How much surprising that matter not concerned with technical education but its PIO took Rs.45 to provide information

आवेदन का विवरण
शिकायत संख्या
40015716003627
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
Yogi M P Singh
विषय:
This application is under article 51 of
constitution of IndiaAgain you Honble Sir have not sent the OTP Pass word
Whether it is justified Matter is serious as concerned with career of your
applicant if not redressed ,then future will be ruined Sir fixed date 27-April-2016
to resolve the grievance passed and today is 09May2016 but grievance of your
applicant remained as such If suppose that one of your kith and kin may
remain in trouble ,then same lackadaisical approach will be adopted by you
Honble Sir With due respect your applicantpetitioner wants to draw the kind
attention of the Honble Sir to the following submissions as follows 1-It is
submitted before the Honble Sir that redressal of this grievance will decide
the future of your applicant
आवेदन काविवरण शिकायतसंख्या 40015716002166
आवेदककर्ता कानाम Deepak Kumar Dubey2-It is submitted
before the Honble Sir that you Honble Sir is God of your applicant and please
help your applicant as your applicant is going in depression because of undue
delay in providing the sought information Since the copy was checked
negligently so concerned PIO after taking the estimated amount again from
your applicant didnt provide the sought information 3-It is submitted before
the Honble Sir that your applicant have never seen God but my God is the
person who may be instrumental in seeking justice from the system as this
injustice is so giant demon that it will annihilate entire career of your
applicant This is humble request of your applicant to you Honble Sir to pass
appropriate direction so that future of your applicant may be avoided to be
ruined For this your applicant shall ever pray you Honble Sir Yours sincerely
Deepak Kumar Dubey Fathers name-Mr Nagendra Prasad Dubey Village-Mujeharaa
Post-Mujeharaa District-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh Pin code-231312
नियत तिथि:
01 – Jul – 2016
शिकायत की स्थिति:
निस्तारित
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ का प्रकार
आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश दिनांक
अधिकारी को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या दिनांक
आख्या
नियत दिनांक
स्थिति
आख्या रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन
सन्दर्भ
16
– Jun – 2016
प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव प्राविधिक शिक्षा
25
– Jun – 2016
प्रकरण
प्राविधिक शिक्षा परिषद् लखनऊ से सम्बंधित नहीं
निस्तारित
आवेदन का विवरण
शिकायत संख्या
40015716002166
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
Deepak Kumar Dubey
विषय:
An application under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to
Information Act 2005 12 April 2016 1817 To First appellate authority Board of
technical education Government of Uttar Pradesh Lucknow ,Uttar Pradesh
Appellant-Deepak Kumar Dubey Fathers name-Mr Nagendra Prasad Dubey
Village-Mujeharaa Post-Mujeharaa District-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh Pin
code-231312 Respondent-Public Information Officer VP Saaraswat Board of
Technical Education Government of Uttar Pradesh Lucknow ,Uttar Pradesh
Prayer-No information was made available by the aforesaid public information
officer even after payment of additional Rs45 to him as sought by him from
your appellant Please direct him to provide your appellant sought information
and may take action against him as he violated the provision subsection 1 of
section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005 With due respect your applicant
wants to draw the kind attention of the Honble Sir to the following
submissions as follows 1-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that your
appellant sought information under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to
Information Act 2005 through RTI communique 11012016 which was replied by
aforesaid PIO through letter dated 29012016 by seeking Rs44 00 additional RTI
Fee in order to provide sought information as sought by your appellant Please
take a glance of attached document with this representation 2-It is submitted
before the Honble Sir that your appellant responded the communication of
aforesaid PIO on 09022016 through registered post along with the postal
orders as sought by PIO Honble Sir may be pleased take the perusal of
attached PDF documents with this representation 3-It is submitted before the
Honble Sir that the act of PIO is tantamount t
नियत तिथि:
27 – Apr – 2016
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ का प्रकार
आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश दिनांक
अधिकारी को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या दिनांक
आख्या
नियत दिनांक
स्थिति
आख्या रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ
12 – Apr – 2016
प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव प्राविधिक शिक्षा
अधीनस्थ को प्रेषित
2
अंतरित
प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव (प्राविधिक शिक्षा )
20
– Apr – 2016
सचिव प्राविधिक शिक्षा परिषद्
नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें 
लंबित

3 comments on How much surprising that matter not concerned with technical education but its PIO took Rs.45 to provide information

  1. It is submitted before the Honble Sir that your appellant sought information under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 through RTI communique 11012016 which was replied by aforesaid PIO through letter dated 29012016 by seeking Rs44 00 additional RTI Fee in order to provide sought information as sought by your appellant

  2. आवेदन का विवरण
    शिकायत संख्या 40015716002166
    आवेदक कर्ता का नाम: Deepak Kumar Dubey
    विषय: An application under subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 12 April 2016 1817 To First appellate authority Board of technical education Government of Uttar Pradesh Lucknow ,Uttar Pradesh Appellant-Deepak Kumar Dubey Fathers name-Mr Nagendra Prasad Dubey Village-Mujeharaa Post-Mujeharaa District-Mirzapur State-Uttar Pradesh Pin code-231312 Respondent-Public Information Officer VP Saaraswat Board of Technical Education Government of Uttar Pradesh Lucknow ,Uttar Pradesh Prayer-No information was made available by the aforesaid public information officer even after payment of additional Rs45 to him as sought by him from your appellant Please direct him to provide your appellant sought information and may take action against him as he violated the provision subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005 With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Honble Sir to the following submissions as follows 1-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that your appellant sought information under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 through RTI communique 11012016 which was replied by aforesaid PIO through letter dated 29012016 by seeking Rs44 00 additional RTI Fee in order to provide sought information as sought by your appellant Please take a glance of attached document with this representation 2-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that your appellant responded the communication of aforesaid PIO on 09022016 through registered post along with the postal orders as sought by PIO Honble Sir may be pleased take the perusal of attached PDF documents with this representation 3-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that the act of PIO is tantamount t
    नियत तिथि: 27 – Apr – 2016
    शिकायत की स्थिति: लम्बित
    अग्रसारित विवरण-
    क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश आख्या दिनांक आख्या नियत दिनांक स्थिति आख्या रिपोर्ट
    1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 12 – Apr – 2016 प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव -प्राविधिक शिक्षा — अधीनस्थ को प्रेषित
    2 अंतरित प्रमुख सचिव/सचिव (प्राविधिक शिक्षा ) 20 – Apr – 2016 सचिव -प्राविधिक शिक्षा परिषद् नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें लंबित

  3. Here this question arises that when concerned had not to provide sought information, then why public information officer sought additional rupees45 from information seeker.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: