Here petitioners die with the epectation that a day will come when their cases will be disposed but never comes.

Case Status – Allahabad
Pending
Writ – A / 20121 /
2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner:
RAJENDRA PRATAP
SINGH
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P. AND
OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):
P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ
Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single
Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing:
10/04/2006
Last Listed on:
25/11/2016 in
Court No. 1
Next Listing Date:
To be listed on
02/08/2017
This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information
regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained
under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may
be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

 Hon’ble Sir,AT 10.00 A.M. date:
                    COURT NO. 1
                   
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SINHA
 Fresh
and listed: (i) Service writs relating to educational institutions from 1
 -January
2016; (ii) Listed service writs(except service writs relating employees
– of High
Court and District Judiciary) from 1 January 2001 to 31 December, 2010
           
for orders, admission and hearing including bunch cases.
                                     
For Admission
                             Please provide information point wise as sought
by your applicant in regard to following points.
1-Please
made available number of cases listed by Registry of High court Allahabad for
hearing on 25/11/2016 in Court No. 1 in the High Court of judicature at
Allahabad.
2-Please
made available number of cases heard by Hon’ble aforesaid court out of
aforementioned sought listed cases.
3-Please
made available the name and designation of public servant under whose
supervision aforementioned sought listed cases were listed for hearing
on 25/11/2016 in Court No. 1 in the High Court of judicature at Allahabad.
4-Please
made available the basic criteria to list a case before Hon’ble court by the
registry of High court of judicature at Allahabad.
5-Please
made available the fate of non heard cases by the court in regard to their
processing for next listing by the registry of High Court of judicature at
Allahabad.
Dear Yogi M P Singh,
Your online appeal is diarised. Details are given below:
1 Diary Number 601412
2 Diary date 12-03-2017
Please logon to : www.cic.gov.in for any further details.
Regards,
Central Information Commission (CIC)
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION 2
nd Floor, ‘B’ Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, 
Bhikaji Cama Place, NEW DELHI­110 066
TEL: 011­26717355  
Appeal No. CIC/CC/A/2014/001147/VS 
Appellant:
Shri Yogi M.P. Singh,           
Mohalla­Surekapuram,    
Jabalpur Road,        
 Distt. Mirzapur, U.P.   
 Respondent:Central Public Information Officer
,
Allahabad High Court,          
Allahabad.     
                                                               
Date of Hearing:
     26.10.2015       
Date of Decision:
  4.11.2015 
       
                     
          
O R D E R 
RTI application: 1. The   appellant   filed   an   RTI
  application   dated   18.3.2014   seeking  
information
regarding copy of counter affidavit submitted by Director Secondary Education Arth­1
Allahabad.   The PIO responded  on 27.3.2014.
    The  appellant  filed first  appeal
 dated
31.3.2014 with the first appellate authority.  The FAA responded on 5.5.2014. The appellant
filed second appeal on 24.9.2014 with the Commission. 
Hearing: 
2.
The appellant participated in the hearing through audio. 
 The respondent did not
participate in the hearing.  
3.
The appellant referred his RTI application dated 18.3.2014 and reiterated the points
mentioned in the RTI application.  The appellant stated that he wanted to know whether the
Director Secondary Education has filed counter affidavit in writ petition No. 20121 of 2006
or not.  The appellant further stated that if the Director Secondary Education has filed the
counter affidavit, then a copy of counter affidavit should be provided  
Decision: 
4.The respondent is directed to provide the appellant, within 30 days of this order,
information sought in the RTI application. 
The appeal is disposed of.  Copy of decision 
be given free of cost to the parties. 
           
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                       
               
 (Vijai Sharma) 
           
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                       
    Chief Information Commissioner   
Authenticated true copy   
(Dhirendra Kumar)    
Deputy Secretary and Deputy Registrar
 

2 comments on Here petitioners die with the epectation that a day will come when their cases will be disposed but never comes.

  1. Case Status – Allahabad

    Pending

    Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]

    Petitioner:
    RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
    Respondent:
    STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
    Counsel (Pet.):
    P.C. CHAUHAN
    Counsel (Res.):
    C.S.C.
    Category:
    Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
    Date of Filing:
    10/04/2006
    Last Listed on:
    25/11/2016 in Court No. 1
    Next Listing Date:
    To be listed on 02/08/2017
    This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).

  2. If action be taken on the following directions ,then there is no need of further proceeding but why high court is itself not interested in the getting compliance of its own order is part of of cryptic dealings.3. The appellant referred his RTI application dated 18.3.2014 and reiterated the points mentioned in the RTI application. The appellant stated that he wanted to know whether the Director Secondary Education has filed counter affidavit in writ petition No. 20121 of 2006 or not. The appellant further stated that if the Director Secondary Education has filed the counter affidavit, then a copy of counter affidavit should be provided
    Decision:
    4.The respondent is directed to provide the appellant, within 30 days of this order, information sought in the RTI application. The appeal is disposed of. Copy of decision be given free of cost to the parties.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: