From District Judge Lucknow to ACJM III still not reached while it reached from MZP to LCK in 3 days

Booked At
Booked On
Destination Pincode
Tariff
Article Type
Delivery Location
Delivery Confirmed On
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
13/10/2019 17:57:19
226001
30.00
Registered Post
Lucknow GPO
16/10/2019 16:35:08


Event Details For : RU541008400IN


Current Status : Item Delivery Confirmed


Date
Time
Office
Event
16/10/2019
16:35:08
Lucknow GPO
Item Delivery Confirmed
16/10/2019
11:35:29
Lucknow GPO
Out for Delivery
16/10/2019
08:39:14
Lucknow GPO
Item Received
15/10/2019
16:06:55
CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Bagged
15/10/2019
15:29:52
CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Received
15/10/2019
03:44:04
CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Bagged
14/10/2019
23:10:31
CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Received
13/10/2019
20:23:22
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Dispatched
13/10/2019
20:22:35
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Bagged
13/10/2019
17:57:19
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Booked


Grievance Status for
registration number : DEPOJ/E/2019/04435
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt-01/12/2019
Received By Ministry/Department-Justice
Grievance Description-Presently applicant is living
in the Mirzapur district at more than 200 K.M. distance from state capital
Lucknow as his house has been grabbed and household articles have been looted
made queries which was sent  on 13-10-2019 to additional chief judicial
magistrate third through District Judge Lucknow and received in the office of
District judge Lucknow on 16-10-2019 quite obvious from the attached registered
post tracking. It is most unfortunate that from Mirzapur to Lucknow
communication took only three days while from office of District Judge Lucknow
to office of additional chief judicial magistrate third, it still not
reached. Sir open court means a court or trial to
which members of the public are freely admitted but here
representations of the defendant is not being freely admitted. If the
registered post with entire formalities fulfilled is not being accepted by the
concerned authorities for open court hearing, then think about the oral
argument.
An
application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh son of  Angad Prasad Singh
living at Mohalla Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, PIN
Code-231001, State-Uttar Pradesh Mobile number-9838919619.Matter of
fact is concerned with the court of additional chief judicial magistrate third,
District court, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh in regard to crime number-269 of the year
2009 under I.P.C. Section-420,448 and 406 concerned with police station
-Ashiyana. Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh ruthlessly expelled from his house by
looting belongings of the house holds and other valuables by the opposite party
in caucus with the police concerned by making the mockery of the order passed
by the Lucknow bench of the High Court of judicature at Allahabad and
slapping serious charges  under aforementioned sections and many more
others not only on the aggrieved applicant but also his wife who expired under
trauma and daughter as well.
Grievance Document
Current Status-Grievance received Date of Action-01/12/2019
Officer Concerns To Forwarded to-Justice Officer Name-Smt Sushma Taishete
Officer Designation-Joint Secretary Contact Address-Jaisalmer House, 26 Mansingh
Road, New Delhi
Email Address-jsst-doj@gov.in Contact Number-01123385020

In the court of A.C.J.M. III, District Court District-Lucknow


                 Crime Number-269 of the year 2009


                Under I.P.C. section-420, 448 and 406


               Police station-Ashiyana, District-Lucknow


                       State versus Dinesh Pratap Singh


Prayer-Proceedings is against the spirit of the order Dated-07/03/2006 passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad if Aradhana Singh also named Guddi is Anuradha Singh.


Most respected Sir, the applicant aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 as follows It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at her home but since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent court, therefore it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh may come out and take appropriate remedy.


Dated-07/03/2006                     Signed by the concerned Hon’ble Justices of Division bench of Lucknow.


Following queries are made to the plaintiff as follows.


1-    Whether police can provide the civil remedy or police is the competent court? Whether the police informed the court in regard to the aforementioned order? Applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble court that the respondent number First is Secretary of home department, civil secretariat, Government of Uttar Pradesh and respondent number second who is senior superintendent of police Lucknow as well as the station house officer police station Ashiyana who is the respondent number 3 in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh.


2-   What is the cause of three I.Ds. of Aradhana Singh and her mother is having two I.Ds. ? Undoubtedly an individual is free to change its name but by changing the name to get public assistance illegally and seek justices in order to achieve its ulterior motives can’t be justified.


3-   When the station house officer police station-Ashiyana remained the respondent number -3 in the aforementioned case, why had he made the mockery of the order of the High court of judicature at Allahabad?


4-   Whether civil remedy can be sought through criminal proceedings as being done by police concerned even when their senior rank officers have been made in the party in the matter placed before the division bench of the High court and court passed an explicit order?


5-   Whether it is not contempt of court that fabricated charges of serious nature were slapped by the police in order to terrorize the applicant and his family members so that they may leave their house and police and the party concerned may achieve their ulterior motives?


6-   Why did the police change its stand submitted in its affidavit before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad which means, misled the Hon’ble court?


Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to pass the order that concerned may reply to the queries made by the aggrieved applicant and alleged accused in the case being pursued by the police. For this applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.


Date-13-10-2019                                        Applicant/alleged accused


                                                    Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh


Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, Lskshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, District-Mirzapur, PIN Code-231001.

4 comments on From District Judge Lucknow to ACJM III still not reached while it reached from MZP to LCK in 3 days

  1. Matter of fact is concerned with the court of additional chief judicial magistrate third, District court, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh in regard to crime number-269 of the year 2009 under I.P.C. Section-420,448 and 406 concerned with police station -Ashiyana. Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh ruthlessly expelled from his house by looting belongings of the house holds and other valuables by the opposite party in caucus with the police concerned by making the mockery of the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High Court of judicature at Allahabad and slapping serious charges under aforementioned sections and many more others not only on the aggrieved applicant but also his wife who expired under trauma and daughter as well.

  2. Why did the police change its stand submitted in its affidavit before the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad which means, misled the Hon’ble court? Whether it is not reflection of rampant corruption in the lower judiciary being played by the police in caucus with the judicial members? It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Whether Lucknow police and A.C.J.M. Court can provide CIVIL remedy and competent court to deliver civil remedy?

  3. Role of the police is quite negative as the circumstances reveal that here police not only made the contempt of court by taking under teeth the order passed by the single bench of the Lucknow bench of High Court of judicature at Allahabad but also made the mockery of the law of land by interfering with a civil matter which is not obligatory duty of police as the police only interfere in the criminal matter and also misled the court by Providing criminal remedy in a civil matter which is mockery of the law of land.

  4. Undoubtedly it is reflecting complete Anarchy and total lawlessness in the government machinery especially judiciary and most unfortunate is that even repeated complaints are being made by the aggrieved and public spirited persons but this mis management is not being removed from the judiciary. How much shameless that we talk of open court hearing but not considering the representations of the the aggrieved applicant sent through the registered post.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: