Your applicant tried 500 times to submit the R.T.I. communique online but website didn’t accept the entries as usual in good governance.
Yogi M. P. Singh
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh<firstname.lastname@example.org>
to pmosb, presidentofind., urgent-action, supremecourt, secy-cic
An application under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005.
06 November 2016
Please provide access to information as sought by your applicant under following points within time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005.
When the CRPF web site charged four times fee from Alok Bhardwaj and two times fee from Mohammed Akaram ,then why concerned refunded only Rs. 300.00 and when Rs.148.00 included Rs.100 will be refunded by CRPF and Rs.48 by state bank of India . For detail please take a glance of attachment with this R.T.I. Communique .
1-Mr. CPIO Please tell me the time till then recruitment cell of C.R.P.F. will return back my payment made as
TO TRANSFER INB CRPF 1815155IG0BWTSOV0 TRANSFER TO 355029 in Mohammed Akaram case.
2-Directorate General, CRPF (Recruitment Branch) Block No.1, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-03
(Grih Mantralaya/ Bharat Sarkar) Help line No : 011- 24368630, Tele/Fax No : 011-24362730
No.A.VI.19/2015-Rectt (Min) Dated, the 12 August, 2016
Shri Yogi M.P.Singh, Mirzapur(UP).
Please provide the name and designation of the staffs who processed my grievances and reached on the conclusion to return back the excess amount charged in the case of Alok Bhardwaj and consequently aforementioned communication was made by department .
3-Please made available circulars /government orders issued to deal such matters if arises with the department.
4-Please made available total excess amount charged from aspirants/students this year and the mode in which this amount was spent.
5-If such excess amount charged from students/aspirants ever returned by any Honest public functionary, then tell me the name and designation of that public staff who acted in public spirit and honestly performed its duty.
This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.