How can staffs of the face book delete the posts of face book account holders arbitrarily?

How can face book staffs delete posts of the face book account holders arbitrarily if vested with such 
 powers then for any illegal post, staffs of the face book will be accountable in accordance with the law instead of face book account holders.  

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether it is justified to delete the post arbitrarily shared by the applicant from his blogs https://www.yogi.systems ?
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 28 October 2019 at 16:14
To: zuck@facebook.com, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>

Most revered Sir/Madam –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir/Madam, with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement


.2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that it is the principle of natural justice that if any action is taken against any body, then he is provided opportunity to be heard but face book India deleted the entire posts of the applicant from his timeline. At least they had to inform me and had to provide me time that because of this reason such and such, I would like to delete the post on date and so on. But the face book India did not do so which is ultravires to constitution of India. 

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that undoubtedly face book is not the public property but if it is carrying out its business in this country and it has to follow the some standard set up norms as regulations of this country but it seems that staffs of the face book do not follow the framework of constitution instead prefers arbitrary actions full of tyranny. If it is not true then concerned staffs of the face book may explain when did they inform me that they will delete the entire posts from the timeline  of the face book of the applicant as aforementioned and did they provide the reason to do so? 
  4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following is the email sent by the aggrieved Mr Sudalai Kumar who wanted to share the link from my blog to the time line of his face book account but he was not allowed to do so. Whether the menu of the face book account holders will be decided by the face book  staffs as being done?
Sudalai Kumar <ss.kumar1987@gmail.com> 18 October 2019 at 22:56
To: Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>, Bala <balasubramanian.energyaudit@gmail.com>, records@facebook.com
For example.



I want to share it and it is not allowing me to do it fb. Snapshot of the issue is attached for your perusal 
 Government is making efforts to suppress the voice of a whistle blowers, whether it is justified?

Freedom of Speech and expression means the right to express one’s own convictions and opinions freely by words of mouth, writing, printing, pictures or any other mode. It thus includes the expression of one’s idea through any communicable medium or visible representation, such as gesture, signs, and the like.

  5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether the post made by the Face book account holders is the intellectual property of face book account holders or face book proprietor undoubtedly it is matter of great concern after the arbitrary deletion of the posts made on the timeline by the applicant from his blogs. Now it has been evident that all those cases slapped on the offenders because of their illegal activities on the face book must be slapped on the staffs of the face book India. As the master entire materials available on the site of face book belongs to proprietor of face book. 

                                      This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

3 comments on How can staffs of the face book delete the posts of face book account holders arbitrarily?

  1. Whether the post made by the Face book account holders is the intellectual property of face book account holders or face book proprietor undoubtedly it is matter of great concern after the arbitrary deletion of the posts made on the timeline by the applicant from his blogs. Now it has been evident that all those cases slapped on the offenders because of their illegal activities on the face book must be slapped on the staffs of the face book India. As the master entire materials available on the site of face book belongs to proprietor of face book.

  2. How the Facebook India can delete the genuine post of an anti-corruption crusader which are based on documentary evidences?
    How can face book staffs delete posts of the face book account holders arbitrarily if vested with such
    powers then for any illegal post, staffs of the face book will be accountable in accordance with the law instead of face book account holders.

  3. Think about the gravity of situation that a whistleblower is being targeted by the senior rank corrupt staff after government of Tamilnadu was raising the matter concerned with the deep rooted corruption and this act of the whistleblower was exposing them in order to suppress the voice of whistleblower they made an attempt to suspend the whistleblower from the service which is not only unconstitutional but an attempt to suppress the voice of the whistleblower which is showing that our government both Central and state government is not capable to protect the whistleblower which is too much insulting in this largest democracy in the world so it is the need of the Hour that we may elect honest representatives so that our government may be transparent and accountable and our government functionaries may work under the honest member of parliaments which is essential for a healthy democracy but it seems that these government functionaries have made the people like us too much vulnerable.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: