High court asked for appropriate remedy in competent court but here police is a suppreme court

 

जनसुनवाई
समन्वित शिकायत निवारण प्रणाली, उत्तर प्रदेश
सन्दर्भ संख्या:-40015719066963

 

APPLICANT DETAILS :

 

Name
:
Dinesh Pratap Singh
Father
Name :
Angad Prasad Singh 
Gender
:
MALE
Mobile-1
:
9838919619
Mobile-2
:
9838919619
Email
:
arunpratapsingh904@gmail.com
Address
:
Mohalla Sureakapuram Lakshmi
Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir District Mirzapur 231001

 

GRIEVANCE AREA DETAILS :

 

Area
:
Urban
Grievance
Address :
—-

 

APPLICATION DETAILS :

 

Application
Detail :
Most revered Sir Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows. 1It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India a to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform i to safeguard public property
and to abjure violence j to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement . 2It is submitted before the
Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the following submissions. Most respected Superintendent of police, District
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition
Number 135 HC Year 2006 as follows It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the stair case so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate
remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue
in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out
and take appropriate remedy. Dated 07032006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justices of Division bench of Lucknow. It would be better to take perusal by Sir itself. Respondent 1 State of U.P. through Secretary of home. 2 S.S.P.
Lucknow 3 S.H.O. Ashiyana Police station. Whether competent court means police
as defined by the aforementioned respondents To open the lock of the door and open the door for seeking appropriate remedy means to open the door for always and hatching a conspiracy against the applicant and his family. Consequently, a fabricated First Information Report by colluding with the police was lodged in the police station Ashiyana on 11 July 2009 after 3 years 4 months 4 days of Judgement Dated 07032006 under sections of I.P.C. as case number 2692009 Indian Penal Code sections 448,406,420,467,468,471,394 of
India Penal Code. All these documents were submitted by the police before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the court took the cognizance and passed the order in accordance with the law but later on
police found the records forged and aforementioned fabricated charges not
only framed on the applicant but on his wife and daughter as well. Thus terrorized entire family so they fled by putting locks in the rooms latter
locks were broken and the entire house was grabbed even valuables were looted. Which means Lucknow police had submitted forged records before the High court along with the affidavit. Thus a competent and appropriate court
delivered the Justice
Relief
Type :
Complaint
Address To Officer : क्षेत्राधिकारी
Department Name : गृह एवं गोपन
Category Name : पुलिस के विरूद्ध शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र
Attachment
:
Yes

 

 

 

आवेदन का विवरण
शिकायत संख्या
40015719066963
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
Dinesh Pratap
Singh
आवेदक कर्ता का मोबाइल न०:
9838919619,9838919619
विषय:
Most revered Sir
Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to
the following submissions as follows. 1It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir
that 51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India a
to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the
National Flag and the National Anthemh to develop the scientific temper,
humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform i to safeguard public property
and to abjure violence j to strive towards excellence in all spheres of
individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to
higher levels of endeavour and achievement . 2It is submitted before the
Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the
following submissions. Most respected Superintendent of police, District
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to
draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow
bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition
Number135 HC Year 2006 as follows It is simply ordered that the respondent
number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the stair case so that Smt Anuradha Singh
the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate
remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go
anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention,
therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue
in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since she can not
take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore
it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be
allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the
lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out
and take appropriate remedy. Dated07032006 Signed by the concerned Honourable
Justices of Division bench of Lucknow. It would be better to take perusal by
Sir itself. Respondent1State of U.P. through Secretary of home. 2S.S.P.
Lucknow 3S.H.O. Ashiyana Police station. Whether competent court means police
as defined by the aforementioned respondents To open the lock of the door and
open the door for seeking appropriate remedy means to open the door for
always and hatching a conspiracy against the applicant and his family.
Consequently, a fabricated First Information Report by colluding with the
police was lodged in the police station Ashiyana on 11 July 2009 after 3
years 4 months 4 days of Judgement Dated07032006 under sections of I.P.C. as
case number2692009 Indian Penal Code sections 448,406,420,467,468,471,394 of
India Penal Code. All these documents were submitted by the police before the
Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the court took the
cognizance and passed the order in accordance with the law but later on
police found the records forged and aforementioned fabricated charges not
only framed on the applicant but on his wife and daughter as well. Thus
terrorised entire family so they fled by putting locks in the rooms latter
locks were broken and the entire house was grabbed even valuables were
looted. Which means Lucknow police had submitted forged records before the
High court along with the affidavit. Thus a competent and appropriate court
delivered the Jud
नियत तिथि:
31 – Oct – 2019
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
फीडबैक की स्थिति:

 

आवेदन का संलग्नक

 

अग्रसारित विवरण

 

क्र..
सन्दर्भ का प्रकार
आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश दिनांक
अधिकारी को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
आख्या रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ
01 – Oct – 2019
क्षेत्राधिकारीक्षेत्राधिकारी कैंट
अनमार्क

 

 


Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
How the faith of common man will be ensured in the government machinery if such anarchy will prevail in the system?Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>

1 October 2019 at 01:56

To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, lokayukta@hotmail.com

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement
.

2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the following submissions.

Most respected Superintendent of police, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number-135 H/C Year 2006 as follows-

It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the stair case so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at  her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that  the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take appropriate remedy. Dated-07/03/2006 Signed by the concerned Honourable Justices of Division bench of Lucknow. It would be better to take perusal by Sir itself.

Respondent-1-State of U.P. through Secretary of home.

2-S.S.P. Lucknow 3-S.H.O. Ashiyana Police station.

Whether competent court means police as defined by the aforementioned respondents?

To open the lock of the door and open the door for seeking appropriate remedy means to open the door for always and hatching a conspiracy against the applicant and his family.

Consequently, a fabricated First Information Report by colluding with the police was lodged in the police station Ashiyana on 11 July 2009 after 3 years 4 months 4 days of Judgement Dated-07/03/2006 -under sections of I.P.C. as case number-269/2009 Indian Penal Code- sections 448,406,420,467,468,471,394 of India Penal Code.

All these documents were submitted by the police before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the court took the cognizance and passed the order in accordance with the law but later on police found the records forged and aforementioned fabricated charges not only framed on the applicant but on his wife and daughter as well. Thus terrorised entire family so they fled by putting locks in the rooms latter locks were broken and the entire house was grabbed even valuables were looted. Which means Lucknow police had submitted forged records before the High court along with the affidavit.

Thus a competent and appropriate court delivered the Judgement in the matter in compliance of the High court order Dated-07/03/2006.

On Sun, 31 Mar 2019 at 15:27, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

An application under article 32 of the constitution of India to get a reprieve for a retired correspondent who was deprived of his dwelling place arbitrarily and land Mafia carrying out commercial activities in that house and posed a great danger to Right to Life with dignity.

On behalf of aggrieved individual Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd. Singh Mobile number9838919619 -Address-LD/84B Sleeper Ground, Railway Colony, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh but presently new address-C/O K. P. Singh Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh.

To
The Hon’ble chief justice of India /companion judges
Supreme court of India, New Delhi, India
Petitioner-Yogi M. P. Singh.
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Pincode-231001
Versus
Respondent-1-Principal Secretary, Home,
Department of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.
2-Director General of police,
The government of Uttar Pradesh
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh.
3-Superintendent of police,
District-Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
Prayer-Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd. Singh Mobile number9838919619 seeks justice from the court as appropriate direction be issued to the aforementioned respondents to be instrumental in vacating the house and lodge F.I.R. against Land Mafias cum grabbers who are carrying out commercial activities in the house of the applicant or take action against the Land Maffia cum cheater Babu Singh S/O R. P. Singh Address-1914-18 Kanpur Road scheme, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh who breached the terms of the agreement made on 12-Jun-1998.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement
.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the agreement made on 12-Jun-1998 between the aggrieved person Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd. Singh Mobile number9838919619 and Babu Singh S/O R. P. Singh as follows.

3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that on 11-July-1998 a receipt was made available by the Babu Singh S/O R. P. Singh which explicitly proves that total Rs.300000.00 was paid to the seller Babu Singh S/O R. P. Singh and rest amount was promised to be paid before the sub-registrar Lucknow at the time of execution of the registration of the sale deed. Ipso facto obvious from the following JPG image of the receipt.

4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take the perusal of electricity bill made available to the aggrieved individual Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Late Angad Pd. Singh

5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Sir it is obligatory duty of the police and judiciary to safeguard the property and life of the citizens of this country but I have lost entire money earned throughout the life. Now I, aggrieved individual is living at the house of his daughter and wife expired because of the trauma of this tragic incidence. Where is the justice in this largest democracy in the world? Sir Police has compromised with the land mafias and I was thrown away by the Mafias and no one is paying heed to the representation of the aggrieved individual such is the scenario of this largest democracy in the world.

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? This is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely

Date-31-03-2019              Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001

2 attachments

High court order.pdf
307K

Dinesh Pratap Singh Agreement and pwer of attorney.pdf
1592K

4 comments on High court asked for appropriate remedy in competent court but here police is a suppreme court

  1. All these documents were submitted by the police before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the court took the cognizance and passed the order in accordance with the law but later on police found the records forged and aforementioned fabricated charges not only framed on the applicant but on his wife and daughter as well. Thus terrorised entire family so they fled by putting locks in the rooms latter locks were broken and the entire house was grabbed even valuables were looted. Which means Lucknow police had submitted forged records before the High court along with the affidavit.

  2. Undoubtedly the dealings of the Lucknow police is like demon quite obvious from attached high court orders and latter on dealings of the police. Consequently, a fabricated First Information Report by colluding with the police was lodged in the police station Ashiyana on 11 July 2009 after 3 years 4 months 4 days of Judgement Dated07032006 under sections of I.P.C. as case number2692009 Indian Penal Code sections 448,406,420,467,468,471,394 of India Penal Code. All these documents were submitted by the police before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad and the court took the cognizance and passed the order in accordance with the law but later on police found the records forged and aforementioned fabricated charges not only framed on the applicant but on his wife and daughter as well. Thus terrorised entire family so they fled by putting locks in the rooms latter locks were broken and the entire house was grabbed even valuables were looted.

  3. Think about the gravity of situation that in this largest democracy in the world our accountable public functionary is overlooking the matter of grass injustice by saying that come with the appropriate proceedings. How the corruption will be controlled by our public functionaries if they will overlook the matters concerned with the deep rooted corruption in the government machinery? It is most unfortunate that our public functionaries advocate honesty only on public forum but they are behind the screen itself support the corruption in the government machinery.

  4. यह केवल आदेश दिया गया है कि प्रतिवादी नंबर 4 से 7 सीढ़ी के मामले का ताला खोलेगा ताकि श्रीमती अनुराधा सिंह याचिकाकर्ता घर से बाहर आ सकें और सक्षम अदालत में उचित और उचित उपाय कर सकें और उसके बाद, उनके पास हो सकता है स्वतंत्रता कहीं भी जाने के लि एयह सबसे दुर्भाग्यपूर्ण है कि हमारे सार्वजनिक अधिकारी केवल सार्वजनिक मंच पर ईमानदारी की वकालत करते हैं लेकिन स्क्रीन के पीछे वे स्वयं सरकारी मशीनरी में भ्रष्टाचार का समर्थन करते हैंमाननीय महोदय, आपके आवेदक से यह विनम्र अनुरोध है कि सार्वजनिक सेवाओं को मनमाने ढंग से रोकना और अराजकता, अराजकता और अराजकता को बढ़ावा देना कैसे उचित हो सकता है?

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: