Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.
Please note down the details of registration.
| Registration Number | DPTAR/A/2020/60001 |
| Name | Yogi M P Singh |
| Date of Filing | 14-01-2020 |
| Request filed with | Administrative Reforms Department |
| Â Contact Details | |
| Telephone Number | 9454411208 |
| Email-ID | ard092156@gmail.com |
| Registration Number | DPTAR/A/2020/60001 |
| Name | Yogi M P Singh |
| Date of Filing | 14/01/2020 |
| Status | RTI APPEAL RECEIVEDÂ as on 14/01/2020 |
| Â Nodal Officer Details | |
| Telephone Number | 9454411208 |
| Email-ID | ard092156@gmail.com |
Pasted from <https://rtionline.up.gov.in/request/status.php>
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
| *Â Public Authority | Administrative Reforms Department |
Personal Details of Appellant:-
| Request Registration Number | DPTAR/R/2019/60037 |
| Request Registration Date | 29/11/2019 |
| *Â Name | Yogi M P Singh |
| Gender | Male |
| *Â Address | Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office |
| Pincode | 231001 |
| Country | India |
| State | Uttar Pradesh |
| Status | Details not provided |
| Pincode | Literate |
| Phone Number | Details not provided |
| Mobile Number | +91-7379105911 |
| Email-ID | yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com |
Appeal Details :-
| Citizenship | Indian |
| *Â Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? | No |
| *Â Ground For Appeal | Refused access to Information Requested |
| *Â PIO of Public Authority approached | Jivan Chandra Pant |
| PIO Order/Decision Number | Details not provided |
| *Â PIO Order/Decision Date | |
| ((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) ) | |
| *Â Prayer or Relief Sought | Respected First Appellate Authority, the appellant kindly draw the due attention of the Honourable Sir to following submissions.
1-SPIO violated the subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 so action must be taken. 2-SPIO violated subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 so action must be taken. 3-SPIO can only deny sought information under section 8 and 9 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 but did not do so so action must be taken. 4-UPSIC had directed to ensure the compliance of recovery orders to D.M. Mirzapur so the matter is concerned with only D.M. and if D.M. is anarchist then department of administrative reform. Consequently, SPIO itself violated subclause 5 of clause 4 of notification as detail attached. |
| Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) |
Pasted from <https://rtionline.up.gov.in/request/regdetails.php?regId=mtj2pfAc6FWUiQXkUQOYAwZTGvXry8Gak7HCFH%2BHttA%3D>
Uttar Pradesh Shasan Prashasnik Sudhar Anubhag-2 In pursuance of the provisions of clause (3) of Article 348 of the Constitution, the Governor is pleased to order the publication of the following English translation of notification no. 544/43-2-2015, dated 3 December 2015. NOTIFICATION No. 544/43-2-2015-Su.Aa.Ni. 2015(1)2015 Lucknow: Dated 03 December, 2015
(5) If the State Public Information Officer finds that a request made for disclosure of information relates partly or wholly to a single other public authority, then such State Public Information Officer shall, within five days from the date of receipt of the request, transfer the request or such part of it as may be appropriate, to the other public authority in the format given in Form 4, and shall furnish within the time prescribed that part of the information to the applicant, as is available with the public authority to which he belongs.
Provided that if a part or whole of the information sought from a public authority is held by two or more other public authorities, then the State Public Information Officer shall not transfer the request for information to such other public authorities. The State Public Information Officer shall provide only such information to the applicant as is held by the public authority to which he belongs, and shall advise the applicant to move separate requests for information to the State Public Information Officers of the other public authorities holding parts of the information sought.
| Registration Number | DPTAR/R/2019/60037 |
| Name | Yogi M P Singh |
| Date of Filing | 29/11/2019 |
| Status | REQUEST REJECTEDÂ as on 14/01/2020 |
| Reason for Rejection :-Â Rule 4(5).
Remarks:- |
|
| Â Nodal Officer Details | |
| Telephone Number | 9454411208 |
| Email-ID | ard092156@gmail.com |
Pasted from <https://rtionline.up.gov.in/request/status.php>
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
| *Â Public Authority | Administrative Reforms Department |
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
| Registration Number | DPTAR/R/2019/60037 |
| Date of Filing | 29/11/2019 |
| *Â Name | Yogi M P Singh |
| Gender | Male |
| *Â Address | Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office |
| Pincode | 231001 |
| Country | India |
| State | Uttar Pradesh |
| Status | Details not provided |
| Pincode | Literate |
| Above Graduate | |
| Phone Number | Details not provided |
| Mobile Number | +91-7379105911 |
| Email-ID | yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com |
Request Details :-
| Citizenship | Indian |
| *Â Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? | No |
| ((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) ) | |
| *Â Description of Information Sought | PIO may provide access to information in regard to recovery of the penalty imposed by SIC Uttar Pradesh 4 PIOs.
1-Copy of Treasury Challan made in the four cases. 2-Name of the PIO, still not paid the imposed penalty with detail of cause, not complying order of SIC. 3-Reason of failure of D. M. Mirzapur in ensuring compliance of SIC orders attached to communiqué. |
| *Â Concerned PIO | Jivan Chandra Pant |
| Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) |
Pasted from <https://rtionline.up.gov.in/request/regdetails.php?regId=m%2Bwh1YCNH4yRVpxYFs%2B%2FftbEui6ZFYrw1Vn8cvdwSCk%3D>
Arun Pratap Singh
Beerbhadra Singh
Preeti Singh
Yogi
Whether it is justified way to overlook the request of information seekers in the state of Uttar Pradesh?
1-SPIO violated the subsection 1 of section 7 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 so action must be taken.
2-SPIO violated subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 so action must be taken.
3-SPIO can only deny sought information under section 8 and 9 of R.T.I. Act of 2005 but did not do so so action must be taken.
4-UPSIC had directed to ensure the compliance of recovery orders to D.M. Mirzapur so the matter is concerned with only D.M. and if D.M. is anarchist then department of administrative reform. Consequently, SPIO itself violated subclause 5 of clause 4 of notification as detail attached.
An administrative reform is a conscious, well-considered change that is carried out in a public sector organization or system for the purpose of improving its structure, operation or the quality of its workforce.
Really it is quite obvious from the above definition that whatever is the definition of the administrative reforms whether really this definition is being followed by the personnel of the department in the Government of Uttar Pradesh if not pursued by the staff of the Government of Uttar Pradesh then what is the motive of such administrative Reform which is not in accordance with the definition of the administrative reform,
Excellent investigating report which will expose the entire state government if brought to public domain.
Whoever were in this state of Uttar Pradesh as incumbent, corruption is too much rampant no action is taken against the wrongdoer public staff so honesty cannot be expected in this state from the public functionaries now time has come and public may consider about its choice.