Following submissions were accepted by High court of judicature at Allahabad now no likely date only fixed date

Be it known to Hon’ble Sir that “next listing date likely” is changed after two months on the website of High court at Allahabad and it is cryptic when the writ will be fixed. Whether this website ensures transparency in the function of High court. Information available on website can’t ascertain the confident of common people as there is no accountability in these information like “likely listing date may convert into fixed date”.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

5/1/14

to urgent-actionpmosbsupremecourthgovupsecypgddpg2-arpgcsupcmup
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Case Status – Allahabad
Pending
Writ – A / 20121 / 2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner:
RAJENDRA PRATAP SINGH
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):
P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing:
10/04/2006
Last Listed on:
06/12/2007 in Court No. 25
Next Listing Date (Likely):
07/07/2014
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Sought Information.
Please made available the copy of counter affidavit submitted by Director secondary education Arth-1 Allahabad.
If not submitted , how more time will be taken by Director as he is prime accused in the matter who superseded the order of High court.
Pasted from <http://yogimpsingh.blogspot.in/2014/04/whether-high-court-can-deliver-us.html> Why C.P.I.O. High court is not providing aforesaid sought information. Whether accountable functionaries don’t want transparency and accountability in its function. Why has he withheld sought information on flimsy ground .
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
  “ 8-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that from the attachment it is obvious from points 15  that aggrieved petitioner took the shelter fourth time in the High court at Allahabad and filed petition against the impugned order dated 1.2.2006 issued by director education (arth) Allahabad and Hon’ble High court passed the in writ no.20121/06 on 13.4.2006 that apparently the director education (arth) Allahabad through its order dated 1.2.2006 took under teeth the direction of High court ……. so counter affidavit may be submitted within ….. but counter affidavit was submitted by DIOS Mirzapur not by three others. More surprising is that director education (arth) Allahabad itself didn’t submit counter affidavit.                                                                                             9-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that order passed  by High court at Allahabad on13.4.2006  was specially against director education (arth) Allahabad but the counter affidavit was submitted by DIOS on behalf of other three senior rank officer to DIOS. Here this question arises that whether for aforesaid impugned order of Director education (arth) Allahabad DIOS is accountable. When my father will get the justice?”
4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 8-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that from the attachment it is obvious from points 15  that aggrieved petitioner took the shelter fourth time in the High court at Allahabad and filed petition against the impugned order dated 1.2.2006 issued by director education (arth) Allahabad and Hon’ble High court passed the in writ no.20121/06 on 13.4.2006 that apparently the director education (arth) Allahabad through its order dated 1.2.2006 took under teeth the direction of High court ……. so counter affidavit may be submitted within ….. but counter affidavit was submitted by DIOS Mirzapur not by three others. More surprising is that director education (arth) Allahabad itself didn’t submit counter affidavit. 
5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
Next Listing Date (Likely):
06/05/2014
And now
Next Listing Date (Likely):
07/07/2014
It seems that this next listing will change again after two months .
This humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that when this Next listing date likely will be fixed date. Please fix it.  For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                           Yours sincerely
                                             Yogi M. P. Singh
Mohalla-Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road , District-Mirzapur. State-Uttar Pradesh , India 

2 comments on Following submissions were accepted by High court of judicature at Allahabad now no likely date only fixed date

  1. " 8-It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that from the attachment it is obvious from points 15 that aggrieved petitioner took the shelter fourth time in the High court at Allahabad and filed petition against the impugned order dated 1.2.2006 issued by director education (arth) Allahabad and Hon'ble High court passed the in writ no.20121/06 on 13.4.2006 that apparently the director education (arth) Allahabad through its order dated 1.2.2006 took under teeth the direction of High court ……. so counter affidavit may be submitted within ….. but counter affidavit was submitted by DIOS Mirzapur not by three others. More surprising is that director education (arth) Allahabad itself didn't submit counter affidavit.

  2. Whether CPIO raised the points under point 1 is justified. According to him information seeker didn't pay the requisite fee so notings can't be made available. Most surprising is that he was providing the sought information under the direction of chief information commissioner of India. Whether he knows that by stating so he violated the provisions of right to information Act and against the dignity of commission.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: