Honesty is not to say but it reflects in the working of an Honest man.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh
 <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Whether it is justified to shield wrongdoers by the D.P.R.O. Mirzapur. Honesty is not to say but it reflects in the working of an Honest man. Whether any one is honest if yes ,then why not reached my grievance to that great man?
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 10 July 2017 at 02:19
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>,
 supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, “csup@up.nic.in”
<csup@up.nic.in>, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com
शिकायत संख्या
15199160160090
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
महेश प्रताप सिंह
How much surprising that wrongdoers are being shielded under
the nose of accountable public functionaries

​ ?​
Subject-Communication dated-03-05-2017 addressed to your
applicant is sheer
 illegal ,unjustified ,unconstitutional ,mockery of law of land and ultravires to
 constitution if accepted will only promote lawlessness and anarchy in the system
and will set up bad precedent for future generation. 
With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites the kind
attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is
itself a wrongdoer and shielding the wrongdoers indulged in siphoning
the public fund. Hon’ble Sir please take a glance of first second and
third page of attached documents which are reports of joint team of
E.Os. nominated by District Magistrate Mirzapur i.e. district level
officers Deputy commissioner MGNREGA and Project director. They
have evidently recommended Rs. 1  Lakh 1 thousand and 6 hundred 15 .   
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that aforementioned
recommendation was made on 28-July-2015 .
 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under point 3 in the
enquiry report ,it has been mentioned that complaint regarding the
plantation and pond couldn’t be looked into because concerned didn’t
provide the records so enquiry couldn’t be carried out consequently
sector officer be sent by B.D.O. to carry out enquiry on the ground of
merit and defect and then higher authorities be informed about the report. 
 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that page four is the communication
dated-03-05-2017 and page 5 is enquiry report carried out by wrongdoers
themselves who are proved guilty in the report of team nominated by District
Magistrate Mirzapur as aforementioned. 
 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that think about the time gap between 
28-July-2015 and 03-05-2017 i.e. time gap of one year nine month and five days.
Even layman can know the motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur and his working style from
existing circumstancial evidences. 
 6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant motive was to

implement the recommendation of enquiry officer nominated by district

magistrate  through enquiry so that public exchequer be benefited but

motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is ipso facto obvious that he wanted to

shield his wrongdoer companions and he succeeded to achieve its ulterior motives. 
 7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 

119. The Apex Court held that if the basic order stands vitiated, the consequential order automatically falls.” 

In another case of Chunmun Vs. District Magistrate, Sonbhadra and others; 1998 (89) Revenue Digest 771, this Court has

clearly held that the cessation of the financial and administrative powers of a Pradhan on the basis of report submitted by

an officer/public servant who is not defined as an Enquiry Officer under Rule 2(c) cannot be the basis for exercise of

power under Rule 5. 

Reliance has been placed by Sri Hemant Kumar Misra, learned Counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 7 on a

Single Judge decision of this Court in the case of Smt. Malti Devi Vs. State of U.P. and others; 2008 (1) CRC 714.

This case Smt. Malti Devi (Supra) is of no avail and is of no relevance at all in as much as that in this case the

District Magistrate had appointed the District Basic Education Officer to hold a preliminary enquiry and undisputedly,

District Basic Education Officer is a District level officer and, therefore, being a district level officer and having been

nominated by the District Magistrate for holding the preliminary enquiry fully fall within the meaning of Enquiry Officer as

defined under Rule 2(c) of the Enquiry Rules. In the case in hand there was no appointment of the Enquiry Officer by the

District Magistrate and two members of the Enquiry Committee appointed by the Chief Development Officer who is not competent to

appoint Enquiry Officer under 1997 Enquiry Rules, could not at all act as Enquiry Officer and any report with their participation in the

Enquiry could not be taken as an Enquiry Report under Rule 4. Therefore, the case of Smt. Malti Devi (Supra) had no relevance or any

bearing at all so far as the present case is concerned. 
Whether staffs of B.D.O. who are itself proved guilty in the enquiry report carried out

under Panchaayti Raj Act can supersede the enquiry report by misinterpreting earlier report.

Whether D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is a layman who is not apprised with the fact that principal of

natural justice never allowes a wrongdoer to carry out enquiry in order to prove itself innocent.

Undoubtedly D.P.R.O. Mirzapur set wrongdoers scot free by making the mockery of law of land.

Undoubtedly D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is guilty of misinterpreting the enquiry report through wrongdoer

subordinates of B.D.O. Chhanbey. 

This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never

be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in

arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement

which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and

depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to

take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your

applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                          Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911

Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur ,

Uttar Pradesh ,India 
Subject –D.P.R.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior

rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467

,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C.
With great respect to revered Sir , your applicant invites the kind attention of

the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.P.R.O Mirzapur

cheated the senior rank officers throughCommunication

dated-03-05-2017  like 1 –District Magistrate

Mirzapur 2-Commissioner ,rural development,

Uttar Pradesh 3-Secretary, office of Hon’ble

chief minister, government of Uttar Pradesh and

also your applicant.  Hon’ble Sir, please take a glance

of attached documents with this representation.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Section 465 in The

Indian Penal Code
465. Punishment for forgery.—Whoever commits forgery shall be

punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which

may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Section 466 in

The Indian Penal Code 466. Forgery of record of Court or of public

register, etc.—1[Whoever forges a document or an electronic record],

purporting to be a record or proceed­ing of or in a Court of Justice, or

a register of birth, baptism, marriage or burial, or a register kept by

a public servant as such, or a certificate or document purporting to be

made by a public servant in his official capacity, or an authority to

institute or defend a suit, or to take any proceedings therein, or to

confess judgment, or a power of attorney, shall be punished with

imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to

seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. 1[Explanation.—For the

purposes of this section, “register” includes any list, data or record of

any entries maintained in the electronic form as defined in clause (r) of

sub-section
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that IPC 467: Section

467 of the Indian Penal Code
Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.
Whoever forges a document which purports to be a valuable security or a will, or an authority to

adopt a son, or which purports to give authority to any person to make or transfer any valuable

security, or to receive the principal, interest or dividends thereon, or to receive or deliver any

money, movable property, or valuable security, or any document purporting to be an acquittance

or receipt acknowledging the payment of money, or an acquittance or receipt for the

delivery of any movable property or valuable security, shall be punished with 1 *

imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term

which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that IPC

468: Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code

Forgery for purpose of cheating

Whoever commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for

the purpose of cheating, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description

for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Section 469 in

The Indian Penal Code
469. Forgery for purpose of harming reputation.—Whoever commits forgery,

1[intending that the document or electronic record forged] shall harm the

repu­tation of any party, or knowing that it is likely to be used for that purpose,

shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may

extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.
7-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Section 471 in

The Indian Penal Code
471. Using as genuine a forged 1[document or electronic record].—Whoever

fraudulently or dishonestly uses as genuine any 1[document or electronic

record] which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged 1[document

or electronic record], shall be punished in the same manner as if he had

forged such 1[document or electronic record].
                          This is humble request of your applicant to you

Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the

rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner

by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement

which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of

loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to

justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps

in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your

applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                          Yours sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road

District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India.
आवेदन काविवरण
शिकायतसंख्या
15199160160090
आवेदक कर्ताका नाम:
महेश प्रताप सिंह
आवेदक कर्ताका मोबाइलन०:
7379105911,0
विषय:
direct concerned to purpose the law of land instead of making mockery of it
नियत तिथि:
29 – Jan – 2017
शिकायत कीस्थिति:
निस्तारित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
दिनांक 02/06/2017 को फीडबैक:- How

much surprising that wrongdoers are being shielded

under the nose of accountable public functionaries ​ ?​

Subject-Communication dated-03-05-2017 addressed

to your applicant is sheer illegal ,unjustified ,unconstitutional ,

mockery of law of land and ultravires to constitution if

accepted will only promote lawlessness and anarchy in

the system and will set up bad precedent for future generation.

With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites

the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is itself a

wrongdoer and shielding the wrongdoers indulged in siphoning the public

fund. Hon’ble Sir please take a glance of first second and third page of

attached documents which are reports of joint team of E.Os. nominated by

District Magistrate Mirzapur i.e. district level officers Deputy

commissioner MGNREGA and Project director. They have evidently

recommended Rs. 1 Lakh 1 thousand and 6 hundred 15 . 2-It is

submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that aforementioned recommendation

was made on 28-July-2015 . 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that

under point 3 in the enquiry report ,it has been mentioned that complaint

regarding the plantation and pond couldn’t be looked into because

concerned didn’t provide the records so enquiry couldn’t be carried out consequently sector officer be sent by B.D.O. to carry out enquiry on the

ground of merit and defect and then higher authorities be informed about

the report. 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that page four is the communication dated-03-05-2017 and page 5 is enquiry report carried out

by wrongdoers themselves who are proved guilty in the report of team

nominated by District Magistrate Mirzapur as aforementioned. 5-It is

submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that think about the time gap between

28-July-2015 and 03-05-2017 i.e. time gap of one year nine month and five

days. Even layman can know the motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur and his

working style from existing circumstancial evidences. 6-It is submitted

before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant motive was to implement the recommendation of enquiry officer nominated by district magistrate

through enquiry so that public exchequer be benefitted but motive of

D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is ipso facto obvious that he wanted to shield his

wrongdoer companions and he succeeded to achieve its ulterior motives.
आवेदन का संलग्नक
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ काप्रकार
आदेश देनेवाले अधिकारी
आदेश दिनांक
अधिकारी को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या दिनांक
आख्या
नियत दिनांक
स्थिति
आख्या रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
अमित गुप्ता(सचिवमुख्यमंत्रीकार्यालय )
28 – Dec – 2016
आयुक्त ग्राम्य विकास
पृष्ठांकित
04 – May – 2017
refer to attach letter
निस्तारित
2
अंतरित
आयुक्त(ग्राम्य विकास)
02 – Jan – 2017
जिलाधिकारीमिर्ज़ापुर,
कृपयाजांचोपरांतयथोचितकार्यवाही कियेजाने 
एवं कृतकार्यवाही सेअवगत करानेका कष्ट करें 
04 – May – 2017
refer to attach letter
निस्तारित
3
आख्या
जिलाधिकारी ( )
03 – Jan – 2017
जिला पंचायत राजअधिकारीमिर्ज़ापुर,पंचायतीराज विभाग
आवश्यककार्यवाहीकरने का कष्टकरें
 एवंआख्या प्रेषितकरें refer to attach letter
03 – May – 2017
refer to attach letter
निस्तारित


2 attachments
Recovery recommended by E.O. illegally withheld by DPRO Mirzapur.pdf
615K
Prayer.pdf
3661K

2 comments on Honesty is not to say but it reflects in the working of an Honest man.

  1. How

    much surprising that wrongdoers are being shielded

    under the nose of accountable public functionaries ​ ?​

    Subject-Communication dated-03-05-2017 addressed

    to your applicant is sheer illegal ,unjustified ,unconstitutional ,

    mockery of law of land and ultravires to constitution if

    accepted will only promote lawlessness and anarchy in

    the system and will set up bad precedent for future generation.

  2. Hon’ble Sir that think about the time gap between

    28-July-2015 and 03-05-2017 i.e. time gap of one year nine month and five

    days. Even layman can know the motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur and his

    working style from existing circumstantial evidences.D.P.R.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the senior

    rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467

    ,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: