Here public functionaries itself procrastinate in taking decisions which is root cause of corruption

Grievance Status for
registration number : PMOPG/E/2019/0634166
Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Amit
Kumar Singh
Date of Receipt-29/10/2019
Received By Ministry/Department-Prime Ministers
Office
Grievance Description
महोदय तहसीलदार सदर की रिपोर्ट प्रकरण में ग्राम में गंगा
किनारे रेता
की भूमि
में बाेयी गयी फसल कटाई का विवाद था, गेहूँ की फसल अब कट गयी है। श्री मान जी किसी भी शिकायत का निस्तारण शिकायती पत्र
के गुण  दोषों के आधार पर किया
जाता और तहसीलदार महोदय कुछ भी लिख कर दे दिए उसी के आधार पर केस को निस्तारित मान लेना
कहा  तक उचित है ऐसे में तहसीलदार पोस्ट के लिए योग्यता की क्या आवश्यकता है तो तहसीलदार ही उनका कोई अधीनस्थ मौके का निरीक्षण किया और नहीं पार्टिया तहसील मुख्यालय पर तलब की गई फिर यह रिपोर्ट कैसी विपक्ष से कागजात क्यों नहीं
मांगे जाते
विपक्ष वहां
जा कर बिबाद क्यों पैदा
कर रहा है क्योकि उनके
पास जनशक्ति है और देश में कानून ब्यवस्था खत्म
हो चुकी
है  संदर्भ संख्या : 60000190124803
,
दिनांक – 29 Oct 2019 तक की स्थिति
आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :शिकायत संख्या:-60000190124803
आवेदक का नाम-Amit Kumar Singhविषय-Every one knows that role of
the police of the state is of the prosecuting agency which prosecute those
people before the court of law who break the law of land which means those
individuals act against the spirit of constitution. Prosecution of the offender
and to be instrumental in culmination of the prosecution in punishment through
the court of law is the function of the state police. Whether to seek justice
in this largest democracy in the world makes a man guilty in the eye of police
of the government of Uttar Pradesh quite obvious from the attached document to
this representation. Sir according to the report of the circle officer Sadar
dated 02/08/2019 attached to document, station officer of police station
Vindhyachal has been directed to take action on both the parties under section
Cr.P.C. 107/116 of criminal penal code subject to huge sureties. Most
surprising is that there are three reports submitted by three police officers
in which aforementioned para is common. Most respectfully, with due respect,
the applicant Amit Kumar Singh son of Mr. Akhilesh Singh, Village and post
-Babura, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-231001 wants to draw the
kind attention of the most revered Prime minister, chief minister and
Honourable superintendent of Police Mirzapur to the following submissions as
follows. 1-Matter is concerned with the lackadaisical approach of station
officer police station-Vindhyachal in regard to complaint number-40019919021504
submitted by the applicant on 21-May-2019 and report of police station through
station officer was submitted on 28-May-2019. 2-Applicant aggrieved with the
partial approach of the station officer in the matter concerned, police station
-Vindhyachal District -Mirzapur, submitted the feedback in order to revive the
submitted grievance on 29-May-2019 quite obvious from the attached documents
i.e. print of the complaint as aforementioned. 3-After feedback, grievance was
revived and categorised in C category but most surprising is that concerned
officer managed to get the grievance closed by submitting the same report on
the Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh which is mockery of the
law of land. 4-Circle officer and investigation officers did not resolve the
issue
विभाग शिकायत श्रेणी नियोजित तारीख-18-09-2019शिकायत की स्थितिस्तर जनपद स्तरपद जिलाधिकारी
Reminder-Feedback – फीडबैक की स्थिति फीडबैक प्राप्त दिनांक 30/09/2019को फीडबैक:- आख्‍या अपलोड। प्रकरण में ग्राम में गंगा किनारे रेता की भूमि में बाेयी गयी फसल कटाई का विवाद थागेहूँ की फसल अब कट गयी है। प्रकरण का निस्‍तारण किये जाने हेतु आख्‍या प्रेषित। Sir what a justice delivery system in this largest democracy in the world. Marvellous, here applicant is raising the matter concerned with the injustice done with the applicant and Tahsildar Sadar has closed the matter on a flimsy ground without taking the cognizance of the serious issue raised by the aggrieved applicant. Whether it is justified on the part of the Tahsildar sadar that he submitted the report on the august portal Jansunwai of the government of Uttar Pradesh without taking the cognizance of the submissions of the aggrieved applicant moreover it was not deemed fit by him before submitting the closure report in the matter to call upon the aggrieved applicant to be apprised with the matter of fact as the factual position of the case might be instrumental in reaching at any logical conclusion. Here core point of the controversy is the non impartial approach of the police concerned in the matter ipso facto obvious from the contents of the submissions of the grievance. Here this question arises that who reaped the crop by taking under teeth the direction of the Tahsildar sadar? Undoubtedly the crop was sowed on the part of the applicant but opposition took mileage by forcibly taking it through the muscle power and taking police concerned in good faith. In order to curb such criminal activities which may result in havoc, need of the hour is to take action against wrongdoers but because of the biased approach of the concerned incredible police, entire efforts of the applicant gone in the vain. Now Tahsildar Sadar instead reaching on the justified conclusion in the matter only busy in closing the grievance arbitrarily. Sir Right to reason is the indispensable part of the judicial, quasi and administrative decisions. Whether the decision of the Tahsildar sadar to close the grievance arbitrarily is a reasoned decision? Sir please relook into the matter of fact of the submitted grievance in order to provide justice and establish the rule of law in system so that faith of the citizenry in the government machinery may be enhanced. 
Grievance Document
Current Status-Grievance Received Date of Action-29/10/2019
Officer Concerns To Forwarded to-Prime
Ministers Office
Officer Name-Shri Ambuj Sharma
Officer Designation-Under Secretary (Public)
Contact Address-Public Wing 5th Floor, Rail
Bhawan New Delhi
Email Address-ambuj.sharma38@nic.in
Contact Number-011-23386447

महोदय तहसीलदार सदर की रिपोर्ट –

प्रकरण में ग्राम में गंगा किनारे रेता की भूमि में बाेयी गयी फसल कटाई का विवाद था, गेहूँ की फसल अब कट गयी है। श्री मान जी किसी भी शिकायत का निस्तारण शिकायती पत्र के गुण  दोषों के आधार पर किया जाता और तहसीलदार महोदय कुछ भी लिख कर दे दिए उसी के आधार पर केस को निस्तारित मान लेना कहा  तक उचित है | ऐसे में तहसीलदार पोस्ट के लिए योग्यता की क्या आवश्यकता है | न तो तहसीलदार न ही उनका कोई अधीनस्थ मौके का निरीक्षण किया और नहीं पार्टिया तहसील मुख्यालय पर तलब की गई फिर यह रिपोर्ट कैसी | विपक्ष से कागजात क्यों नहीं मांगे जाते विपक्ष वहां जा कर बिबाद क्यों पैदा कर रहा है क्योकि उनके पास जनशक्ति है और देश में कानून ब्यवस्था खत्म हो चुकी है | 

संदर्भ संख्या : 60000190124803 , दिनांक – 29 Oct 2019 तक की स्थिति
आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :शिकायत संख्या:-60000190124803
आवेदक का नाम-Amit Kumar Singhविषय-Every one knows that role of the police of the state is of the prosecuting agency which prosecute those people before the court of law who break the law of land which means those individuals act against the spirit of constitution. Prosecution of the offender and to be instrumental in culmination of the prosecution in punishment through the court of law is the function of the state police. Whether to seek justice in this largest democracy in the world makes a man guilty in the eye of police of the government of Uttar Pradesh quite obvious from the attached document to this representation. Sir according to the report of the circle officer Sadar dated 02/08/2019 attached to document, station officer of police station Vindhyachal has been directed to take action on both the parties under section Cr.P.C. 107/116 of criminal penal code subject to huge sureties. Most surprising is that there are three reports submitted by three police officers in which aforementioned para is common. Most respectfully, with due respect, the applicant Amit Kumar Singh son of Mr. Akhilesh Singh, Village and post -Babura, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-231001 wants to draw the kind attention of the most revered Prime minister, chief minister and Honourable superintendent of Police Mirzapur to the following submissions as follows. 1-Matter is concerned with the lackadaisical approach of station officer police station-Vindhyachal in regard to complaint number-40019919021504 submitted by the applicant on 21-May-2019 and report of police station through station officer was submitted on 28-May-2019. 2-Applicant aggrieved with the partial approach of the station officer in the matter concerned, police station -Vindhyachal District -Mirzapur, submitted the feedback in order to revive the submitted grievance on 29-May-2019 quite obvious from the attached documents i.e. print of the complaint as aforementioned. 3-After feedback, grievance was revived and categorised in C category but most surprising is that concerned officer managed to get the grievance closed by submitting the same report on the Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh which is mockery of the law of land. 4-Circle officer and investigation officers did not resolve the issue that how the opposition party can take away two tractors crop and applicant only one tractor yet applicant and his family is the offender. 5-Since the month of March, aggrieved father of the applicant is seeking interference of police in the matter and police concerned remained reluctant and did not make any initiative in the matter and now when the applicant is making representation to various accountable public functionaries in order to seek justice, then applicant and his peace loving father who is a teacher by profession are the great danger to the peace and tranquillity of the area. 6-Sir, whether to seek justice is an offence in this largest democracy in the world? Why police is silent in regard to two tractors of crops taken away by offenders which is the core issue of the tussle and every one is apprised with this simple and straight facts but police investigating matter is putting carpet on it. Whether it is not reflection of inscrutable face sphinx? 7-Sir, whether police in the government of Uttar Pradesh does not redress the grievances of the common people in accordance with the submissions of the grievances but through a parrot reply not consistent with the contents of the submissions ipso facto obvious from the attached reports submitted on the august portal. Date-07-08-2019 Yours sincerely Amit Kumar Singh S/O Akhilesh Singh address as aforementioned.
विभाग -शिकायत श्रेणी – नियोजित तारीख-18-09-2019शिकायत की स्थिति- स्तर -जनपद स्तरपद -जिलाधिकारी
Reminder-Feedback – फीडबैक की स्थिति -फीडबैक प्राप्त
संलग्नक देखें -Click here नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!
अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :
क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक आदेश/आपत्ति आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति संलगनक
1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग – 1(मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 03-09-2019 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। जिलाधिकारी-मिर्ज़ापुर, 25-09-2019 अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित निक्षेपित
2 अंतरित जिलाधिकारी 03-09-2019 नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें उप जिलाधि‍कारी-सदर,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग 25-09-2019 अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित निक्षेपित
3 अंतरित उप जिलाधि‍कारी (राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग ) 03-09-2019 नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें तहसीलदार-सदर,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग 25-09-2019 आख्‍या अपलोड। प्रकरण में ग्राम में गंगा किनारे रेता की भूमि में बाेयी गयी फसल कटाई का विवाद था, गेहूँ की फसल अब कट गयी है। प्रकरण का निस्‍तारण किये जाने हेतु आख्‍या प्रेषित। निस्तारित
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yogi
1 year ago

Sir what a justice delivery system in this largest democracy in the world. Marvellous, here applicant is raising the matter concerned with the injustice done with the applicant and Tahsildar Sadar has closed the matter on a flimsy ground without taking the cognizance of the serious issue raised by the aggrieved applicant.

Preeti Singh
11 months ago

महोदय तहसीलदार सदर की रिपोर्ट – प्रकरण में ग्राम में गंगा किनारे रेता की भूमि में बाेयी गयी फसल कटाई का विवाद था, गेहूँ की फसल अब कट गयी है। श्री मान जी किसी भी शिकायत का निस्तारण शिकायती पत्र के गुण दोषों के आधार पर किया जाता और तहसीलदार महोदय कुछ भी लिख कर दे दिए उसी के आधार पर केस को निस्तारित मान लेना कहा तक उचित है | ऐसे में तहसीलदार पोस्ट के लिए योग्यता की क्या आवश्यकता है | न तो तहसीलदार न ही उनका कोई अधीनस्थ मौके का निरीक्षण किया और नहीं पार्टिया तहसील मुख्यालय पर तलब की गई फिर यह रिपोर्ट कैसी | विपक्ष से कागजात क्यों नहीं मांगे जाते विपक्ष वहां जा कर बिबाद क्यों पैदा कर रहा है क्योकि उनके पास जनशक्ति है और देश में कानून ब्यवस्था खत्म हो चुकी है |

Beerbhadra Singh
11 months ago

It is well established fact that grievances are redressed in accordance with the submissions made in the grievances by the concerned public functionaries but here it seems that our public functionaries have forgotten the procedure how to redress a grievance that is why they are submitting arbitrary reports on the August portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh jansunwai which is quite obvious from the submitted report of the tahsildar Sadar here this question arises that when the matter is concerned with the arbitrary claim of the opposite party that the crop which was not sown by them but the prepared crop was carried on by them in Tractors in order to keep the craft in their own possession which was not only illegal but also a criminal act and concerned police colluded with them they provided the illegal gratification to the police and police concerned supported them and they have no document of the concerned because that land belongs to the government,