Copy of students not checked seriously by BTEU of U. P. consequently resentment among students

आवेदन
का विवरण
शिकायत
संख्या
40015719060092
आवेदक कर्ता का
नाम:
Satyam Shukla
आवेदक कर्ता का
मोबाइल न०:
7071061621,7071061621
विषय:
The matter is concerned with the Satyam Shukla, Name of the
father Sachchidanand Shukla is a regular student of Polytechnic third year in
the Government Polytechnic Rajgarh. Enrollment numberE1781035500019 and Roll
number2975550234016 Subject Carelessness in checking the copy of Mathematics
I B i.e. of the first year and the second semester of the student. Most
revered Sir Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due
respect to the following submissions as follows. 1 It is being submitted
before the Hon’ble Sir that in the aforementioned paper, the applicant had
got 12 out of 50 marks which caused the promotion to the second year instead
of fairly passing and the applicant appeared in the back paper during the
second year exam. For detail, please take a glance of the attached mark sheet
to the grievance. 2It is being submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that
applicant did paper excellently in the back paper exam and had the command
that he will score above 27 marks but shocked to see the result when earlier
obtained 12 marks was again awarded to student. There are several other
students who were also awarded the same marks as they had got in their
regular exam which implies that copy of back paper exam was not checked by
the concerned only earlier obtained marks were awarded.
नियत तिथि:
26 – Sep – 2019
शिकायत की स्थिति:
लम्बित
रिमाइंडर :
फीडबैक :
फीडबैक की स्थिति:
आवेदन
का संलग्नक
अग्रसारित विवरण
क्र..
सन्दर्भ
का प्रकार
आदेश
देने वाले अधिकारी
आदेश
दिनांक
अधिकारी
को प्रेषित
आदेश
आख्या
दिनांक
आख्या
स्थिति
आख्या
रिपोर्ट
1
अंतरित
ऑनलाइन
सन्दर्भ
11 – Sep – 2019
सचिव संयुक्त प्रवेश परीक्षा परिषद्,उ०प्र०
अनमार्क

Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Carelessness in checking the copy of Mathematics I B i.e. of the first year and the second semester of the student.
1 message
Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> 11 September 2019 at 14:37
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, cmup <cmup@up.nic.in>, hgovup@up.nic.in, csup@up.nic.in, uphrclko <uphrclko@yahoo.co.in>

The matter is concerned with the Satyam Shukla, Name of the father-Sachchidanand Shukla is a regular student of Polytechnic third year in the Government Polytechnic Rajgarh. Enrollment number-E1781035500019 and Roll number-2975550234016
Subject-Carelessness in checking the copy of Mathematics I B i.e. of the first year and the second semester of the student.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is being submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that in the aforementioned paper, the applicant had got 12 out of 50 marks which caused the promotion to the second year instead of fairly passing and the applicant appeared in the back paper during the second year exam. For detail, please take a glance of the attached mark sheet to the grievance.
2-It is being submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that applicant did paper excellently in the back paper exam and had the command that he will score above 27 marks but shocked to see the result when earlier obtained 12 marks was again awarded to student. There are several other students who were also awarded the same marks as they had got in their regular exam which implies that copy of back paper exam was not checked by the concerned only earlier obtained marks were awarded.
3-It is being submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that it was mere formality to extort money in the name of back paper exam but public authority is not serious about the future of the students as there is resentment among the students on the large scale who were complaining to the principal of the college but principal Sir expressed inability to help the students as the matter is closely concerned with board of technical education, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow.
                                This is a humble request of the applicant to you, Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos in an arbitrary manner by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer in order to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray you, Hon’ble Sir.                                                          Yours sincerely
  Date-11/09/2019                                 Satyam Shukla, Name of the father-Sachchidanand Shukla, Village-Naugaon, Post –Nadini, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh.

3 comments on Copy of students not checked seriously by BTEU of U. P. consequently resentment among students

  1. Hon'ble Sir, it was mere formality to extort money in the name of back paper exam but public authority is not serious about the future of the students as there is resentment among the students on the large scale who were complaining to the principal of the college but principal Sir expressed inability to help the students as the matter is closely concerned with board of technical education, Uttar Pradesh Lucknow.

  2. Now a days in this country it has been practice that the bodies which conduct the examinations of the student its staffs usually make errors in the certificates so that aggrieved student may take shelter of them and they may demand bribe from the student and this is their back door income and they are promoting this backdoor income day by day so that concerned students are suffering a lot and when the Complaints are made before accountable public functionaries they do not come forward in order to help the students whether it is not Anarchy in this largest democracy in the world why our public functionaries are not curbing corruption in the government machinery.

  3. Now a days our boards which conduct the the exam of the students have been hub of the corruption, one can say that rampant corruption because they make mistakes in the certificates of the students thereafter concerned students make request to them in order to sort out the errors their demand the bribe from students, whether it is justified and whatever practice is being followed in our boards cannot be praiseworthy and most important question is that why our public functionaries are not taking any action against corrupt staff quite obvious from the lackadaisical approach of them and the complaints submitted by the students or their representatives, whether it is not a reflection of the failure of the system in which there is rampant corruption and accountable public functionaries are not interested to sort out growing corruption in the government machinery.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: