||How much surprising that wrongdoers are being shielded under the nose of accountable public functionaries ? Subject-Communication dated-03-05-2017 addressed to your applicant is sheer illegal ,unjustified ,unconstitutional ,mockery of law of land and ultravires to constitution if accepted will only promote lawlessness and anarchy in the system and will set up bad precedent for future generation. With great respect to revered Sir, your applicant invites the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows. 1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is itself a wrongdoer and shielding the wrongdoers indulged in siphoning the public fund. Hon’ble Sir please take a glance of first second and third page of attached documents which are reports of joint team of E.Os. nominated by District Magistrate Mirzapur i.e. district level officers Deputy commissioner MGNREGA and Project director. They have evidently recommended Rs. 1 Lakh 1 thousand and 6 hundred 15 . 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that aforementioned recommendation was made on 28-July-2015 . 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that under point 3 in the enquiry report ,it has been mentioned that complaint regarding the plantation and pond couldn’t be looked into because concerned didn’t provide the records so enquiry couldn’t be carried out consequently sector officer be sent by B.D.O. to carry out enquiry on the ground of merit and defect and then higher authorities be informed about the report. 4-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that page four is the communication dated-03-05-2017 and page 5 is enquiry report carried out by wrongdoers themselves who are proved guilty in the report of team nominated by District Magistrate Mirzapur as aforementioned. 5-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that think about the time gap between 28-July-2015 and 03-05-2017 i.e. time gap of one year nine month and five days. Even layman can know the motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur and his working style from existing circumstancial evidences. 6-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that your applicant motive was to implement the recommendation of enquiry officer nominated by district magistrate through enquiry so that public exchequer be benefitted but motive of D.P.R.O. Mirzapur is ipso facto obvious that he wanted to shield his wrongdoer companions and he succeeded to achieve its ulterior motives.