Director secondary education did not comply the direction of High court of judicature even after 10 years.

Case Status – Allahabad
Pending
Writ – A / 20121 /
2006 [Mirzapur]
Petitioner:
RAJENDRA PRATAP
SINGH
Respondent:
STATE OF U.P. AND
OTHERS
Counsel (Pet.):
P.C. CHAUHAN
Counsel (Res.):
C.S.C.
Category:
Service-Writ
Petitions Relating To Secondary Education (non Teaching Staff) (single
Bench)-Salary And Allowances
Date of Filing:
10/04/2006
Last Listed on:
11/01/2016 in
Court No. 7
Next Listing Date:
To be listed on
19/07/2016
This is not an authentic/certified copy of the information
regarding status of a case. Authentic/certified information may be obtained
under Chapter VIII Rule 30 of Allahabad High Court Rules. Mistake, if any, may
be brought to the notice of OSD (Computer).
Whether without paying bribe a case can be listed in the courts. If
not ,then how it is possible for a poor to seek justice in our courts where
every one has to face cumbersome lengthy process which never lasts as evident
from huge pending litigation in our various courts and non compliance of court
orders by the bureaucrats and executives. It seems that measuring scale of
corruption has lost so quantum of corruption in the machinery which has taken
giant form is not visible
 
to our accountable public functionary.
  
    When the direction of High Court was taken under
teeth by director secondary education ,then why director i.e. respondent no.-1
didn’t submit counter affidavit in High Court of judicature at Allahabad. Here
DIOS Mirzapur was already interested to comply the order of High Court but bill
prepared by DIOS Mirzapur was returned back by Director secondary education.
Here multiple writs were filed by aggrieved but order of High Court was not
complied by Director Secondary Education.
It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether the act of the central public information officer ,High
court of judicature at Allahabad is not lowering the dignity of courts in
India. Whether such act on the part CPIO is not tantamount to assault on set
high standard norm ,ethical values and impeccable integrity of temple of
justice. To whom CPIO wants to shield by not revealing the sought information ?
In view of your applicant ,working style in judiciary must be crystal clear
instead of such inscrutable sphinx.
It is submitted
before the Hon’ble Sir that
 Hon’ble Sir-Plese take
a glance of order of High Court at Allahabad dated 13.4.2006 in writ no.20121
of 2006 delivered by justice Tarun Agrawala as follows- Apparently , the
impugned order dated. 1.2.2006 is against the teeth of the direction given by
this court in its judgement dated 16.5.2005(it may be 16/04/2004 order passed
by Justice Jgadish Bhalla) .Standing Counsel appearing for respondent no.1 to 4
will file counter affidavit within three weeks explaining as to what the
respondent mean by the words “Sadharan Vetanman”. List immediately
thereafter. Sd/-Tarun Agarwala J. 13.4.2006 Respondents-1-Director secondary
education Arth-1 Allahabad ( is the necessary party in the matter concerned)
2-Assistant deputy director secondary education working in the of director of
secondary education .Allahabad. 3-D.D.R. Mirzapur.4-DIOS Mirzapur. 5-Committee
of management R.I.C. Naugaon ,Mirzapur.

2 comments on Director secondary education did not comply the direction of High court of judicature even after 10 years.

  1. It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that Hon'ble Sir-Plese take a glance of order of High Court at Allahabad dated 13.4.2006 in writ no.20121 of 2006 delivered by justice Tarun Agrawala as follows- Apparently , the impugned order dated. 1.2.2006 is against the teeth of the direction given by this court in its judgement dated 16.5.2005(it may be 16/04/2004 order passed by Justice Jgadish Bhalla) .Standing Counsel appearing for respondent no.1 to 4 will file counter affidavit within three weeks explaining as to what the respondent mean by the words "Sadharan Vetanman". List immediately thereafter. Sd/-Tarun Agarwala J. 13.4.2006 Respondents-1-Director secondary education Arth-1 Allahabad ( is the necessary party in the matter concerned) 2-Assistant deputy director secondary education working in the of director of secondary education .Allahabad. 3-D.D.R. Mirzapur.4-DIOS Mirzapur. 5-Committee of management R.I.C. Naugaon ,Mirzapur.

  2. Why order was not complied by director secondary education? Whether director was apprised with the fact direction of the court if not complied ,then it would cause no adverse impact on him. One fact is clear that judicial members itself remained failed to maintain the dignity of high court.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: