery of law of land that the enquiry under challenge was made ground to dispose of the grievance. The bogus enquiry made by the wrongdoers in order to shield themselves upheld by the D.M. Mirzapur itself which is a mockery of law of land and creating insecurity in the mind of the citizenry and credibility of institutions have reached the nadir in the eye of common citizenry. It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that deputy commissioner work and employment had also been granted the charge of B.D.O. Chhanbey arbitrarily carried out enquiry through its subordinates in order to shield its corrupt coterie. In order to shield its skin this deputy commissioner and working B.D.O. Chhanbey Sushil Tripathi made the mockery of the panchayat Raj ACT and ordered enquiry and superseded enquiry made by the joint team of senior rank officers Deputy Commissioner MGNREGA and 2-Project Director Mirzapur carried out under panchayat raj act. Please take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
नियत तिथि:
प्रक्रिया में है
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
फीडबैक की स्थिति:
आवेदन का संलग्नक

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
PLEASE direct concerned to pursue the law of land instead of making mockery of it.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 7 September 2018 at 22:46

To: supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>
Cc: urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>
Bcc: cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, csup@up.nic.in

To 
                                                     Hon’ble chief justice of India 

                                                      New Delhi, India
Subject- Bogus enquiry made by the wrongdoers in order to shield themselves upheld by the D.M. Mirzapur itself which is a mockery of law of land and creating insecurity in the mind of the citizenry and credibility of institutions have reached the nadir.
With due respect, your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of following enquiry report which was challenged by your applicant-

 
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that on the ground of aforementioned report, recovery order of Rs.1 Lakh 5 thousand approximate and others made to the wrongdoers including panchayat secretary Jitendra Singh who is one of the team members of the aforementioned team has been waved off. Recovery order was proposed by the joint team of two district-level officers 1-Enquiry officer nominated by the D. M. Mirzapur i.e. Deputy Commissioner MGNREGA and 2-Project Director Mirzapur.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that deputy commissioner work and employment had also been granted the charge of B.D.O. Chhanbey arbitrarily carried out enquiry through its subordinates in order to shield its corrupt coterie. In order to shield its skin this deputy commissioner and working B.D.O. Chhanbey made the mockery of the panchayat Raj ACT and ordered enquiry and superseded enquiry made by the senior rank officers Deputy Commissioner MGNREGA and 2-Project Director Mirzapur carried out under panchayat raj act. 
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir please take a glance at the following grievance submitted by the applicant on the public grievance portal of government of India.
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2018/05077
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt-29/05/2018
Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
D.P.R.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C.
Grievance Document
Current Status-Case closed
Date of Action-31/08/2018
Remarks
&#x0D; &#x0D; ,&#x0D; &#x0D; ,ok&#x0D; ,&#x0D; shikayt krta dwara purv mai shikayt kiya gya tha jiski janch diya gya hai
Reply Document, Officer Concerns To
Officer Name-Shri Kalyan Banerji, Officer Designation-Under Secretary
Contact Address-Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address, Contact Number-05222215127
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that how the principle of natural justice allow a junior officer to order an enquiry against the proposed recovery order made by the senior rank officers and most surprising that genuine enquiry under panchayat raj act was nullified by the team of subordinates of block development officer Chhanbey.
6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that when your applicant challenged the validity of the aforementioned Bogus report, then how D.M. Mirzapur can take the recourse of the aforementioned report to close the grievance? Whether it is not a reflection of rampant corruption that the act made the mockery of the law of land was made ground to close the case without attending in a genuine way. Please take a glance of attached documents submitted with the grievance in order to seek justice from the chief minister office government of Uttar Pradesh.  
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely
Date-07-09-2018              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

[Quoted text hidden]


3 attachments
img076.jpg
2108K
img077.jpg
2292K
grievanceDocument.pdf
2646K
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

Whether D. M. Mirzapur can tell the mechanism to cancel the report made under the Panchayat Raj Act. Whether the mechanism followed by him if not, why not he be subjected to penal proceedings under the law of land as no one can take the law of land under teeth as done by him. Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2018/05077 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 29/05/2018 Received By Ministry/Department Uttar Pradesh D.P.R.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C. Whether it is not a mockery of law of land that the enquiry under challenge was made ground to dispose of the grievance.

Preeti Singh
2 years ago

Think about the gravity of situation that no action is taken on the grievances of prime minister office reference is not reflection of anarchy. Why U. P. C. M. is not grateful to prime minister is surprising.
नियत तिथि: प्रक्रिया में है शिकायत की स्थिति: लम्बित रिमाइंडर : फीडबैक :
फीडबैक की स्थिति: आवेदन का संलग्नक संलग्नक देखें

Arun Pratap Singh
2 years ago

Undoubtedly it is quite true that junior can't interfere with the working of seniors in order to supersede the order and report passed by them but in this anarchy and lawlessness every thing is feasible.
Hon'ble Sir that how the principle of natural justice allow a junior officer to order an enquiry against the proposed recovery order made by the senior rank officers and most surprising that genuine enquiry under panchayat raj act was nullified by the team of subordinates of block development officer Chhanbey.