2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 8-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that from the attachment it is obvious from points 15that aggrieved petitioner took the shelter fourth time in the High court at Allahabad and filed petition against the impugned order dated 1.2.2006 issued by director education (arth) Allahabad and Hon’ble High court passed the in writ no.20121/06 on 13.4.2006 that apparently the director education (arth) Allahabad through its order dated 1.2.2006 took under teeth the direction of High court ……. so counter affidavit may be submitted within ….. but counter affidavit was submitted by DIOS Mirzapur not by three others. More surprising is that director education (arth) Allahabad itself didn’t submit counter affidavit.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that When petitioner challenged the legality of impugnedorder of dismissal dated 1.8.90 , then court had jurisdiction only to check whether the impugned order of dismissal is in accordance with the law or not .But court passed the order as follows-Hon’ble court said as- “Accordingly,the impugned order of dismissal dated 1.8.90 is quashed. The petitioner shall be reinstated in the service forthwith and will be entitled to all the consequential benefits . However , he will be entitled to only 50% of emoluments of salary for the period of litigation up to the final order of this court.” Here this question arises that why Hon’ble court deprived the petitioner from 50% emoluments of salary without giving him proper opportunity to be heard as the order passed by court is arbitrary. Prayer was not made to provide 50% emoluments of salary. Petitioner still didn’t know why he was deprived from salary i.e. from legitimate fundamental right (Right to livelihood). Whether Right to justice is fundamental right is really available to citizens.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that five petitions have been filed in the High Court but no justice could be delivered by High court because of its cryptic orders which pave the way to bureaucrats to find loopholes in the order even when apex court has ordered in its various judgements that transparency and accountability is the integral part of sound judicial system. Please direct the concerned to take appropriate steps in accordance with the law so that CPIO High court may provide the sought information to your applicant. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir . Yours sincerely
Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road , District-Mirzapur ,State-Uttar Pradesh , India