How can Deputy Registrar central registry return the second appeal in order to seek the copy of reply?

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
How can Deputy Registrar central registry return the second appeal in order to seek the copy of the reply of CPIO and FAA when no such communications were made with the information seeker?
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 14 February 2018 at 01:10
To: Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>, registrar-cic@nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>

To
                                  Chief Information Commissioner of India
                                The Central Information Commission,
                                                       August Kranti Bhawan,
                                                               Bhikaji Cama Place,
                                                          New Delhi – 110066
An application under article 51 A of the constitution of India seeking the attention of the accountable public functionaries of the government of India.
Subject-Deputy Registrar central registry of central information commission returned the second appeal of Ekta Singh aggrieved lady sought information under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 on the flimsy ground as follows.
The ground of rejection -1-Copy of R.T.I. Application submitting to CPIO is not enclosed.
2-Copy of reply if received any from the CPIO, is not enclosed.
3-Copy of reply if received any from the FAA, is not enclosed.
Here the role of Deputy Registrar central registry is sheer negative and unproductive as well as causing great damage to the spirit of the august act.
Reply of the applicant is as follows-
1-Since the RTI Application submitted online ipso facto obvious from the registration numbers of the application and the appeal, and online portal allow application in PDF form attached to the application so entire records available to the applicant was attached to the second appeal submitted online under subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Information sought was attached to the second appeal as supportive document and Deputy Registrar without thoroughly examining the submitted document reached on the wrong conclusion which is the reflection of his insolence and dereliction to the public duty.
2-When no reply was made by CPIO, then how the copy of the reply, may be submitted by the appellant?
3-When no reply was made by FAA, then how the copy of the reply, may be submitted by the appellant?
The act of Deputy Registrar central registry is ultra vires to Right to Information Act 2005 as he is forcibly seeking those copies which were not exchanged by the CPIO and FAA with the information seeker.
With due respect, applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that matter is concerned with the communication dated 30-Jan-2018,
Return of your Second Appeal/Complaint for removal of deficiencies.
 Central Information Commission (CIC) no-reply@nic.in via nic.in
30 Jan
to me
Dear Madam/Sir,
Your request details are given below:
1              Appellant Name               Ekta Singh
2              Address Village-Patevar, Village Panchayat-Patevar, Block-Pateharaa, Police station – Marihan, District-Mirzapur, Post office-Marihan
3              Diary Number   610514
4              Diary Date           24-01-2018
5              Letter Date         01-01-1970
Your Dak (Diary No. 610514) has been returned vide Facilitation Memo date 30/01/2018. Please click here to view Facilitation Memo.
Regards,
Central Information Commission (CIC)
2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance at communication exchanged between aggrieved lady Ekta Singh and deputy registrar

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon‘ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance at the attached document with the representation.  
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land. This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                                   Yours sincerely
                                              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District- Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.


5 attachments
Aadhaar card.pdf
147K
First appeal of Ekta Singh.pdf
351K
RTI Application Ekta Singh .pdf
445K
Second appeal of Ekta Singh.pdf
422K
Supportive documents Ekta Singh.pdf
401K
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh

Since the RTI Application submitted online ipso facto obvious from the registration numbers of the application and the appeal, and online portal allow application in PDF form attached to the application so entire records available to the applicant was attached to the second appeal submitted online under subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Information sought was attached to the second appeal as supportive document and Deputy Registrar without thoroughly examining the submitted document reached on the wrong conclusion which is the reflection of his insolence and dereliction to the public duty.

Preeti Singh
2 years ago

2-When no reply was made by CPIO, then how the copy of the reply, may be submitted by the appellant?
3-When no reply was made by FAA, then how the copy of the reply, may be submitted by the appellant?
Whether aforementioned Deputy registrar concerned is not playing the cryptic role?