Feedback submitted ,now it is obligation of government to take action against its wrongdoer staff.

आवेदन
का विवरण
शिकायत
संख्या
15199160160090
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
महेश
प्रताप सिंह
आवेदक कर्ता का मोबाइल न०:
7379105911,0
विषय:
direct
concerned to purpose the law of land instead of making mockery of it
नियत तिथि:
29
– Jan – 2017
शिकायत की स्थिति:
निस्तारित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
दिनांक 02/06/2017
को फीडबैक:- How much surprising that wro
आवेदन का संलग्नक
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ
का प्रकार
आदेश
देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश
दिनांक
अधिकारी
को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
दिनांक
आख्या
नियत
दिनांक
स्थिति
आख्या
रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
अमित गुप्ता (सचिव मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय )
28
– Dec – 2016
आयुक्त ग्राम्य विकास
पृष्ठांकित
04
– May – 2017
refer
to attach letter
निस्तारित
2
अंतरित
आयुक्त (ग्राम्य विकास )
02
– Jan – 2017
जिलाधिकारीमिर्ज़ापुर,
कृपया जांचोपरांत यथोचित कार्यवाही किये जाने एवं
कृत कार्यवाही से अवगत कराने का कष्ट करें 
04
– May – 2017
refer
to attach letter
निस्तारित
3
आख्या
जिलाधिकारी ( )
03
– Jan – 2017
जिला पंचायत राज
अधिकारीमिर्ज़ापुर,पंचायती राज विभाग
आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें refer to attach
letter
03
– May – 2017
refer
to attach letter
निस्तारित

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh
<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
PLEASE direct concerned to pursue the law of land instead of
making mockery of it.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
5 May 2017 at 03:13
To:
supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>
Cc:
urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, pmosb
<pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, Anjali Anand Srivastava
<secy-cic@nic.in>
शिकायत संख्या
15199160160090
आवेदक कर्ता का नाम:
महेश प्रताप सिंह
How much surprising that wrongdoers are being shielded under the
nose of accountable public
 functionaries
?
Subject-Communication
dated-03-05-2017 addressed to your applicant is sheer
 illegal ,unjustified
,unconstitutional ,mockery of law of land and ultravires to
 constitution if accepted will only
promote lawlessness and anarchy in the system
and will set up bad precedent for future generation. 
With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites the kind
attention of the Hon
ble Sir
to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that D.P.R.O.
Mirzapur is itself a wrongdoer and shielding the wrongdoers indulged in
siphoning the public fund.
 Hon’ble Sir please take a glance of first second and third page of
attached documents which are reports of joint team of E.Os. nominated by
District Magistrate Mirzapur i.e. district level officers Deputy commissioner
MGNREGA and Project director. They have evidently recommended Rs. 1
 Lakh 1 thousand and 6 hundred 15 .   
2-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that aforementioned recommendation was made on
28-July-2015 .
 3-It is
submitted before the Hon
ble
Sir that under point 3 in the enquiry report ,it has been mentioned that
complaint regarding the plantation and pond couldn’t be looked into because
concerned didn’t provide the records so enquiry couldn’t be carried out
consequently sector officer be sent by B.D.O. to carry out enquiry on the
ground of merit and defect and then higher authorities be informed about the
report.
 
 4-It is
submitted before the Hon
ble
Sir that page four is the communication dated-03-05-2017 and page 5 is
enquiry report carried out by wrongdoers themselves who are proved guilty in
the report of team nominated by District Magistrate Mirzapur as
aforementioned. 
 5-It is
submitted before the Hon
ble
Sir that think about the time gap between
 28-July-2015 and 03-05-2017 i.e. time gap of one year nine month and five days.
Even layman can know the motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur and his working style
from existing circumstancial evidences.
 
 6-It is
submitted before the Hon
ble
Sir that your applicant motive was to implement the recommendation of enquiry
officer nominated by district magistrate  through enquiry so that
public exchequer be benefitted but motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is ipso facto
obvious that he wanted to shield his wrongdoer companions and he succeeded to
achieve its ulterior motives. 
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh
<yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Please direct the police to lodge F.I.R. against D.P.R.O.
Mirzapur under various sections of I.P.C. mentioned in the submissions as
matter is concerned with deep rooted corruption.
1
message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
6 May 2017 at 18:47
To:
pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, urgent-action
<urgent-action@ohchr.org>, 
supremecourt
<supremecourt@nic.in>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, uphrclko
<uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>,
 “csup@up.nic.in”
<csup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, lokayukta@hotmail.com
Subject D.P.R.O.
Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the
 senior rank officers so he must be
subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C.
With great respect to revered Sir , your applicant invites the 
kind attention of the Honble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that D.P.R.O Mirzapur 
cheated the senior rank officers through Communication 
dated-03-05-2017  like 1 District
Magistrate
 
Mirzapur 2-Commissioner ,rural development, Uttar 
Pradesh 3-Secretary, office of Honble chief minister, government of Uttar Pradesh and also your
applicant.
 
 Honble Sir, please take a glance of attached documents
 with this representation.
2-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that Section 465 in The 
Indian Penal Code
465. Punishment for forgery.Whoever commits forgery shall be 
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which 
may
extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
3-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that Section 466 in The 
Indian Penal Code 466. Forgery of
record of Court or of public
 
register, etc.1[Whoever forges a document or an electronic record], 
purporting to be a record or proceed­ing of or in a Court of Justice, or 
a register of birth, baptism, marriage or burial, or a
register kept by a
 public
servant as such, or a certificate or document purporting to be
 
made by a public servant in his
official capacity, or an authority to
 
institute or defend a suit, or to take
any proceedings therein, or to
 
confess judgment, or a power of
attorney, shall be punished with
 
imprisonment of either description for
a term which may extend to seven
 
years, and shall also be liable to
fine. 1[Explanation.
For the
purposes of
 
this section, register includes
any list, data or record of any entries
 
maintained in the electronic form as defined in clause
(r) of sub-section
4-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that IPC 467: 
Section
467 of the Indian Penal Code
Forgery of valuable security, will, etc.
Whoever forges a document which purports to be a valuable security
or a will, or an authority to adopt
 
a
son, or which purports to give authority to any person to make or transfer
any valuable security, or to
 receive the principal, interest or
dividends thereon, or to receive or deliver any money, movable
 
property, or valuable security, or any document purporting to be
an acquittance or receipt acknowledging
 
the payment of money, or an acquittance or receipt for the
delivery of any movable property or valuable
 
security,
shall be punished with 1 *imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of
either description
 for a term which may extend to ten
years, and shall also be liable to fine.
5-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that IPC 468: 
Section 468 of the Indian Penal Code
Forgery for purpose of cheating
Whoever
commits forgery, intending that the document forged shall be used for the
purpose of
 cheating, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description for a term which may
 
extend
to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
6-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that Section 469 in The 
Indian Penal Code
469. Forgery for purpose of harming reputation.Whoever commits forgery, 1[intending 
that the document or electronic record forged] shall harm the repu­tation of any party, 
or
knowing that it is likely to be used for that purpose, shall be punished with
 imprisonment of either description
for a term which may extend to three years,
 and shall also be liable to fine.
7-It is submitted before the Honble Sir that Section 471 in The 
Indian Penal Code
471. Using as genuine a forged 1[document or electronic record].Whoever
 fraudulently or dishonestly uses as
genuine any 1[document or electronic record]
 
which he knows or has reason to believe to be a forged 1[document
or electronic record],
 
shall
be punished in the same manner as if he had forged such 1[document or
electronic
 record].

2 comments on Feedback submitted ,now it is obligation of government to take action against its wrongdoer staff.

  1. Whether staffs of B.D.O. who are itself proved guilty in the enquiry report carried out under Panchaayti Raj Act can supersede the enquiry report by misinterpreting earlier report. Whether D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is a layman who is not apprised with the fact that pricipal of natural justice never allowes a wrongdoer to carry out enquiry in order to prove itself innocent. Undoubtedly D.P.R.O. Mirzapur set wrongdoers scot free by making the mockery of law of land. Undoubtedly D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is guilty of misinterpreting the enquiry report through wrongdoer subordinates of B.D.O. Chhanbey.

  2. –D.P.R.O. Mirzapur submitted forged documents before the
    senior rank officers so he must be subjected to scrutiny under sections 465,466,467,468,469 and 471 of I.P.C.
    With great respect to revered Sir , your applicant invites the
    kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
    1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.P.R.O Mirzapur
    cheated the senior rank officers through Communication
    dated-03-05-2017 like 1 –District Magistrate
    Mirzapur 2-Commissioner ,rural development, Uttar
    Pradesh 3-Secretary, office of Hon’ble chief minister, government of Uttar Pradesh and also your applicant.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: