Govt. of U. P. may tell citizenry in state why recovery of penalty imposed on 709 PIOs by UPSIC could not be made

Gmail Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
There is complete constitutional crisis in the state of Uttar Pradesh and constitutional functionaries have been made teeth less by overlooking their orders.
1 message
Yogi M. P. Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com> Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:26 PM
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, “presidentofindia@rb.nic.in” <presidentofindia@rb.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, “cmup@up.nic.in” <cmup@up.nic.in>, “hgovup@up.nic.in” <hgovup@up.nic.in>, “csup@up.nic.in” <csup@up.nic.in>, “uphrclko@yahoo.co.in” <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>, “sec.sic@up.nic.in” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, Anjali Anand Srivastava <secy-cic@nic.in>
 Now a days instead of redressing the grievances of the citizenry, e-mail of public spirited persons are spammed by the accountable public functionaries in the state of Uttar Pradesh as well as in PMO.

सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम २००५ की धारा २० के आधीन अधिरोपित ऐसी शास्तियों का विवरण जिनकी वसूली नही हुई है -वर्ष २०१७ में अधिरोपित शास्ति का विवरण

वर्ष २०१७ में अधिरोपित कुल शास्ति संख्या ७०९ है | विस्तृत विवरण के लिए संलग्नको का अवलोकन करे |

Merely in the year 2017, Honourable commission imposed 709 pecuniary penalties and concerned district Magistrate were directed to recover the imposed penalties but the government of Bhartiya Janata Party did not recover the imposed penalties as it has no regard for the rule of law. Only those personnel are posted at the post of district magistrate who are really incompetent for the post and blindly follows the dictates of local political masters without thinking the pros and cons.

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that  51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;

(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;

(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.

2-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following information sought by the applicant as follows but not provided by the concerned.

On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 at 14:45, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh submitted written representation before district magistrate Mirzapur regarding recovery of penalties imposed on four district level officers who made the mockery of the provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005. Hundreds of representations submitted later on by the information seeker but cryptic reply were provided on the part of District Magistrate Mirzapur. Whether it is not a reflection of the deep-rooted corruption in the system where compliance of orders of constitutional functionaries is not made. Vide attached document for detail. PIO may provide access to information concerning the recovery of the penalty imposed by SIC Uttar Pradesh 4 PIOs.

1-Copy of Treasury Challan made in the four cases.

2-Name of the PIO, still not paid the imposed penalty with detail of cause, not complying order of SIC.

3-Reason of failure of D. M. Mirzapur in ensuring compliance of SIC orders attached to communiqué.

3-It is to be submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that hundreds of communications exchanged from the accountable public functionaries but no recovery is being made by the concerned accountable public functionaries and R.T.I. Communiques in the state is not cultivating any fruit as it/ Right to Information Act 2005 has been thrown by the state government into the heap of garbage.

खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |

इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-06/08/2020           Yours sincerely

Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

 

 

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 

2 attachments
Gmail – Whether it is not obligation of D.M. Mirzapur to ensure recovery of imposed penalties on erring public information officers by state information commission_.pdf
3714K
Penalty_From January-2017-to-December-2017.pdf
482K
Gmail Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Bank transaction is successful which means fee payment made but registration number yet to be received from website.
1 message
Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com> Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 9:08 PM
To: helprtionline-dopt@nic.in, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>
Following is the transaction detail through which fee under R.T.I. Act 2005 paid online on the R.T.I. website of the government of India.

  29 Aug 2020 TO TRANSFER-INB RTI Online PaymentIRDAIR20200000 000765IK0ARBHE H7 TRANS 10.00  

Following information sought by the applicant.

Grievance Status for registration number: DEAID/E/2020/04733

Name Of Complainant-Yogi M P Singh Date of Receipt-01/08/2020 For detail, vide attached document.

CPIO may be directed to provide the information pointwise as sought within time as stipulated under subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act of 2005.

1-Provide the name and designation of the public staffs monitoring the aforementioned grievance.

2-Provide the time taken by the concerned staffs to redress the grievance under citizen charter.

3-Provide the action taken by the department on the aforementioned grievance.

Feedback has been provided by the information seeker which has been successfully saved quite obviously from the attached snapshot. 

Document.pdf
81K
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Vandana Singh
Vandana Singh
2 months ago

माननीय योगी जी जहां आप की लड़ाई भ्रष्टाचार के खिलाफ थी तो भी आप के शासनकाल में भ्रष्टाचार अपना चरण फैलाते चला जा रहा है। यदि आप के शासनकाल में भ्रष्टाचार खत्म नहीं हुआ तो हमारे देश में कोई भी सरकार बने भ्रष्टाचार खत्म नहीं होगा। कम से कम आप अपने शासनकाल में भ्रष्टाचार के खिलाफ कठोर से कठोर कानून लगाएं। ताकि अपराधी एक बार अपराध करने से पहले जरूर सोचेगा दंड व्यवस्था कमजोर होने के कारण उत्तर प्रदेश में अपराधी बेखौफ घूमते हैं

Preeti Singh
3 months ago

सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम २००५ की धारा २० के आधीन अधिरोपित ऐसी शास्तियों का विवरण जिनकी वसूली नही हुई है -वर्ष २०१७ में अधिरोपित शास्ति का विवरण
वर्ष २०१७ में अधिरोपित कुल शास्ति संख्या ७०९ है | विस्तृत विवरण के लिए संलग्नको का अवलोकन करे |
Undoubtedly it is a scandal so its enquiry must be carried out by an independent body and accountability of concerned be fixed.

Arun Pratap Singh
3 months ago

Undoubtedly matter concerned itself reflecting failure of the government machinery and complete absence of provisions of constitution of India. Huge amount of recovery is pending against erring public information officers which is mockery of not only provisions of the Right to Information Act 2005 but showing complete absence of provisions of constitution of India in the state of Uttar Pradesh.. I think that state of Uttar Pradesh is fit to impose Article 356 to restore law order machinery in the state.

Yogi M. P. Singh
3 months ago

Following is reflecting the good governance of the Modi Sir that R.T.I. portal is in the dilapidated state and not completing the online applications to seek information.
1-Provide the name and designation of the public staffs monitoring the aforementioned grievance.

2-Provide the time taken by the concerned staffs to redress the grievance under citizen charter.

3-Provide the action taken by the department on the aforementioned grievance.

Feedback has been provided by the information seeker which has been successfully saved quite obviously from the attached snapshot.

Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
2 months ago

Undoubtedly matter is serious as concerned with the recovery of imposed penalties by the Uttar Pradesh state information commission by the government of Uttar Pradesh which is a mockery of the provisions of the Constitution of India and such practices must be curbed at any cost. Undoubtedly Right to Information act 2005 is the tools which has provided power to the common citizenry of this country and non recovery of penalty is making it weak.

God Man
God Man
17 days ago

Non recovery of the imposed penalties in the state of Uttar Pradesh from the public information officers is the reflection of Anarchy in the government machinery and also implies the incompetence of the the state information commission especially its accountable public functionaries.