Corruption overshadowed the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005.

Corruption overshadowed the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005.

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Attachments10:06 PM (2 minutes ago)

to pmosbsupremecourturgent-actionhgovupcsupcmupsec.sicsecy-cicak.dash
Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions acting in caucus with public authorities exploring various tricks to deprive information seekers from their sought information. Such unhealthy practice merely promoting corruption in the system and incredibility of public institutions is swarming up in the psyche of common man.
08 January 2016
20:46
Whether this is not corruption that CPIO, High court of judicature at Allahabad took under teeth the direction of central information commission and CIC remained mute spectators of it. What is the need of such teeth less information commissions who are merely burden on public exchequer ?
With due respect your applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the Hon’ble Sir to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that central information commission returned back 15284 second appeal /complaint filed before it on flimsy ground. Whether it is justified way to curb the backlog. Please take a glance of attached documents with this representation.
 2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that whether violation of subsection 1 of section 7 is curable before first appellate authority if not ,how commissions can overlook the complaints on the ground that first appeal was not made in the matter. First appeal may be instrumental in seeking information but not penalizing the erring PIOs. In most of the cases ,F.A.A. blindly supports the stand of public information officers.
 3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that in the name of selection of judicial members as information commissioners , Government/ state government articulates that job of information commissioner is merely to be instrumental in providing the sought information to common citizenry but when government appointed information commissioners had to be instrumental in providing sought information , they hatch various tricks to deprive information seekers from seeking information as information seeker bypassed the jurisdiction of first appellate authority.
                                This is humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook  the rights of citizenry by delivering services in arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap benefit of loopholes in system and depriving poor citizens from right to justice. Therefore it is need of hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this your applicant shall ever pray you Hon’ble Sir.
                                Yours  sincerely
                            Yogi M. P. Singh  Mobile number-7379105911
Mohalla-Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road District-Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh ,India

2 comments on Corruption overshadowed the provisions of Right to Information Act 2005.

  1. Whether this is not corruption that CPIO, High court of judicature at Allahabad took under teeth the direction of central information commission and CIC remained mute spectators of it. What is the need of such teeth less information commissions who are merely burden on public exchequer ?

  2. There is no confusion that act is excellent but incompetent and doubtful integrity of staffs in the commissions is our main concern. Think about the gravity of situation that those appointed to safeguard the interests of information seekers itself playing the negative role and becoming blockade in the path of seeking information.
    It is submitted before the Hon'ble Sir that whether violation of subsection 1 of section 7 is curable before first appellate authority if not ,how commissions can overlook the complaints on the ground that first appeal was not made in the matter. First appeal may be instrumental in seeking information but not penalizing the erring PIOs. In most of the cases ,F.A.A. blindly supports the stand of public information officers.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: