First appeal submitted against misleading and incomlete information of CPIO Central ministry.

Subject-Denial of sought information by the
concerned CPIO in R.T.I. Application registered as
MORLD/R/2017/50287 filed on 17/03/2017.
Accordingly, your RTI application has been forwarded to the
State Govt. of Uttar Pradesh vide letter No. K-11018/01/2017-RH dated 10th
April 2017 to take necessary action in the matter and copy of the same has been
endorsed to you also.
Whether
information seeker doesn’t know this fact that central sponsored scheme is
being implemented by state government but who is monitoring this scheme?
Whether
accountability of central staffs can be overlooked in the name of state
government is implementing agency. In order to give clean chit to its
department how cunningly CPIO included those paragraphs which were not
concerned with the sought information.
Form this cryptic reply one thing is clear that once central
government provided the public fund to state implementing agency, then its
entire responsibilities are over. Whether the staffs of state government are
looting this fund or properly using this fund is not subjected to scrutiny of
department of central government.
Whether to curb siphoning of public fund meant to weaker and
downtrodden section in central sponsored scheme are not the responsibilities of
central government as state government with its department is implementing
agency.
Please take a model of corruption in the state by taking
perusal of attached documents in which report of enquiry carried out by joint
team of two district level officers is contained. Even after two years, no
recovery was made by D.M. Mirzapur from bunglers moreover your appellant
knocked almost every door in order to be instrumental to provide justice to
weaker section.
    THEY MUST PROVIDE
THE SOGHT INFORMATION AS SOUGHT BY YOUR APPELLANT. POINT WISE TO THE POINT BE
MADE AVAILABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW.
Central public
information officer of ministry of Rural (Housing Division ) development may be
directed to provide following information under subsection 1 of section 6 of
Right to Information Act 2005 within stipulated time as prescribed under
subsection 1 of section 7 of right to Information Act 2005,
Sought
Information 1 –Please made available details in regard to precautions taken by
the central ministry in order to curb irregularities and ensure proper
implementation of scheme like Indira Avas and others so that siphoning of
public fund may be curbed effectively.
Sought
Information 2 –Please made available details under which circumstances,
government allows multiple unique identities for a citizenry so that its staffs
may siphon public fund without informing citizenry concerned as being done
quite obvious from attached documents.
Sought
Information 3 –Please made available details of rules and regulations which
prohibit central staffs or responsible public functionaries of central ministry
ensure proper implementation public fund provided by the central government to
state government. In case of attached matter no action taken by central
ministry. 
Sought Information 4 – Please made available details of provision made by government which
allows multiple Indira Avases to single beneficiaries ipso facto obvious from
attached documents with R.T.I. Communication.
Sought
Information 5 –Please made available details of action if B.D.O. says that such
entries are consequent of mistake concerned staffs and same staffs has been
scolded /reprimanded but latter he himself pursues same path and inspected
those imaginary made Indira Avases and issued rest of fund.
This is humble request of your
applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to
overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary
manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is
encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving
poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take
concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your
applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                         
Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P.
Singh Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road
District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India .

Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number MORLD/A/2017/60058
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 16-04-2017
Appeal filed with Ministry of Rural Development
 Contact Details  
Telephone Number 23387591
Email Id kapoor.singh@nic.in

2 comments on First appeal submitted against misleading and incomlete information of CPIO Central ministry.

  1. Whether information seeker doesn’t know this fact that central sponsored scheme is being implemented by state government but who is monitoring this scheme?
    Whether accountability of central staffs can be overlooked in the name of state government is implementing agency. In order to give clean chit to its department how cunningly CPIO included those paragraphs which were not concerned with the sought information.
    Form this cryptic reply one thing is clear that once central government provided the public fund to state implementing agency, then its entire responsibilities are over. Whether the staffs of state government are looting this fund or properly using this fund is not subjected to scrutiny of department of central government.
    Whether to curb siphoning of public fund meant to weaker and downtrodden section in central sponsored scheme are not the responsibilities of central government as state government with its department is implementing agency.
    Please take a model of corruption in the state by taking perusal of attached documents in which report of enquiry carried out by joint team of two district level officers is contained. Even after two years, no recovery was made by D.M. Mirzapur from bunglers moreover your appellant knocked almost every door in order to be instrumental to provide justice to weaker section.

  2. Central public information officer of ministry of Rural (Housing Division ) development may be directed to provide following information under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information Act 2005 within stipulated time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of right to Information Act 2005,
    Sought Information 1 –Please made available details in regard to precautions taken by the central ministry in order to curb irregularities and ensure proper implementation of scheme like Indira Avas and others so that siphoning of public fund may be curbed effectively.
    Sought Information 2 –Please made available details under which circumstances, government allows multiple unique identities for a citizenry so that its staffs may siphon public fund without informing citizenry concerned as being done quite obvious from attached documents.
    Sought Information 3 –Please made available details of rules and regulations which prohibit central staffs or responsible public functionaries of central ministry ensure proper implementation public fund provided by the central government to state government. In case of attached matter no action taken by central ministry.
    Sought Information 4 – Please made available details of provision made by government which allows multiple Indira Avases to single beneficiaries ipso facto obvious from attached documents with R.T.I. Communication.
    Sought Information 5 –Please made available details of action if B.D.O. says that such entries are consequent of mistake concerned staffs and same staffs has been scolded /reprimanded but latter he himself pursues same path and inspected those imaginary made Indira Avases and issued rest of fund.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: