I think that government of Uttar Pradesh now fit to be imposed Article 356 as law order is completely failed

Article 356 of the Constitution confers a power upon the President to be exercised only where he is satisfied that a situation has arisen where the government of a State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.

 

Gmail Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
There is complete constitutional crisis in the state of Uttar Pradesh and constitutional functionaries have been made teeth less by overlooking their orders.
1 message
Yogi M. P. Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com> Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:26 PM
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, “presidentofindia@rb.nic.in” <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, “cmup@up.nic.in” <cmup@up.nic.in>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, “csup@up.nic.in” <csup@up.nic.in>, “uphrclko@yahoo.co.in” <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, “sec.sic@up.nic.in” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>
 Now a days instead of redressing the grievances of the citizenry, e-mail of public spirited persons are spammed by the accountable public functionaries in the state of Uttar Pradesh as well as in PMO.

सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम २००५ की धारा २० के आधीन अधिरोपित ऐसी शास्तियों का विवरण जिनकी वसूली नही हुई है -वर्ष २०१७ में अधिरोपित शास्ति का विवरण

 

वर्ष २०१७ में अधिरोपित कुल शास्ति संख्या ७०९ है | विस्तृत विवरण के लिए संलग्नको का अवलोकन करे |

Merely in the year 2017, Honourable commission imposed 709 pecuniary penalties and concerned district Magistrate were directed to recover the imposed penalties but the government of Bhartiya Janata Party did not recover the imposed penalties as it has no regard for the rule of law. Only those personnel are posted at the post of district magistrate who are really incompetent for the post and blindly follows the dictates of local political masters without thinking the pros and cons.

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.

2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following information sought by the applicant as follows but not provided by the concerned.

On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 14:45, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh submitted written representation before district magistrate Mirzapur regarding recovery of penalties imposed on four district level officers who made the mockery of the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005. Hundreds of representations submitted later on by the information seeker but cryptic reply were provided on the part of District Magistrate Mirzapur. Whether it is not a reflection of the deep-rooted corruption in the system where compliance of orders of constitutional functionaries is not made. Vide attached document for detail. PIO may provide access to information concerning the recovery of the penalty imposed by SIC Uttar Pradesh 4 PIOs.

1-Copy of Treasury Challan made in the four cases.

2-Name of the PIO, still not paid the imposed penalty with detail of cause, not complying order of SIC.

3-Reason of failure of D. M. Mirzapur in ensuring compliance of SIC orders attached to communiqué.

3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that hundreds of communications exchanged from the accountable public functionaries but no recovery is being made by the concerned accountable public functionaries and R.T.I. Communiques in the state is not cultivating any fruit as it/ Right to Information Act 2005 has been thrown by the state government into the heap of garbage.

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |

इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-06/08/2020           Yours sincerely

Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

 

 

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

2 attachments
Gmail – Whether it is not obligation of D.M. Mirzapur to ensure recovery of imposed penalties on erring public information officers by state information commission_.pdf
3714K
Penalty_From January-2017-to-December-2017.pdf
482K

5 comments on I think that government of Uttar Pradesh now fit to be imposed Article 356 as law order is completely failed

  1. If the President is satisfied that such a situation has
    arisen, whether on the basis of a report received from the Governor of the State or otherwise, he may, by
    proclamation, take any or all of the three steps mentioned in sub-clauses (a), (b) and (c). It would be
    appropriate to read the entire clause (1) of article 356 at this stage:

  2. Whether it is not the reflection of lawlessness and Anarchy in the state. State information commission of Uttar Pradesh punished more than 700 Public Information officers under section 20 of The Right to Information act 2005 and these penalties were not recovered by the government of Uttar Pradesh headed by Yogi Adityanath sir who is falsely claiming to provide good governance while the fact is he is providing anarchy to the people of state. It is most surprising that these facts are the reflection of law order failure in the state of Uttar Pradesh but it is unfortunate that neither apex court of India nor accountable public functionaries in the state as well as in the centre are understanding the fact of the case.

  3. सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम २००५ की धारा २० के आधीन अधिरोपित ऐसी शास्तियों का विवरण जिनकी वसूली नही हुई है -वर्ष २०१७ में अधिरोपित शास्ति का विवरण
    वर्ष २०१७ में अधिरोपित कुल शास्ति संख्या ७०९ है | विस्तृत विवरण के लिए संलग्नको का अवलोकन करे |
    This implies that there is sheer failure of the law order machinery in the state. Think about the gravity of the situation that not a single imposed penalty is being recovered from the erring public information officer.

  4. Merely in the year 2017, Honourable commission imposed 709 pecuniary penalties and concerned district Magistrate were directed to recover the imposed penalties but the government of Bhartiya Janata Party did not recover the imposed penalties as it has no regard for the rule of law. Only those personnel are posted at the post of district magistrate who are really incompetent for the post and blindly follows the dictates of local political masters without thinking the pros and cons.

  5. वर्ष २०१७ में अधिरोपित कुल शास्ति संख्या ७०९ है | विस्तृत विवरण के लिए संलग्नको का अवलोकन करे |
    Where the Central Information Commission or the State Information Commission, as the case may be, at the time of deciding any complaint or appeal is of the opinion that the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, has, without any reasonable cause, refused to receive an application for information or has not furnished information within the time specified under sub‑section (1) of section 7 or malafidely denied the request for information or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or misleading information or destroyed information which was the subject of the request or obstructed in any manner in furnishing the information, it shall impose a penalty of two hundred and fifty rupees each day till application is received or information is furnished, so however, the total amount of such penalty shall not exceed twenty‑five thousand rupees:

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: