Date of hearing is fixed on 10-Jun-2019 in the SIC in the appeal of Rishabh Dubey against DPRO

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Matter is concerned with the syphoning of huge public fund of Swachchh Bharat Mission or cleanly drive mission of Hon’ble Prime Minister of India.
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 30 May 2019 at 16:35

To: dmmir@up.nic.in, commmir@nic.in, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, “sec. sic” <sec.sic@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>

सभी माननीय जिम्मेदार लोक सेवक को मालुम हो की इस जनसूचना आवेदन के सम्बन्ध में सूचना उपलब्ध कराना तो दूर रहा अभी तक इससे सम्बंधित कोई पत्र  व्योहार तक नहीं किया गया | जिलाधिकारी महोदय समक्ष प्रथम अपील प्रस्तुत किया गया उसमें भी कोई कार्यवाही नहीं की गई है | जनसूचना अधिकार अधिनियम २००५ के प्रावधानों की इतनी बड़ी दुर्दशा क्यों | 
श्री मान जिलाधिकारी महोदय कम से कम अब जिला पंचायत राज अधिकारी सूचना उपलब्ध करा दे क्यों की माननीय राज्य सूचना आयोग में १०-जून -२०१९ को की जाएगी और प्रार्थी उसका अध्ययन करके कमिया जान ले और अपना पक्ष रख सके अन्यथा अगली तिथि लगेगी और जिला पंचायत राज अधिकारी या सहायक को अगली तिथि को भी अपना वातानुकूलित कार्यालय छोड़ना पडेगा | 

On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 20:36, Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> wrote:

 An appeal under subsection 3 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 as public information officer DPRO Mirzapur made the mockery of the Right to Information Act 2005. District Mirzapur remained silent on this mockery of provisions of Right to Information Act 2005.
To
                       Chief Information Commissioner/ companion commissioners
                             U.P. Information Commission                                   7/7A, RTI Bhawan,
                              Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar
                                Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
Subject-DPRO Mirzapur did not entertain the application submitted under Right to Information Act 2005 but more surprising and frightening event when district Magistrate Mirzapur overlooked the first appeal in order to shield the wrongdoers who siphoned the public fund concerned with Swachchh Bharat Mission or cleanly drive mission of Hon’ble Prime Minister of India.
Appellant-Rishabh Dubey S/O Ravindra Kumar Dubey
Village & Post -Lalganj District-Mirzapur PIN Code-231211
State-Uttar Pradesh, Country-India 
   Versus 
Respondent-1- District Panchayat Raj Officer /Public Information Officer.
District-Mirzapur PIN Code-231001
Respondent-District Magistrate/ First Appellate Authority 
District-Mirzapur PIN Code-231001  

Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to following submissions as follows.

1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that Here this question arises that why no action was taken by District Magistrate Mirzapur on the first appeal of information seeker ipso facto obvious that his office received the letter/communication on 29/10/2018.
It seems that the government of Uttar Pradesh threw the Right to Information Act 2005 into the dustbin. Whether the government is not shielding the wrongdoers who have syphoned the entire fund concerned with cleanly drive mission of the government of India.
Track Consignment
Indicates a required field.
* Consignment Number
Booking Office
Booking Date
Article Type
Delivery Office
Delivery Date
Tariff
Mirzapur HO
27/10/2018 10:30:18
Registered Post
Mirzapur HO
29/10/2018 16:59:13
22.00
Event Details For : RU202480217IN Current Status : Item Dispatched
Date
Time
Country
Location
Event Type
Mail Category
Next Office
Extra Information
01/11/2018
05:00:53
Mirzapur RMS L2R
Item Dispatched
29/10/2018
16:59:13
Mirzapur HO
Item Delivered
29/10/2018
10:46:33
Mirzapur HO
Out for Delivery
29/10/2018
07:36:22
Mirzapur HO
Item Received
28/10/2018
04:04:32
Mirzapur RMS L2R
Item Bagged
27/10/2018
23:08:16
Mirzapur RMS L2R
Item Received
27/10/2018
15:27:45
Mirzapur HO
Item Bagged
27/10/2018
10:30:18
Mirzapur HO
Item Booked
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that the appellant sought 8 point information from the DPRO Mirzapur in regard to huge syphoning of the public fund concerned with the swachchh Bharat Mission on 15/09/2018 but D.P.R.O. Mirzapur neither provided the sought information nor made any correspondence in regard to R.T.I. Application which is mockery of the Right to Information Act 2005. Hon’ble Sir may be pleased to take a glance of the attached PDF copy of the R.T.I. Application. From the following online tracking of the registered post it is quite obvious that article was delivered on 17/09/2018.
Track Consignment
Indicates a required field.
* Consignment Number
Article Type
Delivery Location
Delivered On
Registered Post
Mirzapur HO
17/09/2018 19:11:41
Event Details For : RU452020868IN Current Status : Item Delivered
Date
Time
Office
Event
17/09/2018
19:11:41
Mirzapur HO
Item Delivered
17/09/2018
10:51:20
Mirzapur HO
Out for Delivery
Booked At
Destination Pincode
Tariff
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Event Details For : RU452020868IN Current Status : Bag Despatched to MIRZAPUR
Date
Time
Office
Event
16/09/2018
04:15:35
MIRZAPUR RMS (CRC)
Bag Despatched to MIRZAPUR
15/09/2018
22:25:24
MIRZAPUR RMS (CRC)
Item Bagged to MIRZAPUR
15/09/2018
20:52:58
MIRZAPUR RMS (CRC)
Item Received
15/09/2018
20:52:58
MIRZAPUR RMS (CRC)
Bag Opened
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that please take a glance of the subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005.
  7. Disposal of request.—(/) Subject to the proviso to sub-section (2) of section 5 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 6, the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, on receipt of a request under section 6 shall, as expeditiously as possible, and in any case within thirty days of the receipt of the request. either provide the information on payment of such fee as may be prescribed or reject the request for any of the reasons specified in sections 8 and 9: Provided that where the information sought for concerns the life or liberty of a person, the same shall be provided within forty-eight hours of the receipt of the request.
Whether aforementioned provision was not violated by the DPRO Mirzapur and D.M. Mirzapur not cooperated him by sitting on the R.T.I. Appeal made under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005?
         Here copy of the appeal is also attached with this appeal in the PDF form.

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                          Yours sincerely
Date-18-01-2019              Rishabh Dubey 

address as aforementioned

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Yogi
1 year ago

श्री मान जिलाधिकारी महोदय कम से कम अब जिला पंचायत राज अधिकारी सूचना उपलब्ध करा दे क्यों की माननीय राज्य सूचना आयोग में १०-जून -२०१९ को की जाएगी और प्रार्थी उसका अध्ययन करके कमिया जान ले और अपना पक्ष रख सके अन्यथा अगली तिथि लगेगी और जिला पंचायत राज अधिकारी या सहायक को अगली तिथि को भी अपना वातानुकूलित कार्यालय छोड़ना पडेगा |

Arun Pratap Singh
1 year ago

Here this question arises that why public information officer i.e. DPRO Mirzapur did not provide the sought information to the information seeker and First appellate authority i.e. district magistrate Mirzapur did not entertain the appeal submitted under subsection 1 of the section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005? Undoubtedly it is mockery of the provisions of the Right to Informat Act 2005.

Beerbhadra Singh
1 year ago

Right to Information act 2005 I was brought up by our accountable public functionaries in order to enhance transparency and accountability in the working of public authority but because of rampant corruption in the government machinery no public authority in this country is interested to provide sought information to the information seekers otherwise their wrong rules will come into the public domain and they don't want to be publicly exposed.