First appeal exhausted, Surprising D.M. Lucknow did not touch R.T.I. Communique

Registration Number DOCMO/R/2020/60003
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 05/01/2020
Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 26/02/2020
Reply :- PMOPG/E/2019/0617755 60000190167779 DM lucknow dt 04-02-2020
View Document
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454413175
Email-ID shivprakashtiwari64992@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Chief Minister office
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number DOCMO/R/2020/60003
Date of Filing 05/01/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought The matter is concerned with Grievance Status for registration number: PMOPG/E/2019/0617755 detail is attached. As an authorized representative of Dinesh Pratap Singh, applicant invites following information pointwise.

1-Provide the notings made in regard to the aforementioned grievance.

2-Name and designation of staff who accepted the report and considered the grievance disposed of.

3-Make available copy of report taking recourse of which grievance was disposed.

4-Make available circular, legislation, notification which may authorize other public authority to redress the submitted grievance attached.

* Concerned PIO RAM JIYAWAN
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Registration Number DOCMO/A/2020/60036
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 26/05/2020
Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 16/07/2020
Reply :- निस्तारित
View Document
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454413175
Email-ID shivprakashtiwari64992@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Chief Minister office
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number DOCMO/R/2020/60003
Request Registration Date 05/01/2020
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit
* PIO of Public Authority approached RAM JIYAWAN
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought D.M. Lucknow violated subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005 ipso facto obvious from the attached documents.Whether to forward the communique to D.M. aforementioned is part of procrastination instead of providing information quite obvious from the dilly dally approach.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2019/0617755

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Dinesh Pratap Singh
Date of Receipt
17/10/2019
Received By Ministry/Department
Prime Ministers Office
Grievance Description
In regard to authenticity of the claim of the police concerned that power of attorney given by Babu Singh to Dinesh Pratap Singh is no more valid as it was cancelled by the Babu Singh in the year 2000 is baseless which is quite obvious from the attached copy of the power of attorney provided by the office of registrar at Lucknow on 05/10/2019 to the counsel of the applicant.
Sir, please take the perusal of the attached PDF documents to the grievance which was made available by the office of the registrar at Lucknow on 05/10/2019 to the counsel of the applicant. Whether it has been rejected by the Babu Singh and moreover same was accepted by the Registrar concerned? Sir, how much efforts will be made by the police of the state capital Lucknow to conceal the true facts of the case and keep the senior rank officers in dark and away from the factual position of the case? Everyone knows that the power of attorney is a legally valid document and enforceable under law of land, therefore, its revocation must be in accordance with the prescribed procedures as follows.
Making A Revocation Legally Valid And Enforceable, followings are the prescribed norms which had to be followed by the concerned but they never did anything in accordance with the rule of law and prescribed provisions of law of land.
It is fairly simple to make a legally valid Revocation of Power of Attorney. All you need to do is carry out the following steps-If the Power of Attorney you wish to revoke was notarized or registered, you will need to do the same for the Revocation document as well.
Send a copy to the Attorney. Keep in mind the revocation is effective if it is received by the Attorney. Sending it via registered post would be ideal. No such document was ever sent to the aggrieved applicant if anything they did, only to terrorise the applicant and his family member that his power of attorney is forged quite obvious from the implications of serious fabricated charges not only on the applicant but also on the wife and daughter of the applicant. Whether it is a reflection of the rule of law in the state or sheer anarchy and an inscrutable face of the sphinx?
Send a copy of the Revocation of Power of Attorney to banks/institutions where the Attorney may have acted on your behalf. Can police reveal such acts followed by the false claimants moreover attached documents itself revealing the factual position that where the power of attorney was registered the same office has provided the copy of the power of attorney which is still not revoked which simply means that Lucknow bench of High court of Judicature at Allahabad was misled? The honourable court had only ordered to open the lock then open the gate so that multi named lady Anuradha Singh may seek a civil remedy but Lucknow police is either a court or was delegated the power of civil court quite obvious from the chronology of consequential events took place.
Send a copy to where the POA was registered. Eg deed registry, land titles office etc. Copy available in the office of the registrar at Lucknow is power of attorney given by Babu Singh to Dinesh Pratap Singh which is not revoked by the registrar at Lucknow. Vide attached PDF documents which prove the claims of the aggrieved applicant.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
04/01/2020
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित prakaran ke samandh me akhya ka avlekhan karn ka kast kare
Reply Document
Rating
Poor
Rating Remarks
Honourable Sir, please take the reference of report submitted by the concerned staff of the government on 6th December 2019 in which it was explicitly stated that matter is not concerned with the Tahsil Majihabad but it is directly concerned with the police station Ashiyana district Lucknow but it is unfortunate instead of that report in which it has been explicitly written that matter may be forwarded to the concerned mandate, concerned officer joint secretary Arun Kumar Dube made illegal efforts to get the grievance disposed on the basis of that report which was clearly a suggestion to forward the matter to the concerned Mandate which means they had to transfer the matter to the police station Ashiyana district- Lucknow state capital which is the mockery of the law of land. Here this question arises that what is the value of PMO reference letters in the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Whether such Malfide acts are not tantamount to cheating the PMO but still few are claiming to pro
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Arun Kumar Dube
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
sushil7769@gmail.com
Contact Number
0522 2226349
0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bhoomika Singh
Bhoomika Singh
4 months ago

It is quite obvious that matter is concerned with the mis management and Anarchy of the Government of Uttar Pradesh specially district administration Lucknow and it is most unfortunate that applicant submitted an application under subsection 1 of section 6 of Right to Information act 2005 and Chief Minister Office forwarded that application to the district magistrate Lucknow under subsection 3 of section 6 of Right to Information act 2005 but it is unfortunate even after eight month district magistrate Lucknow did not provide the information which is complete reflection of Anarchy.

Arun Pratap Singh
4 months ago

Why district magistrate Lucknow is running away from providing aforementioned sought information and making mockery of the Right to Information Act 2005?
First appeal exhausted, Surprising D.M. Lucknow did not touch R.T.I. Communique which is the reflection of the complete anarchy in the government machinery.
Honourable Sir, please take the reference of report submitted by the concerned staff of the government on 6th December 2019 in which it was explicitly stated that matter is not concerned with the Tahsil Majihabad but it is directly concerned with the police station Ashiyana district Lucknow.
Whether aforementioned sentence is disposal or an advice to send grievance to concerned mandate for disposal.

Preeti Singh
Preeti Singh
4 months ago

Instead of that report in which it has been explicitly written that matter may be forwarded to the concerned mandate, concerned officer joint secretary Arun Kumar Dube made illegal efforts to get the grievance disposed on the basis of that report which was clearly a suggestion to forward the matter to the concerned Mandate which means they had to transfer the matter to the police station Ashiyana district- Lucknow state capital

Pratima Parihar
Pratima Parihar
4 months ago

हर कोई जानता है कि पावर ऑफ अटॉर्नी कानूनी रूप से वैध दस्तावेज है और कानून के तहत लागू करने योग्य है, इसलिए, इसका निरसन निर्धारित प्रक्रियाओं के अनुसार होना चाहिए। एक निरसन कानूनी रूप से वैध और लागू करने के बाद, अनुवर्ती निर्धारित मानदंड हैं जिनका संबंधितों द्वारा पालन किया जाना था लेकिन उन्होंने कानून के नियम और भूमि के कानून के निर्धारित प्रावधानों के अनुसार कभी भी कुछ नहीं किया।