Dinesh Pratap Singh made queries in court of A.C.J.M. III Lucknow so that truth may come out

 

Booked At
Booked On
Destination Pincode
Tariff
Article Type
Delivery Location
Delivery Confirmed On
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
13/10/2019 17:57:19
226001
30.00
Registered Post
Lucknow GPO
16/10/2019 16:35:08

 

Event Details For : RU541008400IN

 

Current Status : Item Delivery Confirmed

 

Date
Time
Office
Event
16/10/2019
16:35:08
Lucknow GPO
Item Delivery Confirmed
16/10/2019
11:35:29
Lucknow GPO
Out for Delivery
16/10/2019
08:39:14
Lucknow GPO
Item Received
15/10/2019
16:06:55
CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Bagged
15/10/2019
15:29:52
CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Received
15/10/2019
03:44:04
CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Bagged
14/10/2019
23:10:31
CRC Lucknow RMS
Item Received
13/10/2019
20:23:22
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Dispatched
13/10/2019
20:22:35
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Bagged
13/10/2019
17:57:19
Mirzapur RMS POS Counter
Item Booked

 

 

In the court of A.C.J.M. III, District Court District-Lucknow

 

                 Crime
Number-269 of the year 2009

 

                Under
I.P.C. section-420, 448 and 406

 

               Police
station-Ashiyana, District-Lucknow

 


State versus Dinesh Pratap Singh

 

Prayer-Proceedings is against the spirit of the order
Dated-07/03/2006 passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at
Allahabad if Aaraadhanaa Singh also named Guddi is Anuradha Singh.

 

Most respected Sir, the applicant
aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, wants to draw the kind attention of the revered
Sir to the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at
Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number135 HC Year 2006 as follows It is simply
ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase
so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take
the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she
may have the liberty to go anywhere. Since it is not a case in the strict sense
of illegal detention, therefore, no direction can be issued to the respondent
to produce the detenue in the court and allow her to live free at her home but
since she can not take necessary steps for taking the remedy in the competent
court, therefore it is simply ordered that the alleged detenue Smt Anuradha
Singh shall be allowed to go out of the house and respondent number 4 to 7
shall open the lock of the door and open the door so that Smt Anuradha Singh
may come out and take appropriate remedy.

 

Dated-07/03/2006                     Signed by the concerned
Hon’ble Justices of Division bench of Lucknow.

 

Following queries are made to the
plaintiff as follows.

 

1-
Whether
police can provide the civil remedy or police is the competent court? Whether
the police informed the court in regard to the aforementioned order? Applicant
wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble court that the respondent
number First is Secretary of home department, civil secretariat, Government of
Uttar Pradesh and respondent number second who is senior superintendent of
police Lucknow as well as the station house officer police station Ashiyana who
is the respondent number 3 in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed
in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by
Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother
Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh.

 

2-
What
is the cause of three I.Ds. of Aaraadhanaa Singh
and her mother is having two I.Ds. ? Undoubtedly an individual
is free to change its name but by changing the name to get public assistance
illegally and seek justices in order to achieve its ulterior motives can’t be justified.

 

3-
When
the station house officer police station-Ashiyana remained the respondent
number -3 in the aforementioned case, why had he made the mockery of the order
of the High court of judicature at Allahabad?

 

4-
Whether
civil remedy can be sought through criminal proceedings as being done by police
concerned even when their senior rank officers have been made in the party in
the matter placed before the division bench of the High court and court passed
an explicit order?

 

5-
Whether
it is not contempt of court that fabricated charges of serious nature were
slapped by the police in order to terrorise the applicant and his family
members so that they may leave their house and police and the party concerned
may achieve their ulterior motives?

 

6-
Why
did the police change its stand submitted in its affidavit before the Lucknow
bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad which means, misled the Hon’ble
court?

 

Hon’ble
Sir may be pleased to pass the order that concerned may reply to the queries
made by the aggrieved applicant and alleged accused in the case being pursued
by the police. For this applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.

 

Date-13-10-2019
Applicant/alleged accused

 

                                                    Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh

 

Mohalla-Surekapuram,
Jabalpur Road, Lskshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, District-Mirzapur, PIN
Code-231001.

 

 

5 comments on Dinesh Pratap Singh made queries in court of A.C.J.M. III Lucknow so that truth may come out

  1. Whether it is not contempt of court that fabricated charges of serious nature were slapped by the police in order to terrorise the applicant and his family members so that they may leave their house and police and the party concerned may achieve their ulterior motives?

  2. Whether it is not mockery of the law of land that Lucknow police provided civil remedy by acting as civil court in order to comply the order passed by the Lucknow bench of High court of judicature at Allahabad. Justice delivery system is the integral part of the government and right to justice is must be accessed to every citizen.
    Whether police can provide the civil remedy or police is the competent court? Whether the police informed the court in regard to the aforementioned order? Applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble court that the respondent number First is Secretary of home department, civil secretariat, Government of Uttar Pradesh and respondent number second who is senior superintendent of police Lucknow as well as the station house officer police station Ashiyana who is the respondent number 3 in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh.

  3. Whether it is not mockery of the law of land that cunning lady filed suit in the high court of judicature at Allahabad Lucknow bench and high court denied to provide the the possession of the land and house and ordered her to seek the the Civil remedy from the appropriate Court but it is unfortunate that when she provided the illegal gratification to the Lucknow police who was the party in the matter and home secretary itself was the first respondent in the matter. Lucknow police acted like competent court passed the order to lodge FIR against the Dinesh Pratap Singh and his wife and daughter and later on they arrested Dinesh Pratap Singh and family members fled away from the house and finally on getting this golden opportunity they broke the lock of the room and made house trespass and rob the entire valuable things of the room thus grabbed the house and land of the aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh by making the mockery law of land. Such is the actual face of the Lucknow police which can frighten every citizen of this country who may be a law abiding.

  4. There is tyranny and corruption in the judiciary which is alarming. Most surprising is that no action is taken on the representation of the aggrieved people. Whether police can provide the civil remedy or police is the competent court? Whether the police informed the court in regard to the aforementioned order?

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: