High court asks to seek civil remedy but police being equipped with overriding power

Registration Number PROLW/R/2020/60002
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 04-06-2020
RTI Fee Received    10
Online Reference Number IK0AOAPNS2
Transaction Status Success
Request filed with POLICE RANGE OFFICE LUCKNOW
 Contact Details of Nodal Officer  
Telephone Number 9415757521
Email-ID ojha1166@gmail.com
Registration Number PROLW/R/2020/60002
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 04/06/2020
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 04/06/2020
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9415757521
Email-ID ojha1166@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority POLICE RANGE OFFICE LUCKNOW
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number PROLW/R/2020/60002
Date of Filing 04/06/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought Order of High court attached to communiqué and quote is as- It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere.

1-Provide the order of the competent court as ordered aforementioned.

2-C.O. Cantt may provide information about, how Ashiyana police station is equipped with powers of a civil court.

3-High court categorically stated in its order to seek civil remedy but subsequent proceedings are criminal and Dr Beenu Singh instigating illegally to participate in it. Provide reason.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2019/35924

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
03/11/2019
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
Matter is concerned with the home secretary government of Uttar Pradesh and others. Herewith detail representation is attached in the PDF form. On behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh Mohalla-Surekapuram Jabalpur Road Lakshmi Narayan Baikunh Mahadev Mandir District Mirzapur PIN Code 231001
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
17/03/2020
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित श्रीमान आख्या अवलोकनार्थ सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है अनुमोदित प्रस्तुत प्रकरण की जांच की गयी जांच आख्या संलग्न है
Reply Document
Rating
Poor
Rating Remarks
It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the stair case so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take appropriate remedy. Dated-07/03/2006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justice of High court of Judicature of Allahabad, bench of Lucknow.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Arun Kumar Dube
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
sushil7769@gmail.com
Contact Number
0522 2226349
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bhoomika Singh
5 months ago

I don’t think that it is a partial corruption in my view it is complete corruption which has blessings of the senior rank officers in the administrative hierarchy otherwise such huge corruption which may deprive an individual of his entire life savings may not take place. Think about the report of circle officer Cantt Lucknow which is mockery of the law of land in which circle officer itself suggesting to the aggrieved to follow their Jungle rules and contempt the court order. Now this question arises that whether it is reflection of good governance in the state of Uttar Pradesh undoubtedly not?

Beerbhadra Singh
Beerbhadra Singh
5 months ago

This question arises that whether concerned Public Information Officer will provide information concerned with bogus dealings of the Lucknow police because already home secretary government of Uttar Pradesh did not prvide the information to the aggrieved applicant. What is the value of any rule made by the government because Lucknow police is above entire rules. Every matter is considered under criminal law as being done by the Lucknow police then what is the need of civil laws?

Arun Pratap Singh
5 months ago

Here matter is concerned with the in-discriminatory dealings of the Lucknow police. If the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad, directed to seek civil remedy from an appropriate court, then how Lucknow police terrorised the aggrieved applicant’s family by blatantly misusing its powers by lodging false F.I.Rs. under various serious sections of Indian Penal Code in order vacate the house which was purchased by the aggrieved applicant by providing life saving money to cheater Babu Singh.

Preeti Singh
5 months ago

अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित श्रीमान आख्या अवलोकनार्थ सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है अनुमोदित
Who approved the submitted arbitrary inconsistent report submitted by the staff of the Lucknow police who can not understand the contents of the submitted grievance? If matter is civil accordingly order was passed by the Lucknow bench quite obvious, then how civil remedy can be provided by Ashiyana police?